Peta Riset Online Dating: Sebuah Analisis Bibliometrik
Abstract
Online dating merupakan proses relasi interpersonal yang dilakukan secara daring dengan individu yang dianggap potensial. Pergeseran individu dalam membentuk relasi dan memilih platform online dating telah memunculkan berbagai dinamika dan tantangan. Online dating semakin mengakomodasi preferensi seksual yang lebih eksplisit sehingga menghadapi tantangan seperti meningkatnya objektifikasi dan penilaian berdasarkan penampilan fisik semata. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tren dan perkembangan "online dating" menggunakan pendekatan bibliometrik. Dari database Scopus sebanyak 753 artikel diperoleh sejak tahun 1970 hingga sekarang. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan peta riset online dating meliputi peneliti paling berpengaruh, afiliasi dan negara paling produktif, tren topik penelitian, perkembangan penelitian waktu ke waktu, artikel yang sering disitasi, dan analisis tema tematik mengenai online dating. Temuan analisis bibliometrik ini berharga bagi peneliti selanjutnya sebagai gambaran umum dan informasi awal untuk mengembangkan topik penelitian mengenai online dating.
Keywords
DOI: 10.22146/buletinpsikologi.97541
References
Abramova, O., Baumann, A., Krasnova, H., & Buxmann, P. (2016). Gender diferences in online dating: What do we know so far? A systematic literature review. In 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 3858–3867, IEEE.
Ahmi, A. (2023). OpenRefine: An approachable tool for cleaning and harmonizing bibliographical data. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 2827 (1). AIP Publishing
Aldana, A. A., & Salazar, L. (2024). Racial preferences in dating apps: an experimental approach. The History of the Family, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2024.2352547
APJII. (2024, Februari). Jumlah Pengguna Internet Indonesia Tembus 221 Juta Orang. https://apjii.or.id/berita/d/apjii-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-221-juta-orangtanggal 20 Juni 2024.
Appio, F. P., Cesaroni, F., & Di Minin, A. (2014). Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: A document co-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 101(1), 623–661.
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Avila-Robinson, A., & Wakabayashi, N. (2018). Changes in the structures and directions of destination management and marketing research: A bibliometric mapping study, 2005–2016. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 10, 101-111.
Blackwell, C., Birnholtz, J., & Abbott, C. (2015). Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1117-1136.https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814521595
Blackhart, G. C., Fitzpatrick, J., & Williamson, J. (2014). Dispositional factors predicting use of online dating sites and behaviors related to online dating. Computers in human behavior, 33, 113-118.
Bonilla-Zorita, G., Griffiths, M. D., & Kuss, D. J. (2021). Online dating and problematic use: A systematic review. International journal of mental health and addiction, 19, 2245-2278.
Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual review of information science and technology, 36(1), 1-53.
Bruch, E. E., & Newman, M. E. (2018). Aspirational pursuit of mates in online dating markets. Science Advances, 4(8), eaap9815.
Byrne, D., Ervin, C. R., & Lamberth, J. (1970). Continuity between the experimental study of attraction and real-life computer dating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(1), 157–165.https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029836
Cabañes, J. V. A., & Uy-Tioco, C. S. (2020). Mobilemedia and the rise of ‘glocal intimiacies’ in Asia. In J. V. A. Cabañes & C. S. Uy-Tioco (Eds.), Mobile media and social intimacies in Asia, 1–12. Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1790-6_1
Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Gonzaga, G. C., Ogburn, E. L., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2013). Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(25), 10135-10140.
Cobo, M. J., Lõpez-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2012). SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1609–1630. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22688
Costa-Feito, A., González-Fernández, A. M., Rodríguez-Santos, C., & Cervantes-Blanco, M. (2023). Electroencephalography in consumer behaviour and marketing: a science mapping approach. In Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01991-6
Curry, D. (2024, Agustus). Dating app report 2024. Business of Apps. https://www.businessofapps.com/data/dating-app-report/?utm_source=dating&utm_ medium=click&utm_campaign=featured-ad. tanggal 11 Agustus 2024
Duguay, S., Dietzel, C., & Myles, D. (2024). The year of the “virtual date”: Reimagining dating app affordances during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Online Dating Research, 22(1), 45-67.
Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research,133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 415-441.
Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 855–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12078
Filice, E., Abeywickrama, K. D., Parry, D. C., & Johnson, C. W. (2022). Sexual violence and abuse in online dating: A scoping review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 67, 1–18.
Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online Dating: A Critical Analysis From the Perspective of Psychological Science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436522
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-Presentation in Online Personals: The Role of Anticipated Future Interaction, Self-Disclosure, and Perceived Success in Internet Dating. Communication Research, 33(2), 152-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205285368
Himawan, K.K., Underwood, M., Bambling, M., Edirippulige, S. (2022). Being single when marriage is the norm: Internet use and the well-being of never-married adults in Indonesia. Curr Psychol41, 8850–8861.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01367-6
Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self‐disclosure in computer‐mediated communication: The role of self‐awareness and visual anonymity. European journal of social psychology, 31(2), 177-192.
Kang, T., & Hoffman, L. H. (2011). Why would you decide to use an online dating site? Factors that lead to online dating. Communication Research Reports, 28(3), 205-213.
Kennedy, R. (2003). Interracial intimacies: Sex, marriage, identity, and adoption. Pantheon Books.
Kornrich, S., & Robbins, B. (2024). The rise of online dating and racial homogamy in marriage. Social Science Research, 119, 102976.
LeFebvre, L. E. (2018). Swiping me off my feet: Explicating relationship initiation on Tinder. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(9), 1205-1229.
Liu, Z. (2022). Mapping the research trends of third language acquisition: A bibliometric analysis based on Scopus. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–25.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1021517
March, E., Grieve, R., Marrington, J., & Jonason, P. K. (2017). Trolling on Tinder® (and other dating apps): Examining the role of the Dark Tetrad and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 139–143.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.025
McWilliams, S. A., & Barrett, A. E. (2014). Online dating in middle and later life: Gendered expectations and experiences. Journal of Family Issues, 35(3), 411-436.
Potarca, G. (2017). Does the internet affect assortative mating? Evidence from the US and Germany. Social science research, 61, 278-297.
Potarca, G. (2021). Online dating is shifting educational inequalities in marriage formation in Germany. Demography, 58(5), 1977-2007.
Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 523-547.
Rosenfeld, M. J., Thomas, R. J., & Hausen, S. (2019). Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the United States displaces other ways of meeting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(36), 17753-17758.
Sharabi, L. L., & Caughlin, J. P. (2017). What predicts first date success? A longitudinal study of modality switching in online dating. Personal Relationships, 24(2), 370–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12188
Skopek, J., Schmitz, A., & Blossfeld, H. P. (2011). The gendered dynamics of age preferences-Empirical evidence from online dating. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 23(3), 267-290.
Smith, A., & Duggan, M. (2013). Online dating & relationships. Pew Research Center.
Sprecher, S. (2009). Relationship initiation and formation on the Internet. Marriage & Family Review, 45, 761–782.https://doi.org/10.1080/01494920903224350
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 7, 321–326.
Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L., & Ligtenberg, L. (2017). Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application Tinder. Telematics and informatics, 34(1), 67-78.
Thomas, R. J. (2020). Online exogamy reconsidered: Estimating the Internet’s effects on racial, educational, religious, political and age assortative mating. Social Forces, 98(3), 1257-1286.
Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017). To Tinder or not to Tinder, that's the question: An individual differences perspective to Tinder use and motives. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 74-79.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.026.
Toma, C. L. (2015). Online dating. The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication, 1-5.
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1169-1182.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.
Visser, M., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of science, dimensions, crossref, and Microsoft academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112
We Are Social, & Hootsuite. (2023, Februari). Digital 2023: Indonesia. Retrieved fromhttps://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-indonesia. tanggal 20 Juni 2024.
Whitty, M. T., & Carr, A. N. (2006). Cyberspace romance: The psychology of online relationships. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Whitty, M. T. (2008). Liberating or debilitating? An examination of romantic relationships, sexual relationships and friendships on the Net. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1837-1850.
Wu, Y., Chen, J., Fang, H., & Wan, Y. (2020). Intimate partner violence: A bibliometric review of literature. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155607
Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1816–1836.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012
Zweig, J. M., Dank, M., Lachman, P., & Yahner, J. (2013). Technology, teen dating violence and abuse, and bullying. Urban Institute.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Buletin Psikologi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
* Corresponding Author
