Otoritarianisme dan Dukungan terhadap Demokrasi: Kajian Meta Analisis

Victorius Didik Suryo Hartoko

doi:10.22146/buletinpsikologi.22771

Otoritarianisme dan Dukungan terhadap Demokrasi: Kajian Meta Analisis

Victorius Didik Suryo Hartoko

(Submitted 6 March 2017)

(Published 1 December 2016)

Abstract

Authoritarians tend to have submissive attitude toward authority, conservative, and ready to punish groups that have different moral attitudes.These characteristics are not conducive for development of democratic society. This meta-analytical study tries to test relation between authoritarianism and support for democratic values. From 60 articles with 117 studies and 74432 total participants, we found that authoritarianism have negative significant correlation with support for democratic values (Mean effect size=-.3892; p< 0.05). Authoritarianism correlates negatively with support for civic liberty and human rights. Authoritarianism also correlates positively with support for blind nationalism, military interventions,prejudice and discrimination toward groups from different races, immigrants and homosexuals. Authoritarianism can be hindrance for democratization processes.

Keywords

authoritarianism; democracy; civil liberty

Full Text: Uncorrected Proof PDF

DOI: 10.22146/buletinpsikologi.22771

References

*Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J., and Sanford, R. N. (1950). Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper & Row

Altemeyer, B. (2006). The Authoritarian. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Mannitoba.

*Altemeyer, B. (1998). The Other “Authoritarian Personality”. Dalam M. P. Zanna (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol.30, pp 47-92. San Diego: Academy Press.

*Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2 (2), 113-133

Aron, R. (1993) Kebebasan dan Martabat Manusia. Judul asli: Essai sur les libertes. Penerjemah: Hidayat, R.S., Harapan, A.A., Eddin, E.H., & Hartoyo, K. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

*Asbrock, F., Sibley, C.G., And Duckitt, J. (2010). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: a longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality. 24: 324–340. Published online 24 November 2009 in Wiley InterScience. (www.interscience.wiley. com). http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/per.746

*Bäckström, M., &Björklund, F. (2007). Structural modeling of generalized prejudice: The role of social dominance, authoritarianism, and empathy. Journal of Individual Differences, 28(1), 10-17 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.10

*Bonanno, G. A., and Jost, J. T. (2006). Conservative Shift Among High-Exposure Survivors of the September 11th Terrorist Attacks. Basic And Applied Social Psychology, 28(4), 311–323; http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2804_4

*Brandt, M. J., & Reyna, C. (2014). To Love or Hate Thy Neighbor: The Role of Authoritarianism and Traditionalism in Explaining the Link Between Fundamentalism and Racial Prejudice. Political Psychology, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pops.12077

*Butler, J.C. (2000). Personality and emotional correlates of right-wing authoritarianism. Social Behavior and Personality, 2000, 28(1), 1-14. http:// dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2000.28.1.1

*Canetti-Nisim, D. (2004) The effect of religiosity on endorsement of democratic values: the mediating influence of authoritarianism. Political Behavior, 26, (4): 377-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11109-004-0901-3

*Cantal, C., Milfont, T.L., Wilson, M.S., and Gouveia, V.V. (2015). Differential Effects of Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on Dimensions of Generalized Prejudice in Brazil. European Journal of Personality, Eur. J. Pers. 29: 17–27 (2015). Published online 31 October 2014 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). http:// dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.1978

*Charles-Toussaint, G., & Crowson, H. (2010). Prejudice against international students: The role of threat perceptions and authoritarian disposition in US students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144 (5), 413-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2010.496643

Chirumbolo, A., and Leone, L. (2008). Individual differences in need for closure and voting behavior. Personality and Individual Differences 44 (2008) 1279–1288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.paid.2007.11.012

*Cohrs, J.C., & Ibler, S. (2009). Authoritarianism, Threat, and Prejudice: An Analysis of Mediation and Moderation. Basic And Applied Social Psychology, 31:81–94, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01973530802659638

*Cohrs, J.C., Kielmann, S., Maes, J., & Moschner, B. (2005). Effects of right-wing authoritarianism and threat from terrorism on restriction of civil liberties. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2005

*Collani, G.V., & Grumm, M. (2009) On the Dimensional Structure of Personality, Ideological Beliefs, Social Attitudes, and Personal Values Journal of Individual Differences 2009; Vol. 30(2). http:// dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.30.2.xxx

*Cornelis. I., and Van Hiel, A. (2006). The Impact of Cognitive Styles on Authoritarianism Based Conservatism and Racism. Basic And Applied Social Psychology, 28(1), 37–50.

*Crawford, J. T., & Pilanski, J. M. (2014). The Differential Effects of Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on Political Intolerance. Political Psychology, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pops.12066

*Crowson, M.H., (2009)b. Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation as Mediators of Worldview Beliefs on Attitudes Related to the War on Terror. Social Psychology 2009; Vol. 40(2):93–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/ 1864-9335.40.2.93

*Crowson, M.H., Brandes, J.A., & Hurst, R.J. (2013) Who opposes rights for persons with physical and intellectual disabilities? Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2013, 43, pp. E307–E318

*Crowson, H., & Debacker, T. (2008). Belief, motivational and ideological correlates of human right attitudes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148 (3), 293-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.148.3.293-310

*Crowson, H., Debacker, T., & Thoma, S. (2006). The role of Authoritarianism, perceived threat and need for closure or structure in predicting post 9/11 attitudes and beliefs. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146 (6), 733-750.

*Crowson, M.H., & Gries, P.H. (2010). Do right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict anti-china attitudes? Psicología Política, Nº 40, 2010, 7-29

Dahl, R. A. (1989/1992). Demokrasi dan Para Pengritiknya. Diterjemahkan dari Democacy and Its Critics, Penterj: A. Rahman Zainuddin. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Dahl, R. A. (1999/2001). Perihal Demokrasi, Menjelajahi Teori dan Praktek Demokrasi secara Singkat. Diterjemahkan dari On Democracy, oleh: A. Rahman Zainuddin. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia

*Danso, H., Hunsberger, B., and Pratt, M. (1997). The Role of Parental Religious Fundamentalism and Right-Wing Authoritarianism in Child-Rearing Goals and Practices. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 36, No. 4 (Dec., 1997), pp. 496-511. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1387686

*De Zavala, A.G., & Van Bergh, A. (2007). Need for Cognitive Closure and Conservative Political Beliefs: Differential Mediation by Personal Worldviews. Political Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 5, 2007. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/ stable/20447071 (Tidak ditemukan di naskah)

*Dhont, K., & Van Hiel, A. (2009). We must not be enemies: Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice among authoritarians. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 172-177.http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.022

*Diaz-Lazaro, C., Casteneiras, C., Ledesma, R., Verdinelli, S., & Rand, A. (2014). Right Wing Authoritarianism, social dominance orienation, empathy and materialistic value orientation ad predictors of intergroup prejudice in Argentina. Salud & Sociedad, 5 (3): 282-297

*Duckitt, J. (1993). Right wing authoritarianism among white South African students: Its measurement and correlates. The Journal of Social psychology, 133(4), 553-563

*Duckitt, J. (2001). A Dual Process Cognitive-Motivational Theory of Ideology and Prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol.33, pp 41-113. SanDiego: Academy Press.

Duckitt, J. (2009). Authoritarianism and Dogmatism. In M. Leary & R. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior (pp. 298-317). New York: Guilford Press.

*Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S.W. and Heled, E. (2010). A Tripartite Approach to Right-Wing Authoritarianism: The Authoritarianism-Conservatism-Traditionalism Model. Political Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 5, 2010. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00781.x

*Duckitt, J. & Sibley, C. (2007). Right Wing Authoritarianism, Social Dominance Orientation and The Dimensions of Generalized Prejudice. European Journal of Personality. 21: 113–130 (2007). Published online 24 November 2006 in Wiley InterScience. (www.interscience.wiley.com) http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.614

*Duckitt, J. & Sibley, C. (2010). Personality, Ideology, Prejudice, and Politics: A Dual-Process Motivational Model. Journal of Personality 78(6): 1826-1893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x

*Duriez, B. (2011a). Adolescent ethnic prejudice: Understanding the effect of parental extrinsic versus inrinsic goal promotion. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151 (4), 441-454. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2010.490571

*Duriez, B., & Soenens, B. (2006). Personality, Identity Styles and Authoritarianism: An Integrative Study among Late Adolescents. European Journal of Personality. 20: 397–417 (2006). Published online 19 May 2006 in Wiley InterScience. (www.interscience.wiley. com). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.589

*Duriez, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32: 1199-1213

*Duriez, B., Van Hiel, A., and Kossowska, M. (2005). Authoritarianism and Social Dominance in Western and Eastern Europe: The Importance of the Sociopolitical Context and of Political Interest and Involvement. Political Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 2, Special Issue: Authoritarianism (Apr., 2005), pp.299-320. Stable URL: http://www.jstor. org/stable/3792616

*Ekkehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M., Zakrisson, I. (2004). What Matters Most to Prejudice: Big Five Personality, Social Dominance Orientation, or Right-Wing Authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality. Eur. J. Pers. 18: 463–482 (2004). Published online 25 May 2004 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience. wiley.com). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ per.526

Faturochman (1993). Prejudice and hostility: Some Perspectives. Buletin Psikologi, 1,17-33

Federico, C.M., Hunt, C.V., & Ergun, D. (2009). Political Expertise, Social Worldviews, and Ideology: Translating ‘‘Competitive Jungles’’ and ‘‘Dangerous Worlds’’ into Ideological Reality. Soc Just Res (2009) 22:259–279. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11211-009-0097-0

Feldman, S. (2003). Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism. Political Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 1 (Mar., 2003), pp. 41-74, Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3792510

Fromm, E. (1960/1942). Fear of Freedom. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul LTD

Giddens, A.(1999/ 1998). Jalan Ketiga Pembaruan Demokrasi Sosial,. Judul asli: The Third Way The Renewal of Social Democracy. Penterjemah: Ketut Arya Mahardika. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

*Hetherington, M. J., and Suhay, E. (2011). Authoritarianism, Threat, and Americans' Support for the War on Terror. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 546-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j. 1540-5907.2011.00514.x

*Hodson, G., & Busseri, M. (2012) Bright minds and dark attitudes: Lower cognitive ability predict greater prejudice through right wing ideology and low intergroup contact. Psychological Sciences, 23 (2) 187-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611421206

*Hodson, G., and Costello, K. (2007). Interpersonal Disgust, Ideological Orientations, and Dehumanization as Predictors of Intergroup Attitudes. PsychologicalScience. 18 (8): 691 -698

Hook, S. (1994). Sidney Hook: Sosok Filsuf Humanis Demokrat dalam Tradisi Pragmatisme, sebuah Bunga Rampai. Editor dan pendahuluan: Paul Kurtz, kata pengantar edisi Indonesia: Y.B. mangunwijaya. Penerjemah: Ignatius Gatur dan Avi Mahaningtyas. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Hing, L.S., Bobocel, D., Zanna, M., & McBride, M. (2007). Authoritarian Dynamics and Unethical Decision Making: High Social Dominance Orientation Leaders and High Right-Wing Authoritarianism Followers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 92, No. 1, 67–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.67

Huntington, S. (1991/ 1995). Gelombang Demokratisasi Ketiga, Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti

Inglehart, R, & Welzel, C. (2010).Changing Mass Priorities: The Link between Modernization and Democracy. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 8/No. 2: 551-567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710001258

*Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (Un-)Truth to Power: Conspiracy Mentality as a Generalised Political Attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28: 25–43 (2014). Published online 11 July 2013 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.1930

*Janoff-Bulman, R., Sheikh, S., & Baldacci, K. (2008). Mapping moral motives: Approach, Avoidance, and political orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44 (4), 1091-1099. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.11.003

Ji, C., & Ibrahim, Y. (2007). Islamic Religiosity in Right-Wing Authoritarian personality: The Case of Indonesian Muslims. Review of Religious Research. Vol. 49 (2): 128-146

*Johnson, M.K., Rowatt, W.C., Bernard-Bark, L.M.., Patock-Peckham, J.A., Labouf, J.P., & Carlisle, R.D. (2011). A mediational analysis of the role of right-wing authoritarianism and religious fundamentalism in the religiosity–prejudice link. Personality and Individual Differences 50 (2011) 851–856. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.010

*Johnson, M.K., Rowatt, W.C., Carlisle, R.D., Labouf, J.P., & Patock-Peckham, J.A. (2012). Facets of Right-Wing Authoritarianism Mediate the Relationship Between Religious Fundamentalism and Attitudes Toward Arabs and African Americans. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (2012) 51(1):128–142

Jost, H.T., Federico, C. M., and Napier, J.L. (2009) Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities. Annual Review of Psychology. 60:307–37. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600

Jost, J.T., Glaser, J., Kruglansky, A.W., and Sulloway, F.J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 129 (3): 339-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037.0033-2909.129.3.339

Jost,J. T., Nosek, B. A., and Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology Its Resurgence in Social, Personality, and Political Psychology. Perspective of Psychological Science. Vol. 3 (2): 126 – 136.

*Jugert, P., and Duckitt, J. (2009). A Motivational Model of Authoritarianism: Integrating Personal and Situational Determinants. Political Psychology, Vol. 30. No. 5: 693-719. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00722.x

*Koleva, S.P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality. 46 (2012) 184–194. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006

*Kugler, M., Jost, J.T., Noorbaloochi, S. (2014). Another Look at Moral Foundations Theory: Do Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Explain Liberal-Conservative Differences in ‘‘Moral’’ Intuitions? Soc Just Res. Published on line 16 November 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0223-5

*Laythe, B., Finkel, D., and Kirkpatrick, L.A. (2001). Predicting Prejudice from Religious Fundamentalism and Right-Wing Authoritarianism: A Multiple-Regression Approach. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 40, No. 1 (Mar., 2001), pp. 1-10. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1388176

*Leone, L., Desimoni, M., & Chirumbolo, A. (2014). Interest and Expertise Moderate the Relationship between Right-Wing Attitudes, Ideological Self-Placement and Voting. European Journal of Personality, 28: 2–13 (2014). Published online 26 September 2012 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.1880

*Lewis, G.J., & Bates, T.C. (2011). From left to right: How the personality system allows basic traits to influence politics via characteristic moral adaptations. British Journal of Psychology. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02016.x

*Malka, A., Soto, C.J., Inzlicht, M., and Lelkes, Y. (2014). Do Needs for Security and Certainty Predict Cultural and Economic Conservatism? A Cross-National Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 106, No. 6, 1031–1051. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ a0036170

*McFarland, S. (2010). Authoritarianism, Social Dominance, and Other Roots of Generalized Prejudice. PoliticalPsychology, Vol. 31, No. 3 (June 2010), pp. 453-477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j. 1467-9221.2010.00765.

*Miklikowska, M. (2012). Psychological underpinnings of democracy: Empathy, authoritarianism, self-esteem, interpersonal trust, normative identity style, and openness to experience as predictors of support for democratic values. Personality and Individual Differences 53 (2012) 603–608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.032

*Milojev, P., Osborne, D., Greaves, L.M., Bulbulia , J., Wilson, M.S., Davies, C.L., Liu, J. H., &Sibley, C.G. (2014). Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Predict Different Moral Signatures. Soc Just Res (2014) 27:149–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0213-7

*Nicol, A. A.,& Rounding, K. (2013). Alienation and empathy as mediators of the relation between Social Dominance Orientation, Right-Wing Authoritarianism and expressions of racism and sexism. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 294-299. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.009

*Oesterreich, D. (2005). Flight into security: a new approach and measure of the authoritarian personality. Political Psychology 26(2): 275-97.

*Onraet, E. Van Hiel, A.,Roets, A., Cornelis, I. (2011).The Closed Mind: ‘Experience’ and ‘Cognition’ Aspects of Openness to Experience and Need for Closure as Psychological Bases for Right-wing Attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 25: 184–197 (2011). Published online 22 July 2010 (wileyonlinelibrary.com) http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.775

*Oosterhoff, B., Ferris, K.A., and Metzger, A. (2014). Adolescents’ Sociopolitical Values in the Context of Organized Activity Involvement. Youth & Society, 1– 21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0044118X14560528

*Oyamot, C.M., Borgida, J.E., Fisher, E.L. (2006). Can Values Moderate the Attitudes of Right-Wing Authoritarians? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Vol. 32 No. 4, April 2006 486-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0146167205278308

*Passini, S. (2008). Exploring the multidimensional facets of authoritarianism: authoritarian aggression and social dominance orientation. Swis Journal of Psychology, 67 (1), 51-60. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1024/1421-018567.1.51

*Passini, S., & Morselli, D. (2010). The Obedience–disobedience Dynamic and the Role of Responsibility. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 20: 1–14. Published online 11 February 2009 in Wiley InterScience. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1002/casp.1000

*Pedersen, A., Beven, J.P. , Walker, I. and Griffiths, B. (2004). Attitudes toward Indigenous Australians:The role of empathy and guilt, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14 (4). pp. 233-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ casp.771

*Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M., , and Malle, B.F. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation: A Personality Variable Predicting Social and Political Attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 67, No. 4, 741-763

*Rattazzi, A., Bobbio, A., & Canova, L. (2007). A short version of the right wing authoritarianism (RWA) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1223-1234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.paid.2007.03.013

*Roetz, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2006). Need for closure relations with authoritarianism, conservative beliefs and racism: the impact of urgency and permanence tendencies. Psychology Belgica, 46-3: 235-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pb-46-3-235

Roets, A., Van Hiel, A., & Cornelis, I. (2006). Does materialism predict racism? Materialism as a distinctive social attitude and a predictor of prejudice. European Journal of Personality. 20: 155–168. Published online 2 March 2006 in Wiley InterScience. (www.interscience. wiley.com). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ per.573

*Rowatt, W.C., & Franklin, L.M. (2004). Christian Orthodoxy, Religious Fundamentalism, and Right-Wing Authoritarianism as Predictors of Implicit Racial Prejudice. The International Journal For The Psychology Of Religion, 14(2), 125–138

*Schoon , I., Cheng, H., Gale, C.R., Batty, G.D., and Deary, I.J. (2010) Social status, cognitive ability, and educational attainment as predictors of liberal social attitudes and political trust. Intelligence 38 (1) 144–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.09.005

Setiawan, B. (2012). Sosok Kelas Menengah, Makin Konsumtif makin konservatif. Kompas, Jumat 8 Juni 2012, hal 33.

Stenner, K. (2005). The Authoritarian Dynamic. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Stenner, K. (2009). Three Kinds of “Conservatism”. PsychologicalInquiry, 20: 142-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 10478400903028615

*Van Hiel, A., Cornelis, I., & Roets, A.De Clercq, B.(2007). A Comparison of Various Authoritarianism Scales in Belgian Flanders. European Journal of Personality. 21: 149–168 (2007). Published online 3 January 2007 in Wiley InterScience. (www.interscience.wiley. com) http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.617

*Van Hiel, A., Pandelaere, M., & Duriez, B. (2004). The Impact of Need for Closure on Conservative Beliefs and Racism: Differential Mediation by Author

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.