Pengaruh algoritma filter bubble dan echo chamber terhadap perilaku penggunaan internet
Abstract
Introduction. This study aims to explore effects of bubble filter and echo chamber on information searching behaviour on the internet, how it affects the scope of the internet ecosystem and users, and what we can see from the behaviour.
Data Collection Method. The paper used a mixed-methods approach with surveys, online discussions, and literature research. Twenty respondents between 19-21 years old participated in this exploratory study.
Analysis Data. Data was obtained and calculations have automatically accumulated through Google Form. The user data analysis and discussion were conducted manually by considering aspects of rationality concerning the literature and previous research.
Results and Discussions. The analysis results obtained were bubble filter and echo chambers were proven to affect internet users both in positive and negative ways.
Conclusions. Bubble filter and echo chamber may have both positive and negative effects simultaneously, however, it depends on the user because the system has provided control features to reduce both features. Using internet wisely is also parts of the important aspect.
References
Annas, F. B., Petranto, H. N., & Pramayoga, A. A. (2019). Opini publik dalam polarisasi politik di media sosial. Jurnal PIKOM (Penelitian Komunikasi dan Pembangunan), 20(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.31346/jpikom.v20i2.2006
Bozdag, E., & Van Den Hoven, J. (2015). Breaking the filter bubble: democracy and design. Ethics and information technology, 17(4), 249-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-015-9380-y.
Geschke, D., Lorenz, J., & Holtz, P. (2019). The triple‐filter bubble: Using agent‐based modelling to test a meta‐theoretical framework for the emergence of filter bubbles and echo chambers. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(1), 129-149.
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public opinion quarterly, 80(S1), 298-320.
Nguyen, C.T. (2020). Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles. Episteme, 17(2), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.32.
Borgesius, F.J.Z, Trilling, D., Möller, J., Bodó, B., De Vreese, C. H., & Helberger, N. (2016). Should we worry about filter bubbles?. Internet Policy Review. Journal on Internet Regulation, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.14763/2016.1.401
Rader, E., & Gray, R. (2015, April). Understanding user beliefs about algorithmic curation in the Facebook news feed. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 173-182).
Hannak, A., Sapiezynski, P., Molavi Kakhki, A., Krishnamurthy, B., Lazer, D., Mislove, A., & Wilson, C. (2013, May). Measuring personalization of web search. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 527-538).
GCFLearn. (2019). Digital Media Literacy: What is an Echo Chamber? https://edu.gcfglobal.org/en/digital-media-literacy/what-is-an-echo-chamber/1/
Haim, M., Graefe, A., & Brosius, H. B. (2018). Burst of the Filter Bubble?: Effects of personalization on the diversity of Google News. Digital Journalism, 6(3), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1338145
Hartono, D. (2018). Era post-truth : Melawan hoax dengan fact checking. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Prodi Ilmu Pemerintahan 2018 Era (pp. 70–82). http://repository.fisip-untirta.ac.id/952/
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (n.d.). Arti kata polarisasi - Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) Online. https://kbbi.web.id/polarisasi
Masrizal, M. (2012). Mixed method research. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Andalas, 6(2), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.24893/JKMA.V6I2.89
Paramita, S., Loisa, R., Setyanto, Y., & Indiarma, V. (2019). Filter Gelembung, Ruang Bergema, dan Personaliasi Algoritma. Buku Litera Yogyakarta. https://works.bepress.com/sinta-paramita/32/download/
Pariser, E. (2011a). Beware online “filter bubbles.” USA: Youtube TED. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8ofWFx525s
Pariser, E. (2011b). The filter bubble : how the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. Penguin Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press.
Wilson, J. Q. (2005). Politics and Polarization, Religion and Polarization.
Wisnuhardana, A. (2018). Anak Muda & Medsos Memahami Geliat Anak Muda, Media Sosial, dan Kepemimpinan Jokowi dalam Ekosistem Digital. Kompas Gramedia.
Copyright (c) 2021 Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Articles published in Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
- Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
- By publishing in Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
