ADAPTING THE OLDENBURG BURNOUT INVENTORY INTO BAHASA INDONESIA FOR MEASURING BURNOUT IN MEDICAL RESIDENTS

Annang Giri Moelyo; Muchtar Hanafi

doi:10.22146/jpki.56213

ADAPTING THE OLDENBURG BURNOUT INVENTORY INTO BAHASA INDONESIA FOR MEASURING BURNOUT IN MEDICAL RESIDENTS

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.56213

Annang Giri Moelyo^(1*), Muchtar Hanafi⁽²⁾

(1) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(2) Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Background: Burnout is common among medical residents, and a non-commercial tool for assessing burnout for medical residents is needed. This study aimed to adapt the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) in Bahasa Indonesia for medical residents and to analyze its validity and reliability.

Case Discussion: The English version of OLBI was forward and backward translated to and from Bahasa Indonesia by English-language translation experts, and was appropriately modified by the authors. The respondents of the questionnaire were taken from pediatric residents in the first trial (48 subjects), and from internal medicine, pediatric, dermatology, surgery, and neurology residents in the second trial (109 subjects). The item-test correlation to measured construct validity was good for both trials. A confirmatory factor analysis was then undertaken to evaluate the goodness of fit (GOF), the root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA), comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR), and coefficient of determination (CD) in the second trial. The results of the one-factor model and multidimensional GOF of the 16 items were unsatisfactory (χ²<0.05 and RMSEA>0.08). The GOF of the two-factor analysis of burnout with 8 items (3 exhaustion items and 5 disengagement items) created the following results: χ²=0.378; RMSEA=0.025; CFI=0.995; TLI=0.993; SRMR=0.036; and CD=0.898. The Cronbach’s alphas, for internal consistency reliability, in the first trial, second trial, and final model were 0.73, 0.87, 0.83, and 0.79, respectively.

Conclusion: An 8-items modified Bahasa Indonesia translation of the OLBI for medical residents to measure burnout has good reliability and validity.

Keywords

burnout, medical residents, Oldenburg Burnout Inventory, Bahasa Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF

References

1. van Vendeloo SN, Godderis L, Brand PLP, Verheyen KCPM, Rowell SA. Resident burnout: evaluating the role of the learning environment. BMC Med Educ. 2018; 18(54): 1-8.

2. Baer TE, Feraco AM, Sagalowsky ST, Williams D, Litman HJ, Vinci RJ. Pediatric resident burnout and attitudes toward patients. Pediatrics. 2017; 139(3). doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2163

3. IsHak WW, Lederer S, Mandili C, et al. Burnout during residency training: a literature review. J Grad Med Educ. 2009; 1(2): 236-242. doi:10.4300/jgme-d-09-00054.1

4. Rodrigues H, Cobucci R, Oliveira A, et al. Burnout syndrome among medical residents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018; 13(11): 1-17. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206840

5. Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP, Wilmar B. Schaufeli, Schwab RL. Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) - Assessments, Tests. Mindgarden. https://www.mindgarden.com/117-maslach-burnout-inventory#horizontalTab1. Published 2019. Accessed February 26, 2020.

6. Demerouti E, Bakker AB. The Oldenburg burnout inventory: a good alternative to measure burnout and engagement. In: J. R. B. Halbesleben, ed. Handbook of Stress and Burnout in Health Care. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science; 2008: 1-25.

7. Mahadi NF, Chin RWA, Chua YY, et al. Malay Language Translation and Validation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory Measuring Burnout. Educ Med J. 2018; 10(2): 27-40. doi:10.21315/eimj2018.10.2.4

8. Sinval J, Queirós C, Pasian S, Marôco J. Transcultural adaptation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) for Brazil and Portugal. Front Psychol. 2019; 10(MAR). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00338

9. Halbesleben JRB, Demerouti E. The construct validity of an alternative measure of burnout: Investigating the English translation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory. Work Stress. 2005; 19(3): 208-220. doi:10.1080/02678370500340728

10. Campos JADB, Carlotto MS, Marôco J. Oldenburg burnout inventory-student version: cultural adaptation and validation into Portuguese. Psicol Reflex e Crit. 2012; 25(4): 709-718. doi:10.1590/S0102-79722012000400010

11. Qiao H, Schaufeli WB. The convergent validity of four burnout measures in a Chinese sample: a confirmatory factor-analytic approach. Appl Psychol. 2011; 60(1): 87-111. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00428.x

12. Sedlar N, Šprah L, Tement S, Sočan G. Internal structure of an alternative measure of burnout: Study on the Slovenian adaptation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI). Burn Res. 2015; 2(1): 1-7. doi:10.1016/j.burn.2015.02.001

13. Tipa RO, Tudose C, Pucarea VL. Measuring Burnout Among Psychiatric Residents Using the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) Instrument. J Med Life. 2019; 12(4): 354-360. doi:10.25122/jml-2019-0089

14. Zis P, Anagnostopoulos F, Sykioti P. Burnout in medical residents: A study based on the job demands-resources model. Sci World J. 2014; 2014. doi:10.1155/2014/673279

15. Puranitee P, Stevens FFCJ, Pakakasama S, et al. Exploring burnout and the association with the educational climate in pediatric residents in Thailand. BMC Med Educ. 2019; 19(1): 245. doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1687-7

16. Maslach, C.; Jackson, S.E.; Leiter MP. Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. 4th ed. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden, Inc.; 2016.

17. Baka Ł, Basińska BA. Psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI). Med Pr. 2016; 67(1): 29-41. doi:10.13075/mp.5893.00353

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.56213