Should Robots Be Like Humans? A Pragmatic Approach to Social Robotics

Budi Hartanto

doi:10.22146/jf.87121

Should Robots Be Like Humans? A Pragmatic Approach to Social Robotics

https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.87121

Budi Hartanto^(1*)

(1) The Society for Philosophy and Technology, Tangerang, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This paper describes the instrumentalizing aspects of social robots, which generate the term pragmatic social robot. In contrast to humanoid robots, pragmatic social robots (PSRs) are defined by their instrumentalizing aspects, which consist of language, skill, and artificial intelligence. These technical aspects of social robots have led to the tendency to attribute a selfhood characteristic or anthropomorphism. Anthropomorphism can raise problems of responsibility and the ontological problems of human-technology relations. As a result, there is an antinomy in the research and development of pragmatic social robotics, considering that they are expected to achieve similarity with humans in terms of completing works. How can we avoid anthropomorphism in the research and development of PSRs while ensuring their flexibility? In response to this issue, I suggest intuition should be instrumentalized to advance PSRs’ social skills. Intuition, as theorized by Henry Bergson and Efraim Fischbein, overcomes the capacity of logical analysis to solve problems. Robots should be like humans in the sense that their instrumentalizing aspects meet the criteria for the value of human social skills.

Keywords

Social Robots, Instrumentalization, Anthropomorphism, Artificial Intuition

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anderson, M. (2018). Artificial Intuition. Artificial Intuition https://artificial-intuition.com/

Bergson, H. (1955). Introduction to metaphysics (2nd edition). Bobbs-Merrill. The Little Library of Liberal Arts.

Bryson, J. J., & Theodorou, A. (2019). How society can maintain human-centric Artificial Intelligence. In M. Toivonen & E. Saari (Eds.), Human-Centered Digitalization and Services, 19, 305–323. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7725-9_16

Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI ethics. The MIT Press Essential Knowledge Series.

Coeckelbergh, M. (2021). Three responses to anthropomorphism in social robotics: towards a critical, relational, and hermeneutic approach. International Journal of Social Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00770-0

Combes, M. (2012). Gilbert Simondon and the philosophy of the transindividual. MIT Press.

Crew, B. (2015). Driverless cars could reduce traffic fatalities by up to 90%, says report. https://www.sciencealert.com/driverless-cars-could-reduce-traffic-fatalities-by-up-to-90-says-report.

Deleuze, G. (1991). Bergsonism. Zone Books, New York.

Dewey, J. (1998). The essential Dewey, volume I: pragmatism, education, democracy (L. A. Hickman & T. M. Alexander, Eds.). Indiana University Press.

Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1985). Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. The Free Press: A Division of Macmillan, Inc.

Fischbein, E. (2002). Intuition in science and mathematics: an educational approach. Springer Netherlands.

Heidegger, M. (1973). Being and time. Oxford Basil Blackwell.

Ihde, D. (1979). Technics and praxis. D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: from garden to earth. Indiana University Press.

Lanur, A. (2000). Aku disandera – aku dan orang lain, menurut Emmanuel Levinas. https://www.berandanegeri.com/

Law, J., & Hassard, J. (1999). Actor Network Theory and after. Blackwell Publishers.

Magnis-Suseno, F. (2013). Dari Mao ke Marcuse: percikan filsafat Marxis Pasca-Lenin. Penerbit GPU.

Rosheim, M. E. (2006). Leonardo’s lost robot. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg.

Schofield, J. (2019). Computer chatbot “Eugene Goostman” passes the Turing test. https://www.zdnet.com/article/computer-chatbot-eugene-goostman-passes-the-turing-test/

Seibt, J., Nørskov, M., Andersen, T., & Gebhard, P. (2018). Five principles of integrative social robotics. In M. Coeckelbergh, J. Loh, M. Funk, M. Seibt, & J. Nørskov (Eds.), Envisioning robots in society – power, politics, and public space (pp. 28-36). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-931-7-28

Seibt, J., Vestergaard, C., & Damholdt, M. F. (2020). Sociomorphing, not anthropomorphizing: Towards a typology of experienced sociality. In J. Seibt, M. Nørskov, & S. Schack Andersen (Eds.), Culturally Sustainable Social Robotics: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2020 (pp. 48-59). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200900

Searle, J. (1997). The mystery of consciousness. New York Review Books.

Simondon, G. (1990). On the mode of existence of technical objects. University of Western Ontario.

Tabora, V. (2018). Artificial intuition and reinforcement learning, the next steps in machine learning. Becoming Human. https://becominghuman.ai/artificial-intuition-and-reinforcement-learning-the-next-steps-in-machine-learning-6f2abeb9926b.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.87121