Komunikasi, Legitimasi, dan Mediasi: Kritik atas Hegemoni Pemaknaan dalam Ruang Publik

https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.23203

Sindung Tjahyadi(1*)

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The shoping of modern society  tends to refuse my
theological legitimation. This pattern leads the society face
serious problems because every domain in human life has
developed in autonomous basic legitimation. There is no system
which organizes rules to knowledge, science, ethics, politics, and
laws. Mass media as free market of ideologiea is a power which
dominates the significance of  public sphere. This paper concerns
in discussive the problem of communication as mediation of
meaning in modern society. Based on an analysis of
communication aspects in modern society, we draw the prospective
conclusion on which to build the future. 
 


Keywords


Communication, legitimation, mediation, hegemony, public sphere.

Full Text:

PDF


References

Barbero, J. Martin., 1993, Communication, Culture, and

Hegemony. From the media to Mediations,

London, Sage.

Elliot, Philip, 1986, “Intellectuals, the ‘information society’ and

the disapperance of the public sphere” dalam: Collins,

Richard, et all, ed., 1986, Media, Culture, and

Society. A critical reader, London, Sage.

Habermas, Jürgen, 1979, Communication and Evolution of

Society (asli: 1976, “Sprachpragmatig und

Philosophie”, dan “Zur Rekonstruction des

Historischen Materialismus”, transl by Thomas

McCarthy), Beacon Press, Boston.

________________, 1989, The Structural Transformation of

the Public Sphere, An inquiry into a category of

Bourgeois Society (Asli: 1962, “Strukturwandel der

Jurnal Filsafat Vol. 16, Nomor 3, Desember 2006

Offentlicheit”, trnsl. by Thomas Burger with the

assistance of Frederick Lawrence), Polity Press,

Cambridge.

________________, 1998/1996, Between Facts and Norms:

Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and

Democracy (asli: 1992, “Faftizität und Geltung:

Beitrage Zur Diskurstheorie Des Rechts und Des

Demokratischen Rechtsstaats”, transl and

introduction by William Regh), Cambridge, MIT

Press.

________________, 2001, The Postnational Constellation,

Political essays (asli: 1998: “Die postnationale

Konstellation: Politische Essays”, translated, edited,

with introduction by Max Pensky), Cambridge, Polity

Press.

Kellner, Douglass, 2000, Habermas, the Public Sphere, and

Democracy: A Critical Intervention,

http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/kellner.html

(download: 9 Januari 2003)

Laclau, Ernesto, & Mouffe, Chantal, 1999/1985, Hegemony and

Socialist Startegy, Towards a radical democratics

politics, London, Verso.

Miller, Katherine, 2002, Communications Theories:

Perspectives, Processes, and Contexs, Boston,

McGraw Hill.

Morris, Martin, 2001, “Deliberation and Decontruction: Two

Views on the Space of a Post-National Democracy”,

dalam: Canadian Journal of Political Science,

XXXIV: 4 (December 2001), Canadian Political

Science Asociation, pp.763-790

Ritzer, George, 2003, Contemporary Sociological Theory and

Its Classical Roots, New York, The MacGeaw-Hill

Companies.

Rorty, Richard, 1999, Philosophy and Social Hope, London,

Penguin Books.

Sindung Tjahyadi, Komunikasi, Legitimasi, dan Mediasi...

Woodward, Kath, 2003, Social Sciences: The Big Issues,

London, Routledge.

-------------, 1998, Time Special Issue: The New Age of

Discovery, A Celebration of mankind’s

exploration of the unknown, Hongkong, Time Asia.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.23203

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1319 | views : 2127

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Filsafat

Jurnal Filsafat Indexed by:

Google ScholarSinta (Science and Technology Index)


Jurnal Filsafat ISSN 0853-1870 (print), ISSN 2528-6811 (online)