DOMINASI PENGUASA KOLONIAL TERHADAP BUMIPUTRA DALAM SURAT KERAJAAN PONTIANAK ABAD KE-19: ANALISIS PASCAKOLONIAL
Bagus Kurniawan(1*)
(1) Sastra Indonesia UNS Jln. Ir Sutami No 36-A Kentingan Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Process of colonialism in a long archipelago led to a number of colonial domination colonizers against the
colonized. It can be seen in the classical Malay literature. Slightly, it is different from the concept of literature in the
modern sense, in the sense of classical Malay literature, including royal scripts as a literary work. Therefore, the local
royal scripts archipelago in the 18th century period 19th addressed to the colonial power are a classical Malay literature
to inform the colonial domination of the colonized people. As such, this paper outlines the dominance of colonial powers
against colonized peoples contained in the classical Malay literature, especially the royal letter. Royal scripts that serve as
the object of study in this paper is a letter sent Pontianak Royal Prince Syarif Abu Bakar Al Qadri to JF Walrave van
Nes, dated May 16, 1847. The script indicates the inequality relationship between the subjects with the object. Colonial
authorities have the power to regulate and dominate the native people. Relations between the Kingdom of Pontianak
with no colonial power relations that have the same bargaining power politics, and the Kingdom of Pontianak act as a
party dominated politically, and economically. Therefore, the Pontianak Kingdom of the letter will be analyzed through
postcolonial theory to see a picture of the condition of literary colonialism Kingdom of Pontianak in the 19th century.
Keywords: colonialism, domination, royal scripts, postcolonial
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Daftar Pustaka
Boxer, C.R. 1983. Jan Kompeni dalam Perang
dan Damai (1602-1799). Jakarta: Sinar
Harapan.
Cowan, C.D. 1970. Tanah Melayu Kurun Kesembilan
Belas: Asal-usul Politik British. Kuala
Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Darban, Ahmad Adaby. 1990. Peran Serta Islam
dalam Perjuangan Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian
Sejarah Perjuangan Indonesia. Yogyakarta:
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam
Indonesia.
Djafaar, Irza Arnyta. 2007. Jejak Portugis di
Maluku Utara. Yogyakarta: Ombak.
Hanafi, Hassan. 2000. Oksidentalisme: Sikap Kita
Terhadap Tradisi Barat. Diterjemahkan oleh
M. Najib Buchori. Jakarta: Paramadina.
Lapian, A.B. 1975. Manusia dan Kebudayaan di Asia
Tenggara: Kolonialisme di Asia Tenggara, seri
studi wilayah nomor 2. Jakarta: Lembaga
Research Kebudayaan Nasional-LIPI.
Mu’jizah. 2009. Iluminasi dalam Sura-Surat
Melayu Abad ke-18 dan ke-19. Jakarta:
KPG, Ecole Francais d Extreme- Orient,
Pusat Bahasa—Departemen Pendidikan
Nasional, KITLV.
Loomba, Ania. 2003. Kolonialisme/
Pascakolonialisme. Yogyakarta: Bentang.
Pozzolini, A. 2006. Pijar-Pijar Pemikiran Gramsci.
Yogyakarta: Resist Book.
Reid, Anthony. 2004. Sejarah Modern Awal Asia
Tenggara: Sebuah Pemetaan. Ja k a r t a :
LP3ES.
Ricklefs, M.C. 1991. Sejarah Indonesia Modern.
Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University
Press.
Said, Edward. 1995. Kebudayaan dan Kekuasaan:
Memembongkar Mitos Hegemoni Barat.
Bandung: Mizan.
-------.2001. Orientalisme. Cet. Ke-4.
Diterjemahkan oleh Asep Hikmat.
Bandung: Pustaka
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/poetika.v1i1.10379
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 3084 | views : 31205Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2013 Poetika : Jurnal Ilmu Sastra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.