Tinjauan literatur argumentatif tentang kepemilikan data arsip digital non-fungible token (NFT) pada teknologi blockchain
Abstract
Introduction. NFT scheme is used to certify the authenticity of digital records. It is also to provide a code for the original (genuine) data recorded on the blockchain. NFT creates a single data that cannot be duplicated in digital records. The misuse of NFT authentication to illegally certify other people's data have become a problem.
Data Collection Methods. This study used an argumentative literature review with a qualitative approach. It used literature data sources from various fields related to the basic concepts of archival science as a basic analysis.
Data Analysis. The analysis process consisted of several stages, namely reading the reviewed literature, summarising, analysing, and synthesising them critically and deeply.
Results and Discussion. The concept of development related to data ownership issues can be formulated by collaborating with user communities, developers, and digital service designers (ecosystems). As a preventive measure, understanding the logistical consequences of data security threats was very helpful. This included authenticity, integrity, confidentiality, and authorisation, they served as important points to reduce risk.
Conclusion. The NFT concept continues to develop dynamically. A more in-depth study and the involvement of archival science are necessary, thus, NFT scheme can build trust in digital records regarding the issue of data ownership.
References
Bal, M., & Ner, C. (2019). NFTracer: A non-fungible token tracking proof-of-concept using hyperledger fabric. Arxiv.Org. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.04795
Batista, D., Kim, H., Lemieux, V. L., Stancic, H., & Unnithan, C. (2021). Blockchains and provenance: How a technical system for tracing origins, ownership and authenticity can transform social trust. In Building Decentralized Trust (pp. 111–128). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54414-0_6
Batista, D., & Lemieux, V. (2019). Bounded and shielded: Assessing security aspects and trustworthiness of smart contracts. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes Du Congrès Annuel de l’ACSI. https://doi.org/10.29173/CAIS1063
Borglund, E., & Engvall, T. (2016). Authenticity in open data: Contributions from archival science. Interparestrust.Org, 1. https://interparestrust.org/assets/public/dissemination/WORKSHOPPAPERFINALOPENDATA_AUTHENTICITY.pdf
Clinten, B. (2021). Mengenal NFT, aset kripto yang tengah naik daun. Tekno.Kompas.Com. https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2021/03/15/15460097/mengenal-nft-aset-kripto-yang-tengah-naik-daun?page=all
Cornelius, K. (2020). Smart contracts as evidence: Trust, records, and the future of decentralized transactions. In J. Hunsinger, M. M. Allen, & L. Klastrup (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Internet Research (pp. 627–646). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1555-1_28
Cornelius, K. (2021). Betraying Blockchain: Accountability, Transparency and Document Standards for Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). Journal Information, 12(9), 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12090358
Das, D., Bose, P., Ruaro, N., & Kruegel, C. (2021). Understanding security issues in the NFT ecosystem. Arxiv.Org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.08893
Demoulin, M., Bushey, J., & McLelland, R. (2018). How to assess cloud service contracts?: A checklist for trustworthy records in the cloud. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10766 LNCS, 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_22
Deng, Z., Ren, Y., Liu, Y., Yin, X., Shen, Z., & Kim, H. J. (2019). Blockchain-based trusted electronic records preservation in cloud storage. Computers, Materials and Continua, 58(1), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.32604/CMC.2019.02967
Dhaulagiri, D. (2021). NFT dan seni kripto dianggap masa depan, kasus Kendra membuktikan ada lubang besar di sana. Whiteboard Journal. https://www.whiteboardjournal.com/ideas/art/nft-dan-seni-kripto-dianggap-masa-depan-kasus-kendra-membuktikan-ada-lubang-besar-di-sana/
Duff, W. (2011). Issues of authenticity, social accountability, and trust with electronic records. The Information Society, 17(4), 229–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/019722401753330823
Fan, G. (2018). Making better out of technologies: Responses of interpares to digital records management challenges. KDIR. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007230803870397
Findlay, C. (2017). Participatory cultures, trust technologies and decentralisation: Innovation opportunities for recordkeeping. Archives and Manuscripts, 45(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2017.1366864
Gibson, J. (2021). The thousand-and-second tale of NFTs, as foretold by Edgar Allan Poe. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 11(3), 249–269. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/11-3/qmjip.2021.03.00.xml
Gilliland, A. J., & Mckemmish, S. (2012). Recordkeeping metadata, the archival multiverse, and societal grand challenges. Dcpapers.Dublincore.Org, 106–115. https://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/3661
Gilliland, Rouche, N., Lindberg, L., & Evans, J. (2005). Towards a 21st century metadata infrastructure supporting the creation, preservation and use of trustworthy records: Developing the InterPARES 2 metadata schema registry. Archival Science, 5(1), 43–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-9000-4
Information Resources Management Association. (2019). Web services: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (Information Resources Management Association (ed.); 1st editio). Engineering Science Reference.
Jeong, S. Y. (2021). Value of NFTs in the digital art sector and its market research [Sotheby’s Institute of Art New York]. https://digitalcommons.sia.edu/stu_theses/101
Lafountain, C. (2021). Non-fungible tokens, libraries, and publishers. Information Today, Inc. https://www.infotoday.com/OnlineSearcher/Articles/Features/NonFungible-Tokens-Libraries-and-Publishers-147856.shtml
Legault, M. (2021). A practitioner’s view on distributed storage systems: Overview, challenges and potential solutions. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(6), 32–41. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1448
Lemieux, V. L. (2016). Blockchain for recordkeeping: Help or hype? SSHRC Knowledge Competition, Canada, October. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309414276_Blockchain_for_Recordkeeping_Help_or_Hype
Lemieux, V. L. (2017). Blockchain and distributed ledgers as trusted recordkeeping systems. FTC. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Victoria-Lemieux/publication/317433591_Blockchain_and_Distributed_Ledgers_as_Trusted_Recordkeeping_Systems_An_Archival_Theoretic_Evaluation_Framework/links/593aa6450f7e9b3317f4d860/Blockchain-and-Distributed-Ledgers-as
Lemieux, V. L. (2021). Blockchain and recordkeeping. Computers, 10(135), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10110135
Mackenzie, S., & Bērziņa, D. (2021). NFTs: Digital things and their criminal lives. Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal, 00(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/17416590211039797
Munster, B. (2021). People are stealing art and turning it into NFTs. Vice.Com. https://www.vice.com/en/article/n7vxe7/people-are-stealing-art-and-turning-it-into-nfts
Namasudra, S., Deka, G. C., Johri, P., Hosseinpour, M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2020). The revolution of blockchain: State-of-the-art and research challenges. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 2020, 28(3), 1497–1515. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11831-020-09426-0
Niranjanamurthy, M., Nithya, B. N., & Jagannatha, S. (2019). Analysis of blockchain technology: Pros, cons and SWOT. Cluster Computing, 22, 14743–14757. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10586-018-2387-5
Noor, M. U. (2020). Implementasi blockchain di dunia kearsipan: peluang, tantangan, solusi atau masalah baru? Khizanah Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, dan Kearsipan, 8(1), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.24252/kah.v8i1a9
Peraturan Kepala Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2011 tentang pedoman autentikasi arsip elektronik, 30 (2011). https://jdih.anri.go.id/peraturan/Perka 20_2011 fix.pdf
Priyanto, I. F. (2013). Apa dan mengapa ilmu informasi? Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan, 1(1), 55–59. http://journal.unpad.ac.id/jkip/article/view/9611
Quirion, A. (2021). What is an NFT and why should archivists pay attention? Archeota, 7(1), 10–12. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/saasc_archeota/14/
Royal Society. (2018). Data ownership, rights and control: A reaching a common understanding. The Royal Society. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/projects/data-governance/data-ownership-rights-and-controls-October-2018.pdf
Sabaliauskas, S., Kaukėnas, T., Gražulis, D., & Žilinskienė, N. (2021). Physical activity and self-regulation as a precondition for future thinking and sustainable development. LASE Journal of Sport Science, 12(1), 57–73. https://www.journal.lspa.lv/images/2021_2/LASE_COVID-updated.pdf#page=58
Singh, J., & Singh, P. (2021). Distributed ownership model for Non‐Fungible Tokens. In Smart and Sustainable Intelligent Systems (pp. 307–321). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119752134.ch22
Society of American Archivists. (2021). SAA dictionary: Electronic record. SAA. https://dictionary.archivists.org/entry/electronic-record.html
Society of American Archivists. (2022). SAA dictionary: Authentication. SAA. https://dictionary.archivists.org/entry/authentication.html
University of Alabama. (2019). Types of literature reviews - how to conduct a literature review - research guides at University of Alabama. https://guides.lib.ua.edu/c.php?g=39963&p=253698
Uribe, D., Waters, G., & Io, G. (2020). Privacy laws, genomic data and non-fungible tokens. The Journal of The British Blockchain Association, 3(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.31585/JBBA-3-2-(5)2020
Wang, G., & Nixon, M. (2021). SoK. Proceedings of the 14th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing Companion, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3492323.3495577
Wang, Li, R., Wang, Q., & Chen, S. (2021). Non-fungible token (NFT): Overview, evaluation, opportunities and challenges. http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.07447
Wentzel, A. (2018). A guide to argumentative research writing and thinking: Overcoming challenges (1st ed.). Routledge.
Wijesuriya, G., & Sweet, J. (2018). Revisiting authenticity in the Asian context. The International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property.
Woodall, A., & Ringel, S. (2020). Blockchain archival discourse: Trust and the imaginaries of digital preservation. New Media and Society Journal, 22(12), 2200–2217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819888756
Copyright (c) 2022 Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Articles published in Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
- Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
- By publishing in Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
