Habermas’ Concept of “Lebenswelt” and System and Its Implication for the Position of Religion in Public Life

https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.82237

Sunaryo Sunaryo(1*)

(1) Universitas Paramadina, Jakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The concept of “Lebenswelt” (the lifeworld) and the system are essential in Jürgen Habermas's thought. Habermas understands Lebenswelt as background knowledge that people take for granted naively. It becomes the horizon of their daily communication. He emphasizes the importance of coupling Lebenswelt and system. The uncoupling will make society get loss of meaning. Then we ask how he understands the position of religion in public life. How should we place religion as a part of Lebenswelt in making public law? To answer the question, we did the library research by exploring Habermas's works and his commentators. Then I conclude that Habermas offers accommodative participation to religion in public life through discourse. In the discourse, views inspired by religion can be put forward in the public sphere as far as they undergo a rationalization process. They should be openly discussed and tested instead of being taken for granted naively. Views inspired by religion will be accepted as long as they are rational. Discourse practice requires religious groups to be more mature and rational in formulating their ideas in the public sphere. Religious ideas are no longer positioned as closed and anti-criticism.

Keywords


Lebenswelt, System, Communicative Action, Religion,Public Life, Discourse

Full Text:

PDF


References

Bahram, M. (2013). Habermas, Religion, and Public Life. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/13537903.2013.831638, 28(3), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2013.831638

Berger, J. (1991). The Linguistification of the Sacred and the Delinguistification of the Economy. In A. Honneth & H. Joas (Eds.), Communicative Action. The MIT Press.

Boettcher, J. W. (2009). Habermas, religion and the ethics of citizenship. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1177/0191453708098761, 35(1–2), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453708098761

Dostert, T. (2006). Beyond Political Liberalism: Toward a Post-Secular Ethics of Public Life. University of Notre Dame Press.

Farrelly, C. (2004). Introduction to Contemporary Political Theory. SAGE Publications.

Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2, Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the Public Sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-0378.2006.00241.X

Habermas, J. (2010). Basis Prapolitis sebuah Negara Hukum yang Demokratis. In P. B. Kleden & A. Sunarko (Eds.), Dialektika Sekularisasi: Diskusi Habermas - Ratzinger dan Tanggapan. Penerbit LAMALERA.

Hardiman, F. B. (1993). Menuju Masyarakat Komunikatif. Kanisius.

Hardiman, F. B. (2009). Demokrasi Deliberatif. Kanisius.

Lafont, C. (2009). Religion and the public sphere. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1177/0191453708098758, 35(1–2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453708098758

Magnis-Suseno, F. (2000). 12 Tokoh Etik Abad ke-20. Kanisius.

Owen, D. (2002). Between Reason and History: Habermas and the Idea of Progress. State University of New York Press.

Rawls, J. (1996). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.

Rawls, J. (2000). The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. In The Law of Peoples with “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” Harvard University Press.

Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (E. Kelly (ed.)). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Sen, A. (2002). Open and Closed Impartiality. The Journal of Philosophy, 99(9), 445–469.

Sen, A. (2009). The Idea of Justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Sunarko, A. (2010). Dialog Teologis dengan Jürgen Habermas. In P. B. Kleden & A. Sunarko (Eds.), Dialektika Sekularisasi: Diskusi Habermas - Ratzinger dan Tanggapan. Penerbit LAMALERA.

Sunaryo. (2021). Perihal Keadilan: Keutamaan dan Dasar Hidup Bersama. Kompas.

Taylor, C. (1999). The Politics of Recognition. In B. A. Brody & G. Sher (Eds.), Social and Political Philosophy: Contemporary Readings. Harcourt Brace College Publisher.

Turner, B. S. (1991). Religion and Social Theory. The Sage Publication.

Yates, M. (2007). Rawls and Habermas on religion in the public sphere. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 33(7), 880–891. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453707081685




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.82237

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1233 | views : 1854

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Filsafat

Jurnal Filsafat Indexed by:

Google ScholarSinta (Science and Technology Index)


Jurnal Filsafat ISSN 0853-1870 (print), ISSN 2528-6811 (online)