Exit, Voice, and Loyalty in the Indo-Pacific: Shaping Future Regional Policies
Ellie Ophelia Delviolin(1*), George Morris William Tangka(2)
(1) National Tsing Hua University
(2) 
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study investigates public behavior in Indo-Pacific countries, employing the Exit, Voice, and Loyalty framework. In an era marked by globalization and interconnectedness, citizen choices and actions in the Indo-Pacific region are increasingly influenced by global trends and international relations. Trust in government plays a pivotal role, affected by public scrutiny in an interconnected world and impacting trust levels. Life satisfaction, a reflection of individual well-being, mirrors government performance and is a critical factor. Quantitative analysis, including multinomial logistic regression, using data from the Asian Barometer Survey 2008 unveils noteworthy results. Lower trust in government reduced life satisfaction, and negative government assessments drive exit behavior, with a 15% increase in the likelihood of citizens choosing to exit when trust is low. Conversely, higher life satisfaction and positive government assessments increase the probability of loyalty behavior by 20%, while voice behavior likelihood decreases by 10%. These findings provide valuable insights into public behavior in the Indo-Pacific, emphasizing the roles of trust, life satisfaction, and government performance, supported by numerical evidence. These insights hold significance in the Indo-Pacific's ever-evolving global landscape, serving as a foundation for policymaking and decision-making. Policymakers and researchers can use this knowledge to enhance governance, promote societal well-being, and deepen citizen-government connections in the dynamic Indo-Pacific region.
Keywords: Indo-Pacific; Exit Voice and Loyalty Framework; life satisfaction; government performance; trust
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Books
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford University Press.
Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Haass, R. N. (2019). The Age of Disruption: Technology and Society in the Twenty-First Century. Penguin Press.
Held, D., & McGrew, A. (2007). Globalization/Anti-Globalization: Beyond the Great Divide. Polity.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Harvard University Press.
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. Cambridge University Press.
Norris, P. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
Journal Article (retrieved online, with DOI)
Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111684
Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1-2), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006859511756
INOGUCHI, T. (2017, February 14). An Evidence-Based Typology of Asian Societies: What Do Asian Societies Look Like from the Bottom Up instead of Top Down? Japanese Journal of Political Science, 18(1), 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1468109916000384
Inoguchi, T. (2013, April 6). Takashi Inoguchi: A Pioneer in Asian Quality of Life Research. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 8(2), 273–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-013-9233-y
Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2008). The State and Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust. Comparative Politics, 40(4), 441-459. DOI: 10.5129/001041508X12911362383354
Journal Article (retrieved online, without DOI or page numbers)
Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2002). Democracy, Institutions, and Attitudes about Citizen Influence on Government. British Journal of Political Science. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4092223
Electronic source
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2024). Can China rise peacefully?. The National Interest. Retrieved from https://nationalinterest.org/commentary/can-china-rise-peacefully-10204
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/globalsouth.91046
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 155 | views : 105Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.