Development of Relocation Strategies Regarding Eruption Hazard in Mount Merapi

https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.24021

Rosdiana Puji Lestari(1*)

(1) Public Works and Housing, Energy and Mineral Resources Office of Yogyakarta Province, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The research was conducted to answer a questions: 1) how the relocation of the current strategy was carried out by the government 2) the problems that arise in the relocation which has yet to be resolved, 3) how the good concept of relocation so that these problems can be minimized. The research methodology used in this study combined quantitative and qualitative methods. Qualitative methods are used to explain the empirical facts that exist in each of these conditions in the relocation settlements. SWOT analysis is used to provide an overview of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in the relocation of victims of Merapi. Information, facts and issues that arise in the study will be described, explained and analyzed primarily for the impact of residential relocation on social and economic life of the community. Relocation concept of the economic aspects of community empowerment efforts should be made related to community economic recovery after a change in livelihood. In addition, the potential of community mapping needs to be done by the government to be optimized and developed. From the aspect of government settlements seek to transfer ownership of land in the new settlement which may be the property of the citizens so that citizens obtain legal certainty while occupying the new settlement. The social aspects of the development potential of relocating residents and making it as a tourist village, residents need to support that relocation is no longer a newcomer, they have the same rights and obligations with citizens of another.

Keywords


Merapi eruption; relocation; economy; social.

Full Text:

PDF


References

Arif, A., 2003. Alternatif Desain Hunian untuk Tepian Sungai [Design Alternative of Settlement in Riverside}. Kompas, 30 March, p. 15.

Budiharjo, E., 1994. Percikan Masalah Arsitektur, Perumahan, Perkotaan [Fragment of Architecture, Settlement, and Urban Problem]. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Farida, E., 2010. Konsep Relokasi Permukiman Bencana Alam Banjir (Studi Kasus Kabupaten Situbondo Jawa Timur) [Concept on Relocation of Settlement after Flood Hazard (Case Study on Situbondo Regency, East Java)].

Handrianto, 1996. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota [Journal of Urban and Spatial Development], Volume 22.

Mathur, M., 2011. Social Impact Assessment : A Tool for Planning Better Resettlement. Social Change Journal, 41(1), pp. 97-120.

Sulistioningrum, D., 2013. Using OSM,QGIS and INASAVE for Contigency Plan , Manila: Atheneo De Manila University.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.24021

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1923 | views : 1836

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s)


The content of this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ISSN 5249-5925 (online) | ISSN 2581-1037 (print)
Jl. Grafika No.2 Kampus UGM, Yogyakarta 55281
Email : jcef.ft@ugm.ac.id
Web Analytics JCEF Stats