* Corresponding Author
Evaluation of drought-tolerance in some tropical wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.) at different osmotic-stress levels
https://doi.org/10.22146/ipas.46435 Muhammad Kadir(1*), Kaimuddin Kaimuddin(2), Yunus Musa(3), Muh Farid Badaruddin(4), Amin Nur(5)
(1) Pangkep State Polytechnic of Agriculture Jl. Poros Makassar-Parepare Km.83 Mandalle, Pangkep, Sulawesi Selatan 90655, Indonesia
(2) Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture Hasanuddin University, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km. 10, Makassar 90245, Indonesia
(3) Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture Hasanuddin University, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km. 10, Makassar 90245, Indonesia
(4) Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture Hasanuddin University, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km. 10, Makassar 90245, Indonesia
(5) Indonesia Cereal Research Institute (ICeRI) Jl. Dr. Ratulangi No. 274, Maros, Sulawesi Selatan 90515, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Abiotic factors, such as temperature and drought, were the main factors limiting the cultivation under the tropical condition. Two-stage experiments were conducted to examine the drought-tolerant potential of some wheat genotypes against the osmotic stress under the tropical condition at the Laboratory and Greenhouse of Hasanuddin University and Indonesian Cereal Research Institute. The experiments were arranged in a randomized block design with the split-plot pattern and respectively provided with four and three replications. The main plot was potential osmotic stress (0, -0. 33 , and -0.67 MPa) and the sub-plot was selected wheat genotypes (17 genotypes). The results indicated that based on the germination percentage, shoot/root ratio, proline content, stomatal behavior, and relative water content, the wheat lines of O/HP-78-A22-3-7, WBLL*2KURUKU, O/HP-6-A8-2-10, and O/HP-22-A27-1-10 were identified to have better drought-tolerance than the others genotypes based on the analysis of responses to parameters observed. The positively adaptive response of some tropical wheat genotypes to drought stress may be used as a potential donor for further development of drought-tolerant wheat varieties under the tropical climate in Indonesia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdallah, E.F., A. Hashem, A.A. Alqarawi and H.A. Alwathnani. 2015. Alleviation of adverse impact of cadmium stress in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 47: 785-795.
Bates, L.S., R.P. Waldren and Teare. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39: 205-207.
Baloch, M.J., J. Dunwell, N.U. Khan, A.A. Khakwani, M. Dennett and W.A Jatoi. 2012. Profiling dehydrin gene sequence and physiological parameters in drought tolerant and susceptible spring wheat cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 44: 801–806.
Bandurska, H., J. Niedziela, M. Pietrowska-Borek, K. Nuc, T. Chadzinikolau and D. Radzikowska. 2017. Regulation of proline biosynthesis and resistance to drought stress in two barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes of different origin. Plant Phisiology and Biochemistry, 118: 427-437.
Chaturvedi, G.S., A. Singh and R. Bahadur. 2012. Screening techniques for evaluating crop germplasm for drought tolerance. Plant Archives, 12: 11-18.
Faghani, E., J. Gharechahi, K. Setsuko, M. Mehdi, K.R. Ali, N. Farzaneh, F.L. Karimi and S.G. Hosseini. 2014. Comparative physiology and proteomic analysis of two wheat genotypes contrasting in drought tolerance. Journal of Proteomics, 114: 1-15.
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center. 2014. Annual report turning research into impact. http://www.cimmyt.org/annual-reports.
International Seed Testing Association. 2008. International rules for seed testing CH-8303. http://www.seedtest.org/
Khakwani, A.A., M.D. Dennett and M. Abid. 2012. Growth and yield response of wheat varieties to Water Stress At Booting And Anthesis Stages Of Development. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 44: 879-886.
Liu, Y., H. Xu, X.X. Wen and Y.C. Liao. 2016. Effect of polyamine on seed germination of Wheat under drought stress is related to changes in hormones and carbohydrates. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15: 2759–2774.
Meher, P. Shivakrishna, R.K. Ashok and R.D. Manohar. 2018. Effect of PEG-6000 imposed drought stress on RNA content, Relative Water Content (RWC), and Chlorophyll content in peanut leaves and roots. Saudi Journal of Biological Science, 25: 285-289.
Mir, R.R., A.M. Zaman, N. Sreenivasulu, R. Trethowan and R.K. Varshney. 2012. Integrated genomics, physiology, and breeding approaches for improving drought tolerance in crops. Theory Applied Genetic, 125: 625-645.
Mwadzingeni, L., H. Shimelis, E. Dube, D.L. Mark and J.T. Toi. 2016. Breeding wheat for drought tolerance: Progress and technologies. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15: 935–943.
Nur, A., M. Azrai, H. Subagio, Soeranto, Ragapadmi, Sustiprajitno, and Trikoesoemaningtyas. 2014. Perkembangan pemuliaan gandum di Indonesia. Iptek Tanaman Pangan, 8: 97–105.
Ogaya, R., L. Llorens and J. Penuelas. 2011. Density and length of stomatal and epidermal cells in living fossil trees grown under elevated CO2 and a polar light regime. Acta Oecologica, 37: 381-385.
Rajendran, R.A., A.R. Muthiah, A. Manickam, P. Shanmugasundaram and A.J. Joel. 2011. Indices of drought tolerance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) genotypes at early stages of plant growth. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Science, 7: 42-46.
Rittgers, C., G. McDonald, S. Meylinah. 2019. Indonesia Grain and Feed Annual 2009 : https://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent GAIN Publications/Grain and Feed Annual_Jakarta_Indonesia_3-26-2019.pdf
Shukla, N., R.P. Awasthi, L. Rawat, and J. Kumar. 2015. Seed biopriming with drought-tolerant isolates of Trichoderma harzianum promote growth and drought-tolerance in Triticum aestivum L. Annals of Applied Biology, 166: 171–182.
Sikuku, P.A., M.P. Onyango and G.W. Netondo. 2012. Physiological and biochemical responses of five nerica rice varieties (Oryza sativa L.) to water deficit at vegetative and reproductive stage. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 3: 93–104.
Silva, E.C., M.B. Albuquerque, A.D.A. Neto, C.D.S. Junior. 2013. Drought and its consequences to plants form individual to ecosystem, p. 17-47. In: S.Akinci (Ed.). Response of Organisms to Water Stress. Croatia: Intech.
Swapna, S., K.S. Shylaraj. 2017. Screening for osmotic stress responses in rice varieties under drought condition. Rice Science, 24: 253-263.
Xu, Z.Z. and G.S. Zhou. 2008. Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass. Journal of Experimental Botany, 59:3317–3325.
Zegaoui, Z., S. Planchais, C. Cabassa, D. Reda, B.O. Abrous and C. Pierre. 2017. Variation in relative water content, proline accumulation and stress gene expression in two cowpea landraces under drought. Journal of Plant Physiology, 218: 26-34.
Zlatev, Z., F.C. Lidon. 2012. An overview on drought-induced changes in plant growth, water relations and photosynthesis. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 24: 57-72
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ipas.46435
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 1929
| 
views : 2203
Refbacks
Upcoming Issues :
-
Ilmu Pertanian (Agricultural Science) ISSN 0126-4214 (print), ISSN 2527-7162 (online) is published by Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada collaboration with Perhimpunan Sarjana Pertanian Indonesia (PISPI) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.