LANGUAGE APPRAISAL ON ATTITUDINAL SYSTEMS FOR EXPLORING IDEOLOGY IN DEATH PENALTY IN SYDNEY MORNING HERALD AND HERALD SUN EDITORIALS
Rosyida Ekawati(1*)
(1) English Study Program, Faculty of Social and Cultural Sciences University of Trunojoyo Madura
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This article deals with the ideology represented by newspaper editorials. It is from the idea that every language use is never neutral and not ideology-free. Language is used to convey meanings in a broad sense. There are meanings related to the opinions through the language as resources of evaluation. Editorial is one practice of language use full of opinions towards a certain issue on people or things. Sydney Morning Herald and Herald Sun are used as both Australian newspaper posit themselves as the high-rank newspaper in terms of circulation and online accessed. This article tries to uncover the ideologies represented by both newspaper editorials concerning death penalty of Bali Nine executed in Indonesia. Attitudinal perspective proposed by Martin and White (2005) in term of affect, judgement, and appreciation of language appraisal is used to explore ideology in the newspaper. From appraisal analysis, it is found that Indonesia dominantly appraised in negative There is no positive appreciation for Indonesia in both newspaper editorials. judgement while Australia is portrayed in positive view for the issue of death penalty in Indonesia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bloor, Thomas and Meriel Bloor. (2004). The Functional Analysis of English. A Hallidayan Approach. Second Edition. London: Arnold
Clark, Urszula. (2007). Studying Language. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Coffin, C. (2001). Theoretical Approaches to Written Language - a TESOLperspective. In Burns, A & Coffin, C (eds.). Analysing English in Global Context. Pp. 93-122. Routledge
Entman, R. M. (2007). Framing bias: media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 163-173.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. London: Longman Group Limited.
Fowler, R. (1986). Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Freeden, Michael. (2013). The Meaning of Ideology: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. London: Routledge
Gay, L.R., Mills, G.E. & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational Research. 8th edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1971). Linguistic Function and Literary Style: An Inquiry into the Language of William Golding’s the Inheritors. In Chatman, S. (Ed.), Literary Style: A Symposium (pp. 330-368). New York: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M.A.K. and Christian Matthissen. (2004). An Introduction To Functional Grammar. Third Edition. London: Hodder Arnold
Halliday, M.A.K. and Ruqaiya Hasan.(1989). Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Haratyan, Farzaneh. (2011). Halliday’s SFL and Social Meaning. 2nd International Conference on Humanities, Historical and Social Sciences. IPEDR vol.17, 2011. Singapore: IACSIT Press.
Imhonopi, D. & Urim, C. (2004) Current issues in Sociology of Mass Communication. Dugbe: Euphrates Publishers.
Martin, J. R. and P. R. R. White. (2005). The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
Medubi, O. (2007). The Fundamentals of Journalism. In Olu Obafemi, G.A. Ajadi, V.A Ababi (eds.) Critical perspectives on English language & literature. Ilorin: The Dept. of English. (p 105 and 116)
Storall, J. (2005). Journalism: who, what, when, where, why and how. Boston: Education Inc.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1996). Opinions and Ideologies in Editorials. Paper for the fourth international symposium of critical discourse analysis, language, social life and critical thought, Athens: 14 – 16 December 1995. Accessed March 15, 2015 http://www.hum.uva.nl/ teun/A/ideology2.htm
Van Dijk, Teun A. (2000). Ideology and Discourse. A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Open University.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis in Journal of Political Ideologies, No. 11(2) page 115-140, June 2006. Routledge
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.10596
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 3548 | views : 4079Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Rosyida Ekawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.