QUALITATIVE INTERVIEW WITH SENSITIVE PARTIPANTS

Rosaria Indah

doi:10.22146/jpki.64308

QUALITATIVE INTERVIEW WITH SENSITIVE PARTIPANTS

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.64308

Rosaria Indah^(1*)

(1) Faculty of Medicine Syiah Kuala University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Background: Interview is the most frequent data collection method utilized in qualitative research. It is used to explore perceptions and/or life experiences of participants related to a particular research topic. When a research investigates a traumatic topic, participants may show sensitive reactions. However, there is scant literature talks about these reactions and how researchers dealt with them, especially in Indonesian context. This case study aims to discuss the author’s experiences interviewing sensitive participants and ways she overcame dilemmas of stopping the interview or continuing it with caution.

Case discussion: The case study draws on reflective practices during interviewing 21 disaster-affected participants in a larger ethnographic study exploring medical education in Aceh, Indonesia, inspired by methodological memos written during data collection processes. Sensitive participants may offer three sensitive reactions: 1) Refuse to do interview, 2) regret the interview after revealing many traumatic experiences, 3) show negative symptoms such as crying during the interview. In dealing with these sensitive reactions, researchers may implement strategies, such as 1) conducting interview at a proper time, 2) avoiding ‘normalization’, 3) putting emotion provoking questions at the last part of an interview, 4) applying communication approaches, such as CARE communication dan 3L actions (Look, Listen, and Link), 5) offering participants some alternative ways to do interviews.

Conclusion: The findings suggest researchers exploring traumatic topics to prepare themselves with various interpersonal communication skills that are useful in showing acceptance toward sensitive reactions of their participants.

Keywords

disaster, interview, participant, reflectivity, sensitive, trauma.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications; 2016.

Rachmawati IN. Pengumpulan data dalam penelitian kualitatif: wawancara. J Keperawatan Indones. 2007;11(1):35–40.

Seidman I. Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers college press; 2013.

Hatch JA. Doing qualitative research in education settings. Suny Press; 2002.

Hakim LN. Ulasan Metodologi Kualitatif: Wawancara Terhadap Elit. Aspir J Masal-Masal Sos. 2013;4(2):165–72.

Rofi A, Doocy S, Robinson C. Tsunami mortality and displacement in Aceh province, Indonesia. Disasters. 2006;30(3):340–50.

Musa R, Draman S, Jeffrey S, Jeffrey I, Abdullah N, Halim NAM, et al. Post tsunami psychological impact among survivors in Aceh and West Sumatra, Indonesia. Compr Psychiatry. 2014;55:S13–6.

Indah R, Marisa M. Designing Disaster Management Course for Medical School in Disaster-Prone Area. In: Proceedings of The Annual International Conference, Syiah Kuala University-Life Sciences & Engineering Chapter [Internet]. Banda Aceh: Tsunami Disaster and Mitigation Research Center (TDMRC); 2011. p. 130–9. Available from: http://www.rp2u.unsyiah.ac.id/index.php/welcome/prosesCariPublikasi/903/197407142005012001/Rosaria%20Indah/5

Indah R, Maulana R. Analysis on the quality of test items on disaster management block. In: Proceedings of The Annual International Conference, Syiah Kuala University-Life Sciences & Engineering Chapter. 2013.

Indah R. Community-based medical education: Exploring doctor-patient interactions in post-disaster Aceh, Indonesia [Internet] [Doctor of Philosophy Ph.D.]. Community-based medical education: Exploring doctor-patient interactions in post-disaster Aceh, Indonesia. University of Sydney; 2019. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/2123/22445

O’Reilly K. Key concepts in ethnography. Sage; 2009.

Regmi KD. The political economy of 2015 Nepal earthquake: Some critical reflections. Asian Geogr. 2016;33(2):77–96.

Atallah DG, Shapiro ER, Al-Azraq N, Qaisi Y, Suyemoto KL. Decolonizing qualitative research through transformative community engagement: Critical investigation of resilience with Palestinian refugees in the West Bank. Qual Res Psychol. 2018;15(4):489–519.

Desmond M. Evicted: Poverty and profit in the American city. Crown; 2016.

Indah R. Insider Dilemmas: An Ethnographic Study on Community-Based Medical Education in Aceh, Indonesia. Explorations. 2019;15:86–92.

Indah R. Valuing subaltern and grieving patients: Power issues in doctor-patient interactions in post-disaster Aceh, Indonesia. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021;102326.

Collogan LK, Tuma F, Dolan-Sewell R, Borja S, Fleischman AR. Ethical issues pertaining to research in the aftermath of disaster. J Trauma Stress. 2004;17(5):363–72.

Indah R. Probing problems: Dilemmas of conducting an ethnographic study in a disaster-affected area. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018;31:799–805.

Lawrence-Wood E, Van Hooff M, Baur J, McFarlane AC. Re-experiencing phenomena following a disaster: The long-term predictive role of intrusion symptoms in the development of post-trauma depression and anxiety. J Affect Disord. 2016;190:278–81.

Day KW, Lawson G, Burge P. Clinicians’ experiences of shared trauma after the shootings at Virginia Tech. J Couns Dev. 2017;95(3):269–78.

Sphere Project. Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response. Practical Action Publishing; 2011.

Gibbs L, Molyneaux R, Whiteley S, Block K, Harms L, Bryant RA, et al. Distress and satisfaction with research participation: Impact on retention in longitudinal disaster research. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018;27:68–74.

Atallah DG. Toward a decolonial turn in resilience thinking in disasters: Example of the Mapuche from southern Chile on the frontlines and faultlines. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2016;19:92–100.

Bickley L, Szilagyi PG. Bates’ guide to physical examination and history-taking. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.

Platt FW. Conversation repair: Case studies in doctor-patient communication. Little, Brown Medical Division; 1995.

WHO. Psychological first aid: Guide for field workers. World Health Organization; 2011.

Heath J, Williamson H, Williams L, Harcourt D. “It’s just more personal”: Using multiple methods of qualitative data collection to facilitate participation in research focusing on sensitive subjects. Appl Nurs Res. 2018;43:30–5.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.64308