* Corresponding Author
20 years Collaborative Governance and Action Research: Evaluation Process of the Regional Spatial Planning of Mappi Regency, Papua
https://doi.org/10.22146/jpkm.46412 Doddy Aditya Iskandar(1*)
(1) Departemen Teknik Arsitektur dan Perencanaan Fakultas Teknik Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This paper evaluates planners’ capacity to influence the plan-making process where it often involves actors and institutions with various interests. Relegating planners’ roles by providing mere technical inputs to those who seek advice would not alleviate spatial imbalance and unequal power structure embedded in the community. Planners should be reflexive and accountable, as it will lead them to aspire to a contested ideal rather than to simply optimize the current system in which they are in. Drawing from our experience in reviewing regional spatial plan of Kabupaten Mappi, providing an alternative approach to current development strategies would help balancing the local community’s power structure. Planners should master the politics of planning as it would help them influence the decision-making process.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agranoff, R. 2006. Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66: 56-65. Ansell C. & Gash, A. 2008. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8: 543-571. Bachrach, P. & Baratz, M.S. 1962. Two Faces of Power. The American Political Science Review, 56 (4): 947-952 Benveniste, G. 1989. Mastering the Politics of Planning: Crafting credible plans and policies that make a difference (Jossey Bass Public Administration Series). Jossey-Bass. Bentley, G., Pugalis, L. & Shutt, J. 2017. Leadership and Systems of Governance: The constraints on the scope for leadership of place-based development in sub-national territories. Regional Studies, 51 (2): 194-209. Brenner, N., Peck, J. and Theodore, N. 2010. Variegated Neoliberalization Geographies, Modalities, Pathways. Global Networks, 10 (2): 182-222. Dowding, K. 2008. Agency and Structure: Interpreting power relationships. Journal of Power 1 (1): 21-36 Certoma, C. & Notteboom, B. 2017. Informal Planning in Transactive Governmentality: Re-reading planning practices through Ghent’s community gardens. Planning Theory, 16 (1): 51-73 Dahl, Robert. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and power in an American city. Yale University Press. Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T. & Balogh, S. 2011. An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22: 1-29. Emerson, K. & Murchie, P. 2010. Collaborative Governance and Climate Change: Opportunities for public administration. In O’Leary, R., Van Slyke, D. & Kim, S. (eds). 2010. The Future of Public Administration, Public Management, and Public Service Around the World: The Minnowbrook perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University. Forester, J. 1984. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press. Geddes, M. 2010. Building and Contesting Neoliberalism at the Local Level: Reflections on the symposium and on recent experience in Bolivia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34 (1): 163-173. Hunter, F. 1953. Community Power Structure: A study of decision makers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Johnston, E.W., Hicks, D., Nan, N. & Auer, J.C. 2011. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21 (4): 699-721. Leck, H. & Simon, D. 2013. Fostering Multiscalar Collaboration and Co-operation for Effective Governance of Climate Change Adaptation. Urban Studies, 50 (6): 1221-1238. Logan, J.R. & Molotch, H. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The political economy of place. University of California Press. Molotch, Harvey. 1976. The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82 (2): 309-322. Nichols, W. 2003. Forging a “New” Organizational Infrastructure for Los Angeles’s Progressive Community. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27 (4): 881-896. Ozdemir, Esin. 2019. The Role of the Expert Knowledge in Politicizing Urban Planning Processes: A case from Istanbul. Planning Theory, 18 (2): 237-259. Pansardi, P. 2012. Power to and Power Over: Two distinct concept of power? Journal of Political Power, 5 (1): 73-89. Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan Republik Indonesia no. P.18/Menhut-II/2011 tentang Pedoman Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan. Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Mappi. 2012. Peraturan Daerah no. 5 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kabupaten Mappi 2012-2031. Kepi, Mappi: Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Mappi. Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Mappi. 2017. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah 2017-2022. Kepi, Mappi: Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kab. Mappi Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Mappi. 2012. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah 2012-2017. Kepi, Mappi: Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kab. Mappi Ploger, J. 2008. Foucault’s Dispositif and the City. Planning Theory, 7 (51): 51-70. Stone, Clarence N. 1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. University Press of Kansas: Lawrence, KS Thomson, A.M. & Perry, J.L. 2006. Collaboration Processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66 (s1): 20-32. Uitermark, J. & Nichols, W. 2017. Planning for Social Justice: Strategies, dilemmas, tradeoffs. Planning Theory, 16 (1): 32-50. Voorn, B., van Genugten, M. & van Thiel, S. 2019. Multiple Principals, Multiple Problems: Implications for effective governance and a research agenda for joint service delivery. Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12587
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpkm.46412
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 1720
| 
views : 1469
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (Indonesian Journal of Community Engagement)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (Indonesian Journal of Community Engagement)