Publication in Medical Education Scientific Area: A Challenging Journey in Disseminating Scientific Writing in Health Profession Education

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.96347

Hikmawati Nurrokhmanti(1*), Luthfi Saiful Arif(2), Silvia Mustika Sari(3), Widyandana Widyandana(4), Mora Claramita(5)

(1) Department of Medical Education and Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine-Public Health-Nursing, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta
(2) Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Jendral Achmad Yani, Jawa Barat
(3) Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Jendral Achmad Yani, Jawa Barat
(4) Department of Medical Education and Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine-Public Health-Nursing, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta
(5) Department of Medical Education and Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine-Public Health-Nursing, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: Publications in the medical education field need more attention. It was shown by the MERSQI data score that there is no significant difference between medical education publications in the US (Society of General Internal Medicine, 44,4%) and Turkish (Turkish National Medical Education Congresses and Symposia, 11,3%) in 2014/2015. Therefore, specific strategies should be implemented to raise the quality and quantity of publications in the medical education area. With this recommendation, the number of publications in the medical education area is expected to increase.

Gaps: In a study on the quality of publication in Turkish National Medical Education Congresses and Symposia, there is a significant difference in MERSQI score between unpublished (oral/poster presentation) and published papers.1 It is indicated that the quality of scientific papers needs to be increased. While in Indonesia, no further study is related to the quantity and quality of published papers. It is assumed that publication problems in the medical education field stem from the quality of scientific papers and could relate to Indonesian scholars' false publication strategy. 

Recommendation: The quality of scientific publications in Indonesia needs an improvement strategy that should be implemented in every scientific institution in Indonesia, starting from the master's degree level. The increasing proportion of research and any supporting material is expected to increase publication with high-quality research. The following recommendation is about the strategy of publishing the paper, which begins with selecting the fit or right scientific journal, followed by increasing scholar adherence to the journal's requirements. 


Keywords


medical education, publication, challenges, scientific paper quality, scientific paper quantity

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Sarı E, Nteli Chatzioglou G, Aydın ÇY, Sarı F, Tokat T, Gürses İA. Publication rates of congress abstracts is associated with abstract quality: Evaluation of Turkish National Medical Education Congresses and Symposia between 2010 and 2014 using MERSQI. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):1–8.

  2. Sawatsky AP, Beckman TJ, Edakkanambeth Varayil J, Mandrekar JN, Reed DA, Wang AT. Association Between Study Quality and Publication Rates of Medical Education Abstracts Presented at the Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(8):1172–7.

  3. Caroline V., Fry, John, L., Shannon, T., Ranking researcher: Evidence from Indonesia. Research Policy,2023.Vol.52, No. 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104753.

  4. Gottlieb M, Dehon E, Jordan J, Bentley S, Ranney ML, Lee S, et al. Getting published in medical education: Overcoming barriers to scholarly production. West J Emerg Med. 2018;19(1):1–6.

  5. Englesbe M, Markovac J. Teaching Publishing in Medical Education—An Overview [Internet]. Medical and Scientific Publishing: Author, Editor, and Reviewer Perspectives. Elsevier; 2017. 1–6 p. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809969-8.00001-2

  6. Widyahening IS, Wangge G, Saldi SRF, Lestari BW, Apriani L, Sastroasmoro S, et al. Quality and reporting of publications by Indonesian researchers: A literature survey. J Evid Based Med. 2014;7(3):163–71.

  7. Dolmans DHJM, van der Vleuten CPM. Research in medical education: practical impact on medical training and future challenges. Tijdschr voor Med Onderwijs. 2010;29(1):3–9.

  8. Meyrick J. What is good qualitative research? A first step towards a comprehensive approach to judging rigour/quality. J Health Psychol. 2006;11(5):799–808.

  9. Westerman MA. What counts as “good” quantitative research and what can we say about when to use quantitative and/or qualitative methods? New Ideas Psychol. 2006;24(3):263–74.

  10. Bakioglu A, Kurmaz Z. Quality criteria of research perceived by academics in social sciences at higher education . US-China Educ Rev. 2009;6(3):1–13.

  11. Ferris L., Winker M. Research integrity corner: special issue on predatory journals. Biochem Medica. 2017;27(10):279–84.

  12. Chandra A, Dasgupta S. Predatory Journals: What the Researchers and Authors Should Know. Am J Med. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.02.015.

  13. Shrestha J. Authors beware! Publishing in predatory journals is harmful. J Agric Nat Resour. 2020;3(2):1–8.

  14. Brandts-Longtin O, Lalu MM, Adie EA, Albert MA, Almoli E, Almoli F, et al. Assessing the impact of predatory journals on policy and guidance documents: a cross-sectional study protocol. BMJ Open. 2022;12(4):10–4.

  15. Irfanullah HM. So, what does resilience mean for scholarly publishing? Learn Publ. 2021;34(1):57–63.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.96347

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 85 | views : 29

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Hikmawati Nurrokhmanti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by:

  

 JPKI Stats