“Bonus of Demography” as an Opportunity to Build Indonesian’s Welfare (Through the Role of Doctors in Primary Care in the STBM Program for Decreasing the Prevalence of Stunting)

https://doi.org/10.22146/rpcpe.50205

Mariatul Fadilah(1*)

(1) Department of Community Medicine and Public Health; Faculty of Medicine; Universitas Sriwijaya; Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Demographic bonus is a condition where the composition of the population of productive age (age range 15-65 years old) is greater than the number of non-productive age population. According to BPS predictions, in 2020-2045 Indonesia has the opportunity to experience a demographic bonus, in which the country will have around 180 million productive-aged people, while those who are not productive are 60 million. Currently, 3 to 4 unproductive people will be rewarded by 10 productive people. In 2018 the total population of Indonesia is 265 million with a composition of 133.17 million women and 131.88 million men, where the population dependency ratio of Indonesia is 47.9%, which means there are 47 to 48 unproductive residents (aged under 15 years old and over 65 years old) who will be borne by 100 productive age population (15-65 years old). The problem is not the quantity of productive population but more towards its quality, so large a number will really make a bonus for the development of the Indonesian nation or on the contrary the explosion of population in this productive age will be a disaster for this beloved nation.

Full Text:

PDF


References

1. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), World Health Organization, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank. Levels and trends in child malnutrition: Key findings of the 2019 Edition of the Joint Child Malnutrition Estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2019 Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

2. Perkins JM, Kim R, Krishna A, McGovern M, Aguayo VM, Subramanian SV. Understanding the association between stunting and child development in low-and middle-income countries: Next steps for research and intervention. Social Science & Medicine. 2017 Nov 1;193:101-9.

3. Nshimyiryo A, Hedt-Gauthier B, Mutaganzwa C, Kirk CM, Beck K, Ndayisaba A, et al. Risk factors for stunting among children under five years: a cross-sectional population-based study in Rwanda using the 2015 Demographic and Health Survey. BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec;19(1):175.

4. Director General of Disease Control and Environmental Health. The regulation of ministry of health Republic of Indonesia number 3 of 2014 about community-based total sanitation. Jakarta: Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia. 2014.

5. Adekanmbi VT, Kayode GA, Uthman OA. Individual and contextual factors associated with childhood stunting in Nigeria: A multilevel analysis. Maternal & Child Nutrition. 2013 Apr;9(2):244-59.

6. Spears D, Ghosh A, Cumming O. Open defecation and childhood stunting in India: An ecological analysis of new data from 112 districts. PloS One. 2013 Sep 16;8(9):e73784

7. Briceño B, Coville A, Martinez S. Promoting handwashing and sanitation: Evidence from a large-scale randomized trial in rural Tanzania. The World Bank. 2015 Jan 1.

8. Irwan. Health ethics and behavior. Ed I. Yogyakarta: CV. Absolut Media. 2017.

9. Craig SL, D’Souza S. Transtheoretical model of change. Oxford University Press. 2018 June 27. doi: 10.1093/OBO/9780195389678- 0268.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/rpcpe.50205

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 4857 | views : 2777

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Mariatul Fadilah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats