COMPARISON BETWEEN PAPER-BASED AND WEB- BASED TEST IN THE CLINICAL SKILLS LABORATORY OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
Doni Widyandana(1*)
(1) Department of Medical Education,Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Background: E-Learning or web-based technology can be used to train undergraduate medical students’ clinical
reasoning skills. Currently, many learning methods are being developed using web-based environment to replace
paper-based because they are more efficient in terms of paper usage and are flexible for a student in accessing
materials. This study aims to explore student’s working durationaccess time and scores upon the usage of webbased
test, to compare students’ scores to paper-based test scores, to explore the advantages anddisadvantages, and
suggestions to improve the web-based learning method.
Method: This study randomly enlisted 60 medical students of Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
and divided them into web-based (n = 30) and paper- based test (n = 30) groups. Students answered 15 disaster
management questions and completed a questionnaire. The scores and times needed to answer the questions were
compared using the Mann-Whitney and Independent Sample tests.
Results: The duration to answer in the web-based group was shorter than in paper- based group (p = 0.001), but
the average scores difference was not significant (p = 0.169). In the web-based group, similar numbers of students
accessed the website during and after working hours. Survey questionnaire results showed that most students realized
the advantages of this program and gave appropriate suggestions.
Conclusion: Practicing clinical reasoning skills using web-based learning method is more time-efficient compared
to the paper-based test. Its high-accessibility improves the learning interest and motivation of the student, with an
equal outcome to the paper-based test.
reasoning skills. Currently, many learning methods are being developed using web-based environment to replace
paper-based because they are more efficient in terms of paper usage and are flexible for a student in accessing
materials. This study aims to explore student’s working durationaccess time and scores upon the usage of webbased
test, to compare students’ scores to paper-based test scores, to explore the advantages anddisadvantages, and
suggestions to improve the web-based learning method.
Method: This study randomly enlisted 60 medical students of Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
and divided them into web-based (n = 30) and paper- based test (n = 30) groups. Students answered 15 disaster
management questions and completed a questionnaire. The scores and times needed to answer the questions were
compared using the Mann-Whitney and Independent Sample tests.
Results: The duration to answer in the web-based group was shorter than in paper- based group (p = 0.001), but
the average scores difference was not significant (p = 0.169). In the web-based group, similar numbers of students
accessed the website during and after working hours. Survey questionnaire results showed that most students realized
the advantages of this program and gave appropriate suggestions.
Conclusion: Practicing clinical reasoning skills using web-based learning method is more time-efficient compared
to the paper-based test. Its high-accessibility improves the learning interest and motivation of the student, with an
equal outcome to the paper-based test.
Keywords
Web-based learning, time efficiency, undergraduate, clinical reasoning
Full Text:
PDFReferences
- Irfannuddin I. Knowledge and critical thinking skills increase clinical reasoning ability in urogenital disorders: a Universitas Sriwijaya Medical Faculty experience. Medical Journal of Indonesia. 2009 Jan 1;18(1):53.
- Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Cheung RB, Sloane DM, Silber JH. Educational levels of hospital nurses and surgical patient mortality. Jama. 2003 Sep 24;290(12):1617-23.
- Widyandana D, Majoor G, Scherpbier A. Transfer of medical students’ clinical skills learned in a clinical laboratory to the care of real patients in the clinical setting: the challenges and suggestions of students in a developing country. Education for Health. 2010 Nov 1;23(3):339.
- Trelease RB. From chalkboard, slides, and paper to e‐learning: How computing technologies have transformed anatomical sciences education. Anatomicalscienceseducation. 2016 Nov;9(6):583- 602.
- Sharaf F, Alnohair S. Comparison of medical students’ learning approaches between electronic and hard copy team-based learning. International journal of health sciences. 2017 Jan;11(1):1.
- Zhang D, Zhao JL, Zhou L, Nunamaker Jr JF. Can e-learning replace classroom learning?. Communications of the ACM. 2004 May 1;47(5): 75-9.
- Brown BW, Saks DH. Measuring the effects of instructional time on student learning: Evidence from the beginning teacher evaluation study. American Journal of Education. 1986 Aug 1;94(4):480-500.
- Duffy T, Gilbert I, Kennedy D, Kwong PW. Comparing distance education and conventional education: observations from a comparative study of post- registration nurses. ALT-J. 2002 Jan 1;10(1):70-82.
- Benjamin J, Groner J, Walton J, Noritz G, Gascon GM, Mahan JD. Learning in a web-based world: an innovative approach to teach physical examination skills in patients with neurodisability. Academic pediatrics. 2018 Aug 1;18(6):714-6.
- Telang A, Rathod S, Supe A, Nebhinani N, Mathai S. Faculty views on competency-Based medical education during mentoring and learning web sessions: An observational study. Journal of Education Technology in Health Sciences. 2017 Apr 29;4(1):9-13.
- Kitching F, Winbolt M, MacPhail A, Ibrahim JE. Web-based social media for professional medical education: Perspectives of senior stakeholders in the nursing home sector. Nurse education today. 2015 Dec 1;35(12):1192-8.
- Weber A. Web-based learning in Qatar and the GCC states. Available at SSRN 2825912. 2016 Aug 18.
- Vogelsang M, Rockenbauch K, Wrigge H, Heinke W, Hempel G. Medical Education for “Generation Z”: Everything online?!–An analysis of Internet- based media use by teachers in medicine. GMS journal for medical education. 2018;35(2).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.45369
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 2196 | views : 2093Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Widyandana doni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by:
JPKI Stats