* Corresponding Author
The Path of Military Power Interference in the Politics of Thailand
https://doi.org/10.22146/globalsouth.28822 Septyanto Galan Prakoso(1*)
(1) Program Studi Hubungan Internasional, Universitas Sebelas Maret
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Military element is undoubtedly important in order to protect a country's sovereignty. However, sometimes the functional aspect of military power can be biased, as military personnel also included in the political affairs. In some country this phenomenon happened, when military element through its personnel can become a part of government/bureaucratic mechanism. Tension is possible to rise between civil and military itself. In Thailand, military power can meddle in the country's politics through coup, even though it only runs the role to observe at first. The coup has happened for years in Thailand's modern history, noticeably started since 1932 after the revolution. Since then, military power always able to interfere Thailand’s political affairs and cause the fall and change of the government. Recently, the same things happened in May 7th, 2014 when Thai military launched a coup towards Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra's government, and ended her spell as prime minister since August 5th, 2011. Therefore, in order to deeply explore Thailand's military's activity in meddling inside the politics, this journal will try to trackback through Thailand's history and discover the reasons and factors which influenced military power's interference in Thailand politics.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bunbongkarn, S. (1993) Thailand in 1992: in search of a democratic order. Asian Survey 33( 2), A Survey of Asia in 1992: Part II, February.
CNN. (2014) Thai military takes over in coup -- again [Online], available from: < http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/22/world/asia/thailand-martial-law/> [Accessed 22 May 2014]
Diamond, L & Plattner, M.F., (1996) Civil-Military relations and democracy. Baltimore: JHU Press.
Huntington, S.P., (2003) The soldier and the state: the theory and politics civil-military relations; Bahasa Indonesia Edition, Prajurit dan negara: teori dan politik hubungan militer-sipil. Translator: Deasy Sinaga. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.
Maniruzzaman, T., (1978) Military withdrawal from politics: a comparative study. Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishing Company.
Nuechterlein, D.E., (1964) Thailand after sarit. Asian Survey, 4(5), May.
O’Donnell,G., (1976) Modernization and military coups: theory, comparisons and the argentine case. In Lowenthal, A.F, ed. Armies and politics in latin america. New York: Holmes & Meier.
Ockey, James., (2001) Thailand: The struggle to redefine civil-military relations. In Alagappa, M. ed. Coercion and governance: the declining political role of the military in asia. Stanford:Stanford University Press, pp.187-208.
Perlmutter, A. (1980) The comparative analysis of military regimes: formations, aspirations, and achievements. World Politics,33(1), October.
Phongpaichit, P. & Baker, C., (2002) Thailand: economy and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Riggs, F.W., (1967) Thailand: the modernization of a bureaucratic polity. Honolulu: East-West Center Press.
Samudavanija, C.& Bunbongkarn, S. (1986) Thailand. In Ahmad, Z.H. & Crouch, H. eds. Military-civilian relations in south-east asia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, pp 78-117.
Siffin, W.J., (1966) The Thai bureaucracy: institutional change and development. Honolulu: East-West Center Press.
Stephan, A., (1976) The new professionalism of international warfare and military role expansion. In Lowenthal, A.F. ed. Armies and politics in Latin America. New York: Holmes & Meier.
Stephan, A.ed. (1973) The new professionalism of internal warfare and military role expansion. Authoritarian Brazil: origins, policies, and future. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sukatipan, S., (1995) Thailand: the evolution of legitimacy. In Alagappa, M. ed. Political legitimacy in Southeast Asia: the quest for moral authority. California: Stanford University Press.
Tromp, H.W., (1971) The assessment of the military mind: a critical comment on methodology. In Van Gils, M.R. ed. The Perceived Role of the Military. Rotterdam University Press, n.p.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/globalsouth.28822
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 4316
| 
views : 2604
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.