Exploring Leadership in Kedaireka Ecosystem Programs as a Matchmaking Platform Between Universities and Industries

Taufan Teguh Akbari; Mohammad Reevany Bustami

doi:10.22146/jlo.92979

Exploring Leadership in Kedaireka Ecosystem Programs as a Matchmaking Platform Between Universities and Industries

https://doi.org/10.22146/jlo.92979

Taufan Teguh Akbari^(1*), Mohammad Reevany Bustami⁽²⁾

(1) Centre for Sustainability and Leadership Excellence LSPR Institute of Communication and Business
(2) Centre for Policy Research & International Studies, Universitas Sains Malaysia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction/Main Objectives: This research examines the leadership approach implemented in the Kedaireka platform to unify leaders from various sectors. It studies the factors that motivate leaders across sectors to collaborate and the roles played by these leaders. Background Problems: In Indonesia, the Ministry of Education and Culture has established a collaborative ecosystem named Kedaireka. Kedaireka has developed research-based solutions to address societal problems three years after its founding. However, this study represents the first detailed examination of leadership practices within the platform. Novelty: This research focuses on the leadership practices within the Kedaireka ecosystem. The findings of this study serve as a reference for leading multi-actor ecosystems. Research Methods: This research employs a qualitative approach, utilizing the case study method. The author employed Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and interviews for data collection. Finding/Results: The author identifies that Kedaireka's foundation is built on shared and agile collaborative leadership within its multi-actor partnerships. The leadership at Kedaireka prioritizes dynamic and transparent communication with stakeholders. A thorough and rigorous monitoring and evaluation system is in place, facilitating the development of impactful research that benefits society. Conclusion: Leadership characterized by humility, innovation, equitable distribution, and a focus on mutual benefits can serve as a model for organizations across Indonesia. These qualities have proven effective within Kedaireka, notably in delivering significant benefits to stakeholders ranging from universities to the industrial sector.

Keywords

Collaborative Ecosystem; Digital Platform; Kedaireka; Leadership; Multi-Actor Partnership

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adji, R. P. (2022, December 27). Matching fund kedaireka UNS sukses ciptakan panel surya berbasis zat warna. Retrieved from UNS. https://uns.ac.id/id/uns-update/matching-fund-kedaireka-uns-sukses-ciptakan-panel-surya-berbasis-zat-warna.html

Ali, M., Zhang, L., Shah, S. J., Khan, S., & Shah, A. M. (2020). Impact of humble leadership on project success: the mediating role of psychological empowerment and innovative work behavior. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2019-0230

Arjoon, S. (2000). Virtue theory as a dynamic theory of business. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006339112331

Autio, E., & Thomas, L. D. W. (2014). Innovation Ecosystems: Implications for Innovation Management. In M. Dodgson, D. M. Gann, & N. Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management (pp. 204–288). OUP Oxford.

Azizah, N. (2023, June 13). Produk herbal hasil penelitian UMJ raih pendanaan Matching Fund Kedaireka 2023. Retrived from Republika. https://news.republika.co.id/berita/rw61ge463/produk-herbal-hasil-penelitian-umj-raih-pendanaan-matching-fund-kedaireka-2023

Becuwe, H., Tondeur, J., Roblin, N. P., Thys, J., & Castelein, E. (2018). Teacher design teams as a strategy for professional development: The role of the facilitator. In J. Voogt & J. Pieters (Eds.), Teacher Learning Through Teacher Teams (1^st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.4324/9781315123431-3

Bowen, K. J., & Ebi, K. L. (2015). Governing the health risks of climate change: Towards multi-sector responses. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability: Towards Multi-Sector Responses, 12, 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.12.001

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross‐sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432

Bucăţa, G., & Rizescu, A. M. (2017). The role of communication in enhancing work effectiveness of an organization. Land Forces Academy Review, 22(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1515/raft-2017-0008

Butt, A., Naaranoja, M., & Savolainen, J. (2016). Project change stakeholder communication. International Journal of Project Management, 34(8), 1579–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.010

Chou, M.-H., Jungblut, J., Ravinet, P., & Vukasovic, M. (2017). Higher education governance and policy: An introduction to multi-issue, multi-level and multi-actor dynamics. Policy and Society, 36(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1287999

Choy, J., McCormack, D., & Djurkovic, N. (2016). Leader-member exchange and job performance. Journal of Management Development, 35(1), 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-06-2015-0086

Comi, A., & Whyte, J. (2018). Future making and visual artefacts: An ethnographic study of a design project. Organization Studies, 39(8), 1055–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617717094

Dalglish, S. L., Khalid, H., & McMahon, S. A. (2021). Document analysis in health policy research: The READ approach. Health Policy and Planning, 35(10), 1424–1431. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa064

Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S. J., & Roland Ortt, J. (2018). Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.028

Denning, S. (2018). Succeeding in an increasingly agile world. Strategy & Leadership, 46(3), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/SL-03-2018-0021

D’Innocenzo, L., Mathieu, J. E., & Kukenberger, M. R. (2016). A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadership–team performance relations. Journal of Management, 42(7), 1964–1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314525205

de Jong, W., Lockhorst, D., de Kleijn, R., Noordegraaf, M., & van Tartwijk, J. (2022). Leadership practices in collaborative innovation: A study among Dutch school principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(6), 928-944. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220962098

Ejimabo, N. O. (2015). The influence of decision making in organizational leadership and management activities. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Organization Management, 04(02). https://doi.org/10.4172/2169-026X.1000138

Eskerod, P., Huemann, M., & Savage, G. (2015). Project stakeholder management—past and present. Project Management Journal, 46(6), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21555

Foss, N. J., Schmidt, J., & Teece, D. J. (2023). Ecosystem leadership as a dynamic capability. Long Range Planning, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102270

Fry, C. V., Lynham, J., & Tran, S. (2023). Ranking researchers: Evidence from Indonesia. Research Policy, 52(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104753

Gandolfi, F., & Stone, S. (2014). Clarifying leadership: High-impact leaders in a time of leadership crisis. Revista de Management Comparat Internațional, 212–224.

García-Martín, M., Bieling, C., Hart, A., & Plieninger, T. (2016). Integrated landscape initiatives in Europe: Multi-sector collaboration in multi-functional landscapes. Land Use Policy, 58, 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.001

Van Graan, J. (2016). Multi-sector cooperation in preventing crime: The case of a South African Neighbourhood Watch as an effective crime prevention model. Police Practice and Research, 17(2), 136-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2015.1128159

Hermawan, D. (2023, August 10). Dukung pengembangan ekonomi, tim Matching Fund-Kedaireka UNNES Serahkan 15 Unit Panci Presto Elektrik. Retrieved from UNS. https://unnes.ac.id/dukung-pengembangan-ekonomi-tim-matching-fund-kedaireka-unnes-serahkan-15-unit-panci-presto-elektrik/

Hill, N. S., & Bartol, K. M. (2016). Empowering leadership and effective collaboration in geographically dispersed teams. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 159–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12108

Holton, J. A. (2007). The coding process and its challenges. In A. Bryant, & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory. (pp.265-289). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Joiner, B. (2019). Leadership agility for organizational agility. Journal of Creating Value, 5(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394964319868321

Jokisaari, M., & Vuori, J. (2018). Leaders’ resources and newcomer socialization: the importance of delegation. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2016-0274

Kahn, K. B. (2018). Understanding innovation. Business Horizons, 61(3), 453-460.

Kuenkel, P. (2015). Navigating change in complex multi-actor settings: A practice approach to better collaboration. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 119–136. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.ju.000012

Lukihardianti, A. (2022, September 29). Tahun ini, 7 dosen UPI dapat pendanaan program Kedaireka miliaran. Republika.

Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., Paoletti, J., Burke, C. S., & Salas, E. (2018). Does team communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach?: A meta-analysis of team communication and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144, 145–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.08.001

Medina-García, C., Nagarajan, S., Castillo-Vysokolan, L., Béatse, E., & Van Den Broeck, P. (2022). Innovative multi-actor collaborations as collective actors and institutionalized spaces. The case of food governance transformation in Leuven (Belgium). Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.788934

Mitchell, G. E., O’Leary, R., & Gerard, C. (2015). Collaboration and performance: Perspectives from Public managers and NGO leaders. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(4), 684–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1031015

Mukhopadhyay, S., & Bouwman, H. (2018). Multi-actor collaboration in platform-based ecosystem: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 20(2), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2018.1479160

Murphy, M., Arenas, D., & Batista, J. M. (2015). Value creation in cross-sector collaborations: The roles of experience and alignment. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2204-x

Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820941288

Newman, A., Tse, H. H. M., Schwarz, G., & Nielsen, I. (2018). The effects of employees’ creative self-efficacy on innovative behavior: The role of entrepreneurial leadership. Journal of Business Research, 89, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.001

Nyumba, T. O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860

Oktavia, V. (2022, December 13). Kolaborasi dengan Industri, Itera kembangkan sistem pertanian pintar. Retrieved from Kompas.Id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/humaniora/2022/12/13/kolaborasi-dengan-industri-itera-kembangkan-sistem-pertanian-pintar

Pera, R., Occhiocupo, N., & Clarke, J. (2016). Motives and resources for value co-creation in a multi-stakeholder ecosystem: A managerial perspective. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4033–4041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.047

Preston, J., & Barnes, K. E. R. (2018). Successful leadership in rural schools: Cultivating collaboration. The Rural Educator, 38(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v38i1.231

Puspita, R. (2022, January 5). Kepala BRIN jelaskan masalah riset di Indonesia. Retrieved from Republika. https://republika.co.id/berita/r57idw428/kepala-brin-jelaskan-masalah-riset-di-indonesia

Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 160940691986242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424

Rego, A., Cunha, M. P. e., & Simpson, A. V. (2018). The perceived impact of leaders’ humility on team effectiveness: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-3008-3

Renjith, V., Yesodharan, R., Noronha, J. A., & Ladd, E. (2020). Qualitative Methods in Health Care Research. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12(1), 20.

Rosenthal, M. (2016). Qualitative research methods: Why, when, and how to conduct interviews and focus groups in pharmacy research. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 8(4), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2016.03.021

Senge, P. M. (2003). The leaders new work: Building learning organizations. In A. Hooper (Ed.), Leadership Perspectives (1^st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315250601-6

Srivastava, P., & Jain, S. (2017). A leadership framework for distributed self-organized scrum teams. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 23(5/6), 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-06-2016-0033

Stebbins, R. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences. California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984249

Suciati. (2022, October 11). UNIPMA wujudkan desa mandiri energi dan pupuk melalui kegiatan Matching Fund Kedaireka. Retrieved from Times Indonesia. https://timesindonesia.co.id/indonesia-positif/431861/unipma-wujudkan-desa-mandiri-energi-dan-pupuk-melalui-kegiatan-matching-fund-kedaireka

Sudrajat, D., Iskandar, D., & Makarim, F. H. (2022, May 27). Lemahnya sistem pendanaan riset di Indonesia semakin terasa di tengah pandemi: Berikut pengalaman para dosen. Retrieved from The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/lemahnya-sistem-pendanaan-riset-di-indonesia-semakin-terasa-di-tengah-pandemi-berikut-pengalaman-para-dosen-183442

Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K. (2015). Leadership and organizational culture as the normative influence of top management on employee’s behaviour in the innovation process. Procedia Economics and Finance, 34, 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01646-9

Torfing, J. (2019). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: The argument. Public Management Review, 21(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248

Torfing, J., & Ansell, C. (2020). Strengthening political leadership and policy innovation through the expansion of collaborative forms of governance. In E. Sørensen (Ed.), Political Inovations (1^st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1200662

Un, C. A., & Asakawa, K. (2015). Types of R&D collaborations and process innovation: The benefit of collaborating upstream in the knowledge chain. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12229

van Tulder, R., & Keen, N. (2018). Capturing collaborative challenges: Designing complexity-sensitive theories of change for cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3857-7

van Tulder, R., Seitanidi, M. M., Crane, A., & Brammer, S. (2016). Enhancing the impact of cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2756-4

Vangen, S., Hayes, J. P., & Cornforth, C. (2015). Governing cross-sector, inter-organizational collaborations. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1237–1260. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.903658

VanVactor, J. D. (2012). Collaborative leadership model in the management of health care. Journal of Business Research, 65(4), 555-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.021

Venugopalan, M., Bastian, B. L., & Viswanathan, P. K. (2021). The role of multi-actor engagement for women’s empowerment and entrepreneurship in Kerala, India. Administrative Sciences, 11(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010031

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jlo.92979