Inquiry Learning Methods to Increase Student Motivation and Learning Outcomes

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.80754

Sri Sundari(1*), Seftiani Utami(2)

(1) Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta
(2) Students of Master of Nursing Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: The current learning process has changed from teacher-centred learning (TCL) to student-centred learning (SCL). Therefore, innovative learning models are needed to improve student learning outcomes and motivation. This study aimed to measure the effect of inquiry learning methods on student motivation and learning outcomes.

Methods: This was a quasi-experimental approach with a pre-test and post-test control group approach. The samples were divided into 29 students as the intervention group and 29 students as the control group. The researcher used the MSLQ (Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire) to measure learning motivation. Meanwhile, to assess student learning outcomes, researchers used an assessment using the MCQ (multiple-choice question) learning outcomes evaluation method. The study's results were analysed using the paired sample t-test with a value of 0.05.

Results: The study results in the intervention group showed the average value of the pretest learning motivation was 135.33, and the posttest-3 was 158.03, while the pretest-3 was

68.43 and the posttest-3 was 83.03. The results of the different tests for learning motivation were obtained by pre-posttest-1 p-value of 0.012, pre-posttest-2 p-value of 0.000, pre-posttest-3 p-value of 0.001, while the study results from pre-posttest-1 to pre-posttest-3 obtained p-value = 0.000.

Conclusion: There is an influence of inquiry learning method on the motivation and learning outcomes of Nursing Students.


Keywords


inquiry learning, learning motivation, learning outcomes

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Jun WH, Le EJ, Park HJ, Chang AK, Kim MJ. Use of the 5E learning cycle model combined with problem-based learning for a fundamentals of nursing course. J Nurs Educ. 2013;52(12):681–9.

  2. Mody SK, Kiley J, Gawron L, Garcia P, Hammond C. Team-based learning: a novel approach to medical student education in family planning. Contraception. 2013;88(2):239–42.

  3. Syah M. Psikologi Belajar. Depok: Rajawali Pers; 2012.

  4. Yardimci F, Bektaş M, Özkütük N, Muslu GK, Gerçeker GÖ, Başbakkal Z. A study of the relationship between the study process, motivation resources, and motivation problems of nursing students in different educational systems. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;48:13–8.

  5. Chang C, Chang CK, Shih JL. Motivational strategies in a mobile inquiry-based language learning setting. System. 2016;59:100–19.

  6. Metwally NS, Ebrahim RM, Husseiny A. Effect of Inquiry-Based Learning versus Conventional Approach on Maternity Nursing Students’ Satisfaction, Motivation and Achievement. World Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2017;3(2):33–44.

  7. Thaiposri P, Wannapiroon P. Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills through Teaching and Learning by Inquiry-based Learning Activities Using Social Network and Cloud Computing. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;174(12):2137–44.

  8. Nybo L, May M. Effectiveness of inquiry-based learning in an undergraduate exercise physiology course. Adv Physiol Educ. 2015;39(2):76–80.

  9. Smallhorn M, Young J, Hunter N, Silva KB da. Inquiry-based learning to improve student engagement in a large first year topic. Student Success. 2015;6(2).

  10. Anstey LM. “Applying anatomy to something I care about”: Authentic inquiry learning and student experiences of an inquiry project. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(6):538–48.

  11. Yildirim N, Kurt S, Güneş L. Effects of inquiry-based learning activities on scientific process skills and academic achievement of preservice classroom teachers. Int J Acad Res. 2014;6(6):46–54.

  12. Hosnan M. Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia; 2014

  13. Mulyasa E. Revolusi dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Sesuai Standar Proses. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya; 2016

  14. Rahman A, Ahmar AS. Relationship between learning styles and learning achievement in mathematics based on gender. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education. 2017;15(1):74–7.

  15. Mullamaa K. Student Centered Teaching and Motivation. Adv Soc Sci Res J. 2017;4(16).

  16. Sardiman. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada; 2012.

  17. Hwang GJ, Lai CL, Wang SY. Seamless flipped learning: a mobile-technology enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. J Comput Educ. 2015;2(4):449– 73.

  18. Wang PH, Wu PL, Yu KW, Lin YX. Influence of implementing inquiry-based instruction on science learning motivation and interest: a perspective of comparison. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;174:1292–9.

  19. Yewang MUK, Degeng INS, Setyosari P, Sulton. The effect of guided inquiry learning method vs free inquiry aginst learning outcomes. In: Education in the 21th Century: Responding to Current Issues. 2016. p. 561–8.

  20. Buchbinder SB. Buku Ajar Manajemen Pelayanan Kesehatan. Jakarta: EGC; 2014.

  21. Kusurkar RA, Cate TJ Ten, Vos CMP, Westers P, Croiset G. How motivation affects academic performance: a structural equation modelling analysis. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013;18(1):57–69.

  22. Riyani Y. Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa. Jurnal EKSOS. 2012;8(1):19–25



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.80754

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 197 | views : 92

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Sri Sundari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by: