FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE SATISFACTION OF STUDENT IN THE MEDICAL RESIDENCY PROGRAM

Vitriana Biben; Dian Marta Sari; Farida Arisanti; Sunaryo B Sastradimadja

doi:10.22146/jpki.41844

FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE SATISFACTION OF STUDENT IN THE MEDICAL RESIDENCY PROGRAM

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.41844

Vitriana Biben^(1*), Dian Marta Sari⁽²⁾, Farida Arisanti⁽³⁾, Sunaryo B Sastradimadja⁽⁴⁾

(1) Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung, Indonesia
(2) Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung, Indonesia
(3) Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung, Indonesia
(4) Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Background: A high demand of physiatrist should be supported by quality assurance in education system of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (PMR) residency program, that could be done by evaluating satisfaction of its service users. This study was conducted to find the dimensions of service quality that influences the students satisfaction.

Methods: A cross-sectional study with fifty subjects using total sampling technique was conducted. Service quality was evaluated using ServQual questionnaire consisted of five dimensions: ‘tangible’, ‘reliability’, ‘responsiveness’, ‘assurance’ and ‘empathy’. Statistical analysis consisted of bivariate analysis followed by a multivariate analysis was performed to determine the most significant dimension associated with student satisfaction which was measured using Likert scale.

Results: Bivariate analysis revealed that all dimensions had significant association with satisfaction (p value < 0,05) except for ‘tangible’(p value = 0,060). Further multivariate analysis resulted in ‘reliability’ dimension as the most significant dimension associated with satisfaction (p value = 0,005; Adjusted OR = 142,67; CI 95% = 15,460-1316,587).

Conclusion: Reliability is the most significant dimension associated with student satisfaction. Improvement of this dimension, followed by other significant dimensions would lead to satisfaction of the students.

Keywords

Evaluation study; physical medicine and rehabilitation; satisfaction; service quality

Full Text:

PDF

References

Organization of Resident Representatives. Association of American Medical Colleges. Defining the Key elements of an Optimal Residency Program. May 2001.

Atsawarungruangkit A. Relationship of residency program chracteristics with pass rate of the American Board of Internal Medicine certifying exam. 2015. Medical Education Online 20:1.

Persatuan Dokter Spesialis Rehabilitasi Medik Indonesia. White Book Kedokteran Fisik dan Rehabilitasi. 1st Edition. Jakarta: PT Batu Merah; 2012.

Şavga, L. Quality assurance of higher education interms of the national education performance and competitiveness growth. Economy Transdisciplinarity Cognition. 2013;16:43-48.

Aldeman L, Towers S, Bannah S. Student feedback systems in high education: a focused literature review and environmental scan. Quality in Higher education. 2012;18(3):261-80.

Tessema MT, Ready K, You WC. Factors affecting college students satisfactions with major curriculum: Evidence from nine years of data. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 2012;2(2):34-44.

Yarris LM , Brunnet PH, Fu R. Attending and Resident Satisfaction with Feedback in the Emergency Department. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2007;8(3):109.

Bahadori M, Mousavi SM, Sadeghifar J, Haghi M. Reliability and Perfomance of SEVQUAL Survei in Evaluating Quality of Medical Education Services. Internasional Journal of Hospital Research. 2013. 2(1): 39-44. www.ijhr.iums.ac.ir

Parasuraman A, Zeithami VA, Berry LL. Servqual: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing. 1988;64(1).

Ziaee V, Ahmadinejad Z, Morravedji AR. An evaluation on Medical Students’ Satisfaction with Clinical Education and its Effective Factors. Med Educ Online [serial online]. 2004;9:8. Available from http://www.med-ed-online.org

Evaluasi Diri Program Studi Pendidikan Dokter Spesialis I Ilmu Kedokteran Fisik dan Rehabilitasi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung. Akreditasi Program Studi Dokter Spesialis. Jakarta: LAM-PT KES, 2014.

Prytowsky JB, Bordage G. An outcomes research perpective on medical education: the predominance of trainee assessment and satisfaction. Med Edu. 2001; 35(4): 331-6

Khan MM, Ahmed I, Nawaz MM. Student’s Perspective of Service Quality in Higher Learning Institutions; An evidence Based Approach. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 2011;2(11):159.

Sujatmiko SP, Soenoko R, Astuti M. Upaya Peningkatan Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa Berdasarkan Hasil Analisis Metode Servqual dan Regresi Liner Berganda (Studi Kasus Jurusan Teknik Mesin Universitas di Malang). Jemis. 2013;1(1).

Çerri S. Assessing The Quality Of Higher Education Services Using A Modified Servqual Scale. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica. 2012;14(2):664.

Aghamolaei T, Zare S. Quality gap of educational services in viewpoints of students in Hormozgan University of medical sciences. BMC Med Educ 2008;8(34).

Yousapronpaiboon K. SERVQUAL: Measuring higher education service quality in Thailand. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 116: 1088 – 1095.

Hasan HF. Service Quality and Student Satisfaction: A Case Study at Private Higher Education Institutions. Business Reasearch. 2008:163.

Tamnge NR. Regresi logistik biner dalam menentukan pengaruh kualitas pelayanan terhadap kepuasan mahasiswa fakultas keguruan dan ilmu pendidikan universitas muhammadiyah Surabaya. Must. Juni 2016;4(1).

Palli JG, Mamilla R. Students opinion of service quality in the field of higher education. Creative Education. 2012;3(4): 430-8

Cochran A, Melby S, Neumayer LA. An internet-based survei of factors influencing medical student selection of a general surgery career. The American Journal of Surgery. 189 (2005) 742-746

Losyk B. Generation X: What they think and what they plan to do. Public Management. 1997; 79:4-5

Mohr NM, Moreno-Walton L, Mills AM, Brunett PH, Promes SB. Generational Influences in Academic Emergency Medicine: Teaching and Learning, Mentoring and Technology (Part I). Acad emerg Med. 2011. 18(2): 190-199

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.41844