One visit root canal treatment using rotary instrument followed by semi-direct technique composite restoration

https://doi.org/10.22146/mkgk.54468

Lika Yodasari(1*), Diatri Nari Ratih(2)

(1) Program Studi Konservasi Gigi Program Pendidikan Dokter Gigi Spesialis, Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(2) Departemen Konservasi Gigi, Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


One visit root canal treatment is non-surgical conservative treatment of irreversible pulp disease or pulp necrosis. Treatment includes cleaning and shaping, sterilization, and obturation of root canal performed in one visit. The aim of this case report is to evaluate the success of one visit root canal treatment using rotary instrument followed by semi-direct composite restoration. A 23 year-old patient presented into dental hospital Faculty of Dentistry UGM to obtain treatment of leaking composite filling on his mandibular right molar that previously had been treated 1 year ago. The tooth was asymptomatic. Radiograph showed a cavity reaches the pulp and there was no periapical lesions, clinical examination showed necrosis. Patient was treated with one visit root canal treatment using rotary instrument followed by semi-direct technique of composite restoration. Five months after treatment the patient had no complaints. Radiographic examination showed no periapical lesions. One visit root canal treatment using rotary instrument followed by semiindirect technique composite restoration may be an effective treatment option when performed with case selection, proper diagnosis, aseptic work, as well as the appropriate operator’s knowledge and skills

Keywords


one visit root canal treatment; rotary instruments; semi-direct technique composite restoration

Full Text:

PDF


References

Carvalho AA, Moreira FCL, Cunha LM, Samara MM, Souza JB, Estrela C, Lopes LG. Marginal microleakage of class II composite resin restoration due to restorative techniques. Rev.odonto ciênc. 2010; 25(2): 165-169. 2. Cheung WA. Review of the management of edondotically treted teeth: post, core, and the final restoration. JADA. 2005; 136: 611-619. 3. Eccless JD, Green RM. Konservasi gigi (terj). Ed 2. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas; 1994. 145-150. 4. Ingle Jl, Gooddacre CJ. Endodontics. 6th Ed. Hamilton: BC Decker Inc.; 2008. 922-1011. 5. Londhe SM, Garge BHG. Single visit root canal treatment. MJAFI. 2007; 63. 6. Pitt Ford TR. Restorasi Gigi (terj). Ed 2. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kedokteran EGC; 1993. 7. Rustin SA, Endang R. Perawatan saluran akar satu kunjungan pada gigi premolar kedua kiri mandibula dengan nekrosis pulpa disertai lesi periapikal. Maj Ked Gigi. 2007; 14(1): 23-28. 8. Moghaddam K, Mehran M, Zadeh H. Root canal cleaning efficacy of rotary and hand files instrumentation in primary molar. Iran Endod J. 2009; 4(2): 53-57. 9. Chandrasekhar P, Shetty RU, Adlakha T, Shende S, Podar R. A comparison of two NiTy rotary system, ProTaper Next and Silk for root canal cleaning ability (an in vitro study). Indian Journal of Conservative and Endodontics. 2016; 1(1): 22-24. 10. Eliyas S, Jalili J, Martin N. Restoration of the root canal treated tooth. BDJ. 2015; 218(2): 53-62. 11. Xie KX, Wang XY, Gao XY, Yuan CY, Li JX, Chu CH. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage. Int Endod J. 2012; 45: 524-529. 12. Aggarwal V, Logani A, Jain V, Shah N. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs indirect class II MO composite restorations. OD. 2008; 33(5): 587-592. 13. Nandini S. Indirect resin composite. J Conserv Dent. 2010; 13(4): 184-194. 14. Ruddle CJ. Protaper technique: shaping the future of endodontics. Endod Topics. 2005. 15. Amda N, Jekti J, Trilaksana AC, Rovani CA, Natsir N, Mattulada KI. Penilaian kebersihan sepertiga apikal dinding saluran akar dari smear layer dengan menggunakan rotary instrument dengan disain convex triangular dan rectangular cross section. 2015; 14(1): 65-70. 16. Violich, Chandler NP. The smear layer in endodontics- a review. Int Endod J. 2010; 42: 2-15. 17. Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N. Root canal irrigants. Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2010; 13(4): 256-264. 18. Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owartz CB. Enterococcus faecalis: its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. JOE. 2006; 32(2): 93-98.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/mkgk.54468

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 3940 | views : 9827

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2020 MKGK (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Klinik) (Clinical Dental Journal) UGM

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View my stats

site stats