Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga
Abstract
Introduction. Performance evaluation is the process of evaluating the implementation of the tasks of organizational members, including libraries, in accordance with the performance standards using particular way including instruments. Instruments are needed to document the evaluation carried out by the organization. Therefore, libraries need to pay attention to developa performance evaluation instrument to plan their human resources. This research explains an overview of stages in developing performance evaluation instruments in an organization, particularly libraries.
Research methods. The research used a descriptive qualitative approach by involving the existing performance evaluation dimensions. After that, the performance evaluation indicators were developed.
Data analysis. The measurement of validity and reliability was valid when the correlation between items was >0.3 and when Cronbach alpha was > 0.6. The measurement of validity and reliability help to support the development of performance evaluation instruments.
Results and Discussion. Of the 36 statements, only 27 items were valid and used in performance appraisal instruments. The items are arranged in a model of development of the performance evaluation instruments.
Conclusion and recommendations. A good organization needs to pay attention to the right indicators in an assessment instrument. In its application, it is effective to use the 360 degree method, where employees are evaluated by other staff to ensure the balance professional perspective.
References
Abdullah, M. (2014). Manajemen dan evaluasi kinerja karyawan. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.
Amstrong, M. (2009). Handbook of performamce management. London: Kogan Page.
Bangun, W. (2012). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Bacal, R. (2012). Performamce management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Diniaty, D., & Muhamad, F. (2014). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja pegawai Perpustakaan UIN Suska Riau. Jurnal Sains, Teknologi dan Industri, 11(2), 297-304.
Dessler, G. (2013).Human resource management. London: Pearson/ Prentice Hall Inc.
Evita, S.N., Wa Ode Z.M., & Raden, T.W.A. (2017). Penilaian kinerja karyawan dengan menggunakan metode Behaviorally Anchor Rating Scale dan Management by Objectives (studi kasus pada PT Qwords Company International). Jurnal Pendidikan dan Bisnis, 9 (1), 18-32.
Hartono, A.R., & Setiawardani, M. (2017). Pengaruh evaluasi kinerja terhadap komitmen organisasional karyawan. Jurnal Riset Bisnis dan Investasi, 3(1), 73-85.
Herlina, A., & Anityasari, M. (2014). Perancangan sistem pengukuran kinerja UPT Perpustakaan ITS dengan metode Balanced Scorecard. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Manajemen Teknologi XXI, Program Studi MMT-ITS, Surabaya 19 Juli.
Kristiyanti, M. (2012).Peran indikator kinerja dalam mengukur kinerja manajemen. Majalah Ilmiah Informatika, 3(3), 103-123.
Kreitner, R., & Angelo, K. (2010). Organizational behaviour. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kumentas, C.N. (2013). Pengaruh TQM, sistem pengukuran kinerja dan penghargaan terhadap
kinerja manajerial PT. Pos Indonesia. Jurnal EMBA, 1(3), 796-805.
Mathis, R.L., & John, H.J. (2011). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Noe, R., John, R.H., Barry, G & Patrick, M.W. (2010). Manajemen sumber daya manusia, mencapai keunggulan bersaing. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Rahadi, D.R. (2010). Manajemen kinerja sumber daya manusia. Malang: Tunggal Mandiri
Rivai, V., Ramly, M., Mutis, T., & Arafah, W. (2014). Manajemen sumber daya manusia untuk perusahaan dari teori ke praktik (edisi ke-3). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Saleh, A.R., & Komalasari, R. (2014). Manajemen perpustakaan. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Setiawan, R. (2014). Pengaruh evaluasi kinerja terhadap kepuasan kerja dengan kompensasi dan pengembangan karier sebagai variabel intervening pada PT X di Probolinggo. Jurnal Agora, 2 (1), 343-350.
Sofyani, H., & Akbar, R. (2015). Hubungan karakteristik pegawai pemerintah daerah dan implementasi sistem pengukuran kinerja: Perspektif ismorfisma institusional. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 19(2), 153-173.
Sujarweni, V.W. (2014). Metode penelitian: lengkap, praktis, dan mudah dipahami. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.
Sugiyono. (2012).Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta
Sulaiman & Suprapto. (2019). Model evaluasi kinerja pustakawan sebagai dasar pengembangan profesionalisme pustakawan di PTKIN Indonesian. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 3 (1), 51-64.
Wirawan. (2015). Evaluasi kinerja sumber daya manusia: Teori, aplikasi dan penelitian. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
_______________. (2007). Undang-undang Nomor 43 tahun 2007 tentang perpustakaan.
Wijayanti, A & Supra, W. (2012). Evaluasi dan pengembangan sistem penilaian kinerja pada PT HKS. Jurnal Psikologi Undip, 11(2), 1-14.
Copyright (c) 2020 Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Articles published in Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
- Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
- By publishing in Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.