THE RELATIONSHIPS OF STUDENTS ADMISSION PROCESS AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.33403

Asty Amalia Nurhadi(1*), Shelly Salmah(2), Muhammad Nasrum Massi(3), Firdaus Kasim(4)

(1) Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine Hasanuddin University, Makassar - INDONESIA
(2) Department of Histology, Faculty of Medicine Hasanuddin University, Makassar - INDONESIA
(3) Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Hasanuddin University, Makassar - INDONESIA
(4) 5Department of Public and Community Health, Faculty of Medicine Hasanuddin University, Makassar - INDONESIA
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: The selection process in medical schools should be able to identify individuals that most
probably will successfully complete their education. In Faculty of Medicine Hasanuddin University (FMHU)
the selection processes are Seleksi Nasional Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri), SBMPTN (Seleksi Bersama
Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri), JNS (Jalur Non Subsidi) and International students. Looking at the various
selection methods in FMHU, this study aimed to see how each selection method related with students’
academic achievement.
Methods: This study compared academic achievement in two semesters at three academic admission students
(2014, 2015 and 2016), for four admission processes. The data consist of 308 students from batch of 2014, 308
students from batch of 2015, and 320 students from batch of 2016. The analysis was conducted in descriptive
analysis, One Way ANOVA, and followed by Post-hoc Bonferroni Test.
Results: There was significant difference of students GPA for each type of admission. The highest academic
achievement was obtained by students from International and SNMPTN admission while the lowest academic
achievement was obtained by students from SBMPTN and JNS.
Conclusion: Students from International and SNMPTN admission had the highest academic achievement
compared to SBMPTN and JNS. This study showed that there should be an evaluation of the assessment used
in SBMPTN and to continue the use of SNMPTN as one of the main admission route at FMHU.

 


Keywords


student selection, academic achievement, predictive validity

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Indonesia KK. Standar pendidikan profesi dokter. Jakarta: Konsil Kedokteran Indonesia. 2006. http://www.kki.go.id/assets/data/arsip/Final_SPPDI,_21_Maret_2013.pdf
  2. Biggs J, Kember D, Leung DY. The revised two‐factor study process questionnaire: R‐SPQ‐2F. British journal of educational psychology. 2001 Mar 1;71(1):133-49. http://www.johnbiggs.com.au/pdf/ex_2factor_spq.pdf
  3. Patterson F, Ferguson E, Knight AL. Selection into medical education and training. Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice. 2014:401-20.
  4. Mercer A, Puddey IB. Admission selection criteria as predictors of outcomes in an undergraduate medical course: A prospective study. Medical teacher. 2011 Dec 1;33(12):997-1004. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/0142159X.2011.577123
  5. Gardner SP, Roberts-Thomson KF. Predicting High Achievers in the University of Adelaide, Australia, Bachelor of Oral Health Program, 2002–09. Journal of dental education. 2012 Dec 1;76(12):1646-56. http://www.jdentaled.org/content/76/12/1646.full
  6. Lucieer SM, Stegers-Jager KM, Rikers RM, Themmen AP. Non-cognitive selected students do not outperform lottery-admitted students in the pre-clinical stage of medical school. Advances in health sciences education. 2016 Mar 1;21(1):51-61. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749643/
  7. Permatasari TO, Prabandari YS, Kristina TN. Tes Seleksi Mahasiswa Baru Sebagai Prediktor Terhadap Prestasi AkademikTes Seleksi Mahasiswa Baru Sebagai Prediktor Terhadap Prestasi Akademik. Tunas Medika Jurnal Kedokteran & Kesehatan. 2016 Jun 21;3(1).
  8. Ashaeryanto A, Kristina TN, Hadianto T. The Relationships of The types of Entry Selection of Students with their Learning Motivation, Learning Strategies, and Learning Achievement. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia; The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education.;6(1):1-0.
  9. Lynch CD, McConnell RJ, Hannigan A. Dental school admissions in Ireland: can current selection criteria predict success? European Journal of Dental Education. 2006 May 1;10(2):73-9. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2006.00398.x/abstract
  10. Tiffin PA, Mwandigha LM, Paton LW, Hesselgreaves H, McLachlan JC, Finn GM, Kasim AS. Predictive validity of the UKCAT for medical school undergraduate performance: a national prospective cohort study. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Sep 17;14(1):140. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5026770/
  11. Foley JI, Hijazi K. The admissions process in a graduate-entry dental school: can we predict academic performance? British dental journal. 2013 Jan 26;214(2): E4-. https://www.nature.com/articles/sj.bdj.2013.56
  12. Sladek RM, Bond MJ, Frost LK, Prior KN. Predicting success in medical school: a longitudinal study of common Australian student selection tools. BMC medical education. 2016 Jul 22;16(1):187. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-016-0692-3
  13. Goho J, Blackman A. The effectiveness of academic admission interviews: an exploratory meta-analysis. Med Teach, 2006;28(4), pp.335-340. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01421590600603418?src=recsys&journalCode=imte20



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.33403

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2380 | views : 2293

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Asty Amalia Nurhadi, Shelly Salmah, Muhammad Nasrum Massi, Firdaus Kasim

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by:

  

 JPKI Stats