E-Learning in Anatomy: Medical Students' Perspectives on Synchronous and Asynchronous Lab Sessions

Ryzufar Altarif Farsal; Nandina Oktavia; Gita Tiara Dewi Nasution; Putri Halleyana Adrikni Rahman

doi:10.22146/jpki.82355

E-Learning in Anatomy: Medical Students' Perspectives on Synchronous and Asynchronous Lab Sessions

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.82355

Ryzufar Altarif Farsal^(1*), Nandina Oktavia⁽²⁾, Gita Tiara Dewi Nasution⁽³⁾, Putri Halleyana Adrikni Rahman⁽⁴⁾

(1) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung – Indonesia
(2) Departemen Ilmu Kedokteran Dasar, Divisi Anatomi, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung
(3) Departemen Ilmu Kedokteran Dasar, Divisi Anatomi, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung
(4) Departemen Ilmu Kedokteran Dasar, Divisi Anatomi, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Background: The Covid-19 pandemic has become a global health disaster, various sectors have been affected including the education sector. Online learning is then carried out as an alternative solution to carry out learning. This online learning is carried out in all elements of education including Universities. The intended online learning is divided into two methods, asynchronous and synchronous methods. The difference in these methods will certainly lead to different perceptions for each student, especially in anatomy laboratory learning.This stud aimed to find out the perception of Unpad Medical Faculty students towards the asynchronous and synchronous method of online anatomy laboratory learning..

Methods:This research is a quantitative cross-sectional descriptive studies and involved 129 respondents from student of Unpad Faculty of Medicine students class of 2019. This was done using Google Forms which contained a questionnaire and informed consent sheet.

Results: FK Unpad online anatomy laboratory learning falls under good category, with each index value: perception of learning experience: 76.2%, perception of lecturer capabilities: 77.1%, perception of facilities and infrastructure: 83.7 %.

Conclusion: Online anatomy laboratory learning can still be continued by combining both asynchronous and synchronous methods, so that learning can take place more effectively.

Keywords

anatomy laboratory, asynchronous, synchronous, online laboratory learning, perception

Full Text:

PDF

References

Peta Sebaran [Internet]. [cited 2022 Feb 16]. Available from: https://covid19.go.id/peta-sebaran/
Fyllos A, Kanellopoulos A, Kitixis P, Cojocari DV, Markou A, Raoulis V, et al. University students perception of online education: Is engagement enough? Acta Inform Medica. 2021;29(1):4–9.
Coman C, Țîru LG, Meseșan-Schmitz L, Stanciu C, Bularca MC. Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: Students’ perspective. Sustain. 2020;12(24):1–22.
Palopo UM. Palopo Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Daring Saat Pandemi Covid-19. 2021;3:70–82.
Kadir A. Pengaruh Kompetensi Dosen Dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Kemampuan Analisis Statistika Mahasiswa Ftik Iain Kendari. Al-Izzah J Hasil-Hasil Penelit. 2018;13(1):1.
Franchi T. The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Current Anatomy Education and Future Careers: A Student’s Perspective. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(3):312–5.
Patel SB, Mauro D, Fenn J, Sharkey DR, Jones C. Is dissection the only way to learn anatomy? Thoughts from students at a non-dissecting based medical school. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4(5):259–60.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI. kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id.
Priyastuti MT, Suhadi S. Kepuasaan Mahasiswa terhadap Pembelajaran Daring Selama Pandemi Covid-19. J Lang Heal. 2020;1(2):49–56.
Zimmerman BJ, Zimmerman BJ. Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner : An Overview Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner : An Overview. Theory Pract. 2010;5841(2002):64–70.
Mousavi A, Mohammadi A, Mojtahedzadeh R, Shirazi M, Rashidi H. E-learning educational atmosphere measure (EEAM): A new instrument for assessing e-students’ perception of educational environment. Res Learn Technol. 2020;28(January).
Maulana HA, Hamidi M. Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap Pembelajaran Daring pada Mata Kuliah Praktik di Pendidikan Vokasi. 2020;VIII:224–31.
Narayana IWG. Analisis terhadap hasil penggunaan metode pembelajaran synchronous dan asynchronous. Semin Nas Teknol Inf dan Multimed [Internet]. 2016;4(1):139–44.
Berry S. Educational Outcomes of Synchronous and Asynchronous High School Students: A Quantitative Causal-Comparative Study of Online Algebra 1. Sharon Berry. 2020;5(3):248–53.
Indarti I, Wahyuningsih U, Yulistiana Y, Suhartini R, Prihatina YI. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kepuasan Belajar Jarak Jauh Mahasiswa Vokasi Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. J Pendidik Teknol dan Kejuru. 2021;18(2):226.
Lisiswanti R. Peranan Dosen Pendidikan Kedokteran : The Role Of Medical Teacher : From The Medical Education Perspective. JK Unila. 2019;3(1):186–90.
Fitriyani Y, Fauzi I, Sari MZ. Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Pembelajaran Daring Selama Pandemik Covid-19. Profesi Pendidik Dasar. 2020;7(1):121–32.
Argaheni NB. Sistematik Review: Dampak Perkuliahan Daring Saat Pandemi COVID-19 Terhadap Mahasiswa Indonesia. PLACENTUM J Ilm Kesehat dan Apl. 2020;8(2):99.
Umam KLM. Problematika dan Efek Negatif Pembelajaran Daring Selama Pandemi COVID-19. Tarbiyatuna Kaji Pendidik Islam. 2021;5:202–17.
Darmawan E. Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Asynchronous Dalam Perancangan Aplikasi Simulasi Panduan Pecinta Alam. J Cloud Inf. 2018;3(2):13–9.
Novita M. Sarana Prasarana yang Baik menjadi bagian Ujung Tombak Keberhasilan Lembaga Pendidikan, Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam. Nur El-Islam. 2017;4(2):97–129.
LMS [Internet]. [cited 2022 Feb 21]. Available from: https://indonesiancloud.com/mengenal-apa-itu-learning-management-system/
Amalia RM, Darmayanti N, Sidiq II. Efektivitas Penggunaan LMS LiVE Unpad Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Daring. Semin Nas Teknol Pembelajaran 2021. 2021;
Sadikin A, Hamidah A. Pembelajaran Daring di Tengah Wabah Covid-19. Biodik. 2020;6(2):109–19.
Pandemi M, Fadhillah R. Penggunaan Teknologi dan Internet sebagai Media. 2020;