Issue

Vol 39 No 3 (2024): September

Date Log

Submitted
Oct 2, 2023
Accepted
Feb 29, 2024
Published
Sep 10, 2024
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright

Upon acceptance of an article, authors transfer copyright to the JIEB as part of a journal publishing agreement, but authors still have the right to share their article for personal use, internal institutional use, and for any use permitted under the CC BY-SA license

Open Access

Articles are freely available to the public without any subscription with permitted reuse. For open access articles, permitted third party (re)use is defined by the following Creative Commons user licenses: Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-SA).

Rural Government Cooperation Intensity and Leadership in Fostering the Innovation Capabilities of Rural Microbusinesses

https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.v39i3.10068
Ardy Wibowo
Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, 50139, Indonesia
Defia Ifsantin Maula
defia@almaata.ac.id
Department of Management, Faculty of Economic and Business, Alma Ata University, 55184, Indonesia
Dani Fikri Setiawan
Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economic and Business, Alma Ata University, 55184, Indonesia
Muhammad Hisam
Department of Management, Faculty of Economic and Business, Alma Ata University, 55184, Indonesia

Corresponding Author(s) : Defia Ifsantin Maula

defia@almaata.ac.id

Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, Vol 39 No 3 (2024): September

Abstract

Introduction: The growth of rural entrepreneurship significantly impacts economic growth and the well-being of rural communities. Background Problem: Innovation is crucial for entrepreneurs' success, with rural government playing a pivotal role in rural societies. Novelty: This study overviews the role of rural government in fostering entrepreneurial innovation, focusing on inter-organizational collaboration and the village head's leadership style. Research Method: Employing a quantitative survey methodology, the study undertook direct surveys of 300 rural micro- and small-scale entrepreneurs from diverse industries in Indonesia. A simple random sampling technique was used to ensure a representative sample of the population. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling—Partial Least Squares. Findings: The analysis reveals that rural government cooperation and transformative leadership positively influence entrepreneurs' perceptions of organiza­tional support. In turn, perceived organizational support significantly impacts the desire for knowledge sharing and innovation capability enhancement. This study diverges from previous research by examining the mediating roles of knowledge sharing and perceived organizational support in innovation capability enhancement. It confirms that perceived organizational support is a vital mediator in the relationship between government cooperation intensity, transformational leadership, and innovation capability. Conclusions: The findings underscore the need for rural governments to practice effective cooperation and leadership and provide consistent support. Such strategies facilitate a supportive environ­ment that fosters knowledge sharing and significantly boosts rural entrepreneurs' innovation capabilities.

Keywords

government cooperation intensity transformational leadership perceived organizational support knowledge sharing innovation capability rural entrepreneurship
Wibowo, A., Maula, D. I., Setiawan, D. F., & Hisam, M. (2024). Rural Government Cooperation Intensity and Leadership in Fostering the Innovation Capabilities of Rural Microbusinesses. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 39(3), 282 -. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.v39i3.10068
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Akgunduz, Y., Alkan, C., & Gök, Ö. A. (2018). Perceived organizational support, employee creativity and proactive personality: The mediating effect of meaning of work. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 34, 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHTM.2018.01.004.
  2. Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., & Hussain, S. T. (2020). The impact of organizational justice on employee innovative work behavior: Mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Innovation & Know-ledge, 5(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JIK.2019.10.001
  3. Al Amiri, N., Abdul Rahim, R. E., & Ahmed, G. (2020). Leadership Styles and Organizational Knowledge Management Activities: A Systematic Review. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 22(3), 250. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.49903
  4. Allameh, S. M. (2018). Antecedents and consequences of intellectual capital: The role of social capital, knowledge sharing and innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(5), 858–874. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-05-2017-0068/FULL/XML
  5. Alpkan, L., Bulut, C., Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., & Kilic, K. (2010). Organizational support for intrapreneurship and its interaction with human capital to enhance innovative performance. Management Decision, 48(5), 732–755. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011043902/FULL/XML
  6. Amankwaa, A., Susomrith, P., & Seet, P.-S. (2022). Innovative behavior among service workers and the importance of leadership: evidence from an emerging economy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(2), 506–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09853-6
  7. Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organi¬zational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203
  8. Becker, J. M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 359–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LRP.2012.10.001
  9. Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in Social Exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1964.tb00583.x
  10. Blau, P. M. (2017). Exchange and power in social life. Exchange and Power in Social Life, 1–352. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203792643/EXCHANGE-POWER-SOCIAL-LIFE-PETER-BLAU
  11. Castaneda, D. I., & Cuellar, S. (2020). Knowledge sharing and innovation: A systematic review. Knowledge and Process Management, 27(3), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/KPM.1637
  12. Chen, S., & Yu, D. (2022). Exploring the impact of external collaboration on firm growth capability: the mediating roles of R&D efforts. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2022 9:1, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01429-5
  13. Chen, Z., Chowdhury, S., Davidson, A., Dey, P. K., Geiger, A. M., Long, S., Mar, P., Mohr, C., Rajah, R. B., Schlenk-Barnsdorf, L. von, & Woeffray, O. (2022). Future Readiness of SMEs and Mid-Sized Companies: A Year On.
  14. Coltman, T., Devinney, T. M., Midgley, D. F., & Venaik, S. (2008). Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1250–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2008.01.013
  15. Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479–516. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099.
  16. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
  17. Dai, Y. de, Dai, Y. Y., Chen, K. Y., & Wu, H. C. (2013). Transformational vs transactional leadership: Which is better?: A study on employees of international tourist hotels in Taipei City. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 25(5), 760–778. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-DEC-2011-0223/FULL/XML
  18. DiLiello, T. C., Houghton, J. D., & Dawley, D. (2011). Narrowing the creativity gap: The moderating Effects of Perceived Support for Creativity. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/00223980.2010.548412, 145(3), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2010.548412
  19. Dong, J., Xu, W., & Cha, J. (2021). Rural entrepreneurship and job creation: the hybrid identity of village-cadre-entrepre-neurs. China Economic Review, 70, 101704. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHIECO.2021.101704
  20. Drew, C. (2022, July 25). 10 Transformational Leadership Weaknesses . Helpful Professor. https://helpfulprofessor.com/transformational-leadership-weaknesses/
  21. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organiza¬tional support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
  22. Eisenberger, R., & Stinglhamber, F. (2011). Perceived organizational support: Fostering enthusiastic and productive employees. Perceived Organizational Support: Fostering Enthusiastic and Productive Employees. https://doi.org/10.1037/12318-000
  23. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social Exchange Theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2946096
  24. Fan, C., Tang, S., Chen, L., & Sun, T. (2022). Perceived organizational support and proactive innovation behavior: The mediating role of basic psychological needs. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1012. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2022.804363/BIBTEX
  25. Fasbender, U., Gerpott, F. H., & Unger, D. (2021). Give and take? Knowledge exchange between older and younger employees as a function of generativity and development striving. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(10), 2420–2443. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2020-0856/FULL/XML
  26. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (2018). Evaluating structural equation models with unobser¬vable variables and measurement error: Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  27. Frishammar, J., Kurkkio, M., Abrahamsson, L., & Lichtenthaler, U. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of firms process innovation capability: A literature review and a conceptual framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(4), 519–529. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2012.2187660
  28. Ganguly, A., Talukdar, A., & Chatterjee, D. (2019). Evaluating the role of social capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(6), 1105–1135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2018-0190/FULL/XML
  29. Grieve, J., Lukesch, R., Weinspach, U., Fernandes, P. A., Brakalova, M., Cristiano, S., Geissendorfer, M., Nemes, G., O’Gready, S., Sepulveda, R. O., Pfefferkorn, W., Pollermann, K., Pylkkanen, P., Ricci, C., & Slee, W. (2011). Capturing impacts of Leader and of measures to improve Quality of Life in rural areas. https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.99363
  30. Gupta, V. (2020). Relationships between leadership, motivation and employee-level innovation: evidence from India. Personnel Review, 49(7), 1363–1379. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2019-0595
  31. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12.
  32. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Https://Doi.Org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  33. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: part I – method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0094/FULL/XML
  34. Hartley, J. (2014). Some thoughts on Likert-type scales. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 14(1), 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70040-7
  35. Homans, G. C. (1961). The Humanities and the Social Sciences. American Behavioral Scientist, 4(8), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426100400802
  36. Hottenrott, H., & Lopes‐Bento, C. (2016). R&D partnerships and innovation performance: Can there be too much of a good thing?. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(6), 773-794.
  37. Hu, H., Gu, Q., & Chen, J. (2013). How and when does transformational leadership affect organizational creativity and innovation?: Critical review and future directions. Nankai Business Review International, 4(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/20408741311323344/FULL/XML
  38. Husein, M. (2021). Budaya dan Kerakteristik Masyarakat Pedesaan. Aceh Anthropo-logical Journal, 5(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.29103/aaj.v5i2.5624
  39. Ibrahim, H. I., Isa, A., & Shahbudin, A. S. Md. (2016). Organizational support and creativity: The role of developmental experiences as a moderator. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00063-0
  40. Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Medical Education, 38(12), 1217–1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x
  41. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Staples, D. S. (2015). Exploring perceptions of organizational ownership of information and expertise. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045673, 18(1), 151–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045673
  42. Jonczyk Sédès, C. (2019). Mind your metaphors: early warning signals when rolling out strategy. Journal of Business Strategy, 40(3), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-12-2017-0190/FULL/XML
  43. Kania, I., Anggadwita, G., & Alamanda, D. T. (2021). A new approach to stimulate rural entrepreneurship through village-owned enterprises in Indonesia. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 15(3), 432–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-07-2020-0137/FULL/XML
  44. Kim, D., & Lee, R. P. (2010). Systems collaboration and strategic collaboration: their impacts on supply chain response-veness and market performance. Decision Sciences, 41(4), 955-981.
  45. Korschun, D. (2015). Boundary-spanning employees and relationships with external stakeholders: A social identity approach. Https://Doi.Org/10.5465/Amr.2012.0398, 40(4), 611–629. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2012.0398
  46. Kremer, H., Villamor, I., & Aguinis, H. (2019). Innovation leadership: Best-practice recommendations for promoting employee creativity, voice, and knowledge sharing. Business Horizons, 62(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2018.08.010
  47. Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2015). Perceived Organizational Support: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Organizational Support Theory. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0149206315575554, 43(6), 1854–1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575554
  48. Le Blanc, P. M., González-Romá, V., & Wang, H. (2021). Charismatic leadership and work team innovative behavior: The role of team task interdependence and team potency. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(2), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09663-6
  49. Le, P. B., & Lei, H. (2019). Determinants of innovation capability: the roles of transformational leadership, knowledge sharing and perceived organizational support. Journal of Knowledge Mana-gement, 23(3), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2018-0568/FULL/XML
  50. Lie, D. A., Richter-Lagha, R., Forest, C. P., Walsh, A., & Lohenry, K. (2017). When less is more: validating a brief scale to rate interprofessional team competencies. Medical Education Online, 22(1), 1314751. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2017.1314751
  51. Lin, H. F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: An empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3–4), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720710755272/FULL/XML
  52. Lin, H. F. (2017). Impact of organizational support on organizational intention to facilitate knowledge sharing. Https://Doi.Org/10.1057/Palgrave.Kmrp.8500083, 4(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1057/PALGRAVE.KMRP.8500083
  53. Lowik, S., Kraaijenbrink, J., & Groen, A. (2017). Antecedents and effects of individual absorptive capacity: A micro-foundational perspective on open innova-tion. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6), 1319–1341. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2016-0410/FULL/XML
  54. Masa’deh, R. (2016). The Role of Knowledge Management infrastructure in enhancing job satisfaction at aqaba five star hotels in Jordan. Communications and Network, 08(04), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.4236/CN.2016.84021
  55. Medir Tejado, L., & Pano, E. (2018). Modelling local autonomy and dependence through cooperative relations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(4), 410–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-01-2017-0013/FULL/XML
  56. Mendoza-Silva, A. (2020). Innovation capabi-lity: a systematic literature review. Euro-pean Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 707–734. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2019-0263/FULL/XML
  57. Mittal, S., & Dhar, R. L. (2015). Transfor-mational leadership and employee creativity: Mediating role of creative self-efficacy and moderating role of knowledge sharing. Management Decision, 53(5), 894–910. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2014-0464
  58. Mustika, S. I., Rahardjo, K., & Prasetya, A. (2020). The Effect of Perceived Organi-zational Support on Knowledge Sharing and Innovative Work Behavior. 61–64. https://doi.org/10.2991/AEBMR.K.201116.012.
  59. Mutmainnah, D., Yuniarsih, T., Disman, D., Sojanah, J., Rahayu, M., & Nusannas, I. S. (2022). The impact of directive leadership on innovative work behavior: The mediation role of continuance commitment. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 37(3), 268–286. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.v37i3.3377
  60. Najafi-Tavani, S., Najafi-Tavani, Z., Naudé, P., Oghazi, P., & Zeynaloo, E. (2018). How collaborative innovation networks affect new product performance: Product innovation capability, process innovation capability, and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 73, 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.009
  61. Özarallı, N. (2015). Linking empowering leader to creativity: the moderating role of psycho¬logical (felt) empower-ment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 366-376.
  62. Pattnaik, S. C., & Sahoo, R. (2021). Transformational leadership and organi-zational citizenship behaviour: the role of job autonomy and supportive management. Management Research Review, 44(10), 1409–1426. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2020-0371/FULL/XML
  63. Payne, R. L., Lane, D., & Jabri, M. (1990). A Two-dimensional person-environment fit analysis of the performance, effort and satisfaction of research scientists. British Journal of Management, 1(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8551.1990.TB00155.X
  64. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  65. Pundt, A., Martins, E., & Nerdinger, F. W. (2010). Innovative behavior and the reciprocal exchange between employees and organizations. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung, 24(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/239700221002400205
  66. Rajapathirana, R. P. J., & Hui, Y. (2018). Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JIK.2017.06.002
  67. Rakhman, C. U., Kharisma, L., & Suryadana, M. L. (2017). Combination of Transformational and Community-Based Leadership Model in The Development of Pujon Kidul Tourism Village, Indonesia. Journal of Leadership in Organizations, 3(2).
  68. Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Wang, M., Roldán, J. L., & Kunasekaran, P. (2021). Are we in right path for mediation analysis? Reviewing the literature and proposing robust guidelines. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 48, 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.07.013
  69. Renko, S. (2018). The Concept of Sustainable Development. The Sustainable Marketing Concept in European SMEs, 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78754-038-520180003
  70. Reychav, I., & Weisberg, J. (2010). Bridging intention and behavior of knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Mana-gement, 14(2), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011032418/FULL/XML
  71. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Becker, J. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 27(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUSMJ.2019.05.003
  72. Saunila, M., Pekkola, S., & Ukko, J. (2014). The relationship between innovation capability and performance: The moderating effect of measurement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-04-2013-0065/FULL/XML
  73. Schiuma, G., Schettini, E., Santarsiero, F., & Carlucci, D. (2022). The transformative leadership compass: six competencies for digital transformation entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 28(5), 1273–1291. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2021-0087/FULL/XML
  74. Stinglhamber, F., Marique, G., Caesens, G., Desmette, D., Hansez, I., Hanin, D., & Bertrand, F. (2015). Employees’ organiza¬tional identification and affective organiza¬tional commitment: An integrative approach. PloS one, 10(4), e0123955.
  75. Stojčić, N. (2021). Collaborative innovation in emerging innovation systems: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(2), 531-562.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09792-8
  76. Suifan, T. S., Abdallah, A. B., & al Janini, M. (2018). The impact of transformational leadership on employees’ creativity: The mediating role of perceived organizational support. Management Research Review, 41(1), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2017-0032/FULL/XML
  77. Thomas, C., Maître, I., & Symoneaux, R. (2021). Consumer-led eco-development of food products: a case study to propose a framework. British Food Journal, 123(7), 2430–2448. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-11-2020-1050/FULL/XML
  78. TNP2K, N. T. for the A. of P. R., & Demo-graphic Institute, F. of E. and B. U. of I. (2021). Pemetaan Program Pemberdayaan Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM) (1st ed.). Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan KemiskinaN.
  79. Tofighi, D., & Kelley, K. (2020). Improved inference in mediation analysis: Introducing the model-based constrained optimization procedure. Psychological Methods, 25(4), 496–515. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000259
  80. Wakita, T., Ueshima, N., & Noguchi, H. (2012). Psychological distance between categories in the Likert scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(4), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164411431162
  81. Walters, G. D. (2019). Why are mediation effects so small? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1517232
  82. Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Manage¬ment, 7(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410565056/FULL/XML
  83. Weber, B., & Heidenreich, S. (2018). When and with whom to cooperate? Investigating effects of cooperation stage and type on innovation capabilities and success. Long Range Planning, 51(2), 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LRP.2017.07.003
  84. Xiao, Y., Zhang, X., & Ordóñez de Pablos, P. (2017). How does individuals’ exchange orientation moderate the relationship between transformational leadership and knowledge sharing? Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6), 1622–1639. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2017-0120/FULL/XML
  85. Yeşil, S., Büyükbeşe, T., & Koska, A. (2013). Exploring the link between knowledge sharing enablers, innovation capability and innovation performance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(04), 1350018.https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919613500187
  86. Yu, C., & Frenkel, S. J. (2013). Explaining task performance and creativity from perceived organizational support theory: Which mechanisms are more important? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(8), 1165–1181. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.1844
  87. Zhao, F. (2005). Exploring the synergy between entrepreneurship and innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 11(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550510580825/FULL/XML
Read More

Author Biographies

Ardy Wibowo, Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, 50139, Indonesia

Ardy Wibowo is a lecturer and researcher at the Department of Business Administration, Universitas Diponegoro (UNDIP), Indonesia where he has been a faculty member since 2024. He earned his Applied Bachelor’s degree in International Business Management at the Department of Business Administration, Politeknik Negeri Semarang, Indonesia. He did his Master’s degree in Master of Business Administration at National Kahosiung University of Scienve and Technology, Taiwan. Besides, he completed his Ph.D. from National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Taiwan. His research interests lie in the areas of digital marketing, consumer psychology, innovation & creativity management and entrepreneurship. He has collaborated actively with other researchers from various fields in many research projects. He successfully published many articles in different top tier international journals.

Defia Ifsantin Maula, Department of Management, Faculty of Economic and Business, Alma Ata University, 55184, Indonesia

Defia Ifsantin Maula is a lecturer and researcher at the Department of Management, Universitas Alma Ata, Indonesia where she has been a faculty member since 2018. She earned his Bachelor’s degree in Political Scinece at the Department of Politics and Government, Universitas Gadjah Mada , Indonesia. She did her Master’s degree in Master of Business Administration at Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia. Her research interests lie in the areas of entrepreneurship, leadership, and human resource management. She has collaborated actively with other researchers from various fields in many research projects. She successfully published many articles in different journals.

Dani Fikri Setiawan, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economic and Business, Alma Ata University, 55184, Indonesia

Dani Fikri Setiawan is a student at the Accounting Department of Alma Ata University, he has been a student since 2020.

Muhammad Hisam, Department of Management, Faculty of Economic and Business, Alma Ata University, 55184, Indonesia

Muhammad Hisam is a student in the Management Department of Alma Ata University, he has been a student since 2019.

Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 305 Download : 258