Gambaran Kriteria Robson pada Ibu Bersalin dengan Preeklampsia

https://doi.org/10.22146/jkr.76694

Dewi Nurlaelasari(1*), Andriana Kumala Dewi(2)

(1) Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Tarumanagara
(2) Departemen Obstetri dan Ginekologi, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Abstract

Preeclampsia is hypertension in pregnancy which is associated with 2-8% of pregnancy-related complications worldwide. It causes 9-26% of maternal deaths in low-income countries and 16% in high-income countries. This study aims to determine the prevalence and characteristics of pregnant women with preeclampsia who underwent cesarean section based on Robson's criteria at Sumber Waras Hospital, West Jakarta. This research methodology uses a descriptive method with a cross-sectional design with a total sample of 55 women with preeclampsia who underwent caesarean section in 2020 at Sumber Waras Hospital, West Jakarta. The results of this study were the highest group 4 on the Robson criteria with 41.81%, while the lowest were groups 3, 6 and 9 with 1.81%. The conclusion of this study is that the prevalence of women giving birth with preeclampsia who undergo cesarean section at Sumber Waras Hospital, West Jakarta is 78.57% and shows that group 4 on Robson's criteria has the highest number.

Keywords: Cesarean section; Preeclampsia; Robson's criteria

Abstrak

Preeklampsia adalah hipertensi pada kehamilan yang berhubungan dengan 2-8% komplikasi terkait kehamilan di seluruh dunia. Ini menyebabkan 9-26% kematian ibu di negara-negara berpenghasilan rendah dan 16% di negara-negara berpenghasilan tinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui prevalensi serta karakteristik ibu bersalin dengan preeklampsia yang menjalani seksio sesarea berdasarkan kriteria Robson di RS Sumber Waras Jakarta Barat. Metodologi penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif dengan desain penelitian potong lintang dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 55 ibu bersalin dengan preeklampsia yang menjalani seksio sesarea pada tahun 2020 di RS Sumber Waras Jakarta Barat. Hasil penelitian ini yang tertinggi adalah kelompok 4 pada kriteria Robson dengan 41,81%, sedangkan yang terendah yaitu kelompok 3, 6 serta 9 dengan 1,81%. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah prevalensi ibu bersalin dengan preeklampsia yang menjalani seksio sesarea di RS Sumber Waras Jakarta Barat adalah 78,57% serta menunjukan bahwa kelompok 4 pada kriteria Robson memiliki jumlah yang paling tinggi.

Kata kunci: Kriteria Robson; Preeklampsia; Seksio sesarea


Keywords


Cesarean section; Preeclampsia; Robson's criteria

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Sung S, Mahdy H. Cesarean Section. 2021 Apr 25. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan–. PMID: 31536313. Available from : https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31536313/
  2. UNICEF. The State of the World’s Children 2013. New York: UNICEF, 2013. Available from : http://www.unicef.org/sowc2013/
  3. Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak A, Szymański JK, Ciebiera M, Sarecka-Hujar B, Jakiel G. Pediatrics Consequences of Caesarean Section-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 31;17(21):8031. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218031.Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33142727/
  4. Liu M, Xue M, Yang Q, et al. Association between migration status and caesarean section delivery based on a modified Robson classification in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 17;21(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03708-6. PMID: 33731060; PMCID: PMC7971954. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7971954/
  5. Betran, A. P., Vindevoghel, N., Souza, J. P., Gülmezoglu, A. M., Torloni, M. R. 2014. A Systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn’t work and how to improve it. PLoS ONE,9(6),e97769. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097769
  6. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Laporan Nasional Riset Kesehatan Dasar 2018 (Report of Indonesian Basic Health Survey 2018). Jakarta; 2018. Available from: https://ejournal2.litbang.kemkes.go.id/index.php/kespro/article/download/2046/1116
  7. Gedefaw G, Demis A, Alemnew B, Wondmieneh A, Getie A, Waltengus F. Prevalence, indications, and outcomes of caesarean section deliveries in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Saf Surg. 2020 Apr 7;14:11. doi: 10.1186/s13037-020-00236-8. PMID: 32292491; PMCID: PMC7140488.Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32292491/
  8. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (WHO/RHR/15.02). Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf
  9. Nakamura-Pereira, M., do Carmo Leal, M., Esteves-Pereira, A.P. et al. Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth. Reprod Health 13, 128 2016. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0228-7
    1. FIGO Working Group on Challenges in Care of Mothers and Infants during Labour and Delivery. Best practice advice on the 10-group classification system for cesarean deliveries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2016;135:232–3. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763379/
    2. Crequit S, Korb D, Morin C, Schmitz T, Sibony O. Use of the Robson classification to understand the increased risk of cesarean section in case of maternal obesity. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 26;20(1):738. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33243175/
    3. Correa Junior MD, Santos BMRTD, Roveda JRC, Silva LCMV, Guimarães LS, Gonçalves SCL. Improving the Management of High-Risk Pregnancies with the Use of the Robson Classification. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020 Aug;42(8):448-453. English. Epub 2020 Sep 8.Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32898911/
    4. Sanchez MP, Guida JP, Simões M, et al. Can pre-eclampsia explain higher cesarean rates in the different groups of Robson's classification? Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;152(3):339-344. Epub 2020 Sep 28. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32920856/
    5. Rana S, Lemoine E, Granger JP, Karumanchi SA. Preeclampsia: Pathophysiology, Challenges, and Perspectives. Circ Res. 2019 Mar 29;124(7):1094-1112. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30920918/
    6. Kemenkes RI. 2020. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2019. Available from: https://pusdatin.kemkes.go.id/resources/download/pusdatin/profil-kesehatan-indonesia/Profil-Kesehatan-indonesia-2019.pdf
    7. Harrison, M.S., Garces, A.L., Goudar, S.S. et al. Cesarean birth in the Global Network for Women’s and Children’s Health Research: trends in utilization, risk factors, and subgroups with high cesarean birth rates. Reprod Health 17, 165 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01021-
    8. Lamminpää R, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Gissler M, Heinonen S. Preeclampsia complicated by advanced maternal age: a registry-based study on primiparous women in Finland 1997-2008. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Jun 11;12:47. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22687260/
    9. Poon LC, Shennan A, Hyett JA, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 May;145 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-33. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31111484/
    10. Liu L, Hong Z, Zhang L. Associations of prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women delivering single live babies. Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 5;5:12863. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26242798/
    11. Murtaza K, Chaudhry M, Nazeer S, Malik S. Prevalence-pattern and risk factors of Cesarean section in a multiethnic cohort. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(3):711-715. doi:10.12669/pjms.37.3.3186. Available from : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8155449/
    12. Abubeker, F.A., Gashawbeza, B., Gebre, T.M. et al. Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20, 767 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03474-x
    13. Soares KB, Klein VCG, Lima JARF, Gadenz L, Paulo LE, Konopka CK. Gestational Risk as a Determining Factor for Cesarean Section according to the Robson Classification Groups. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2021 Feb;43(2):84-90. English. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718446. Epub 2021 Jan 19. PMID: 33465796.
    14. Paixao, E.S., Bottomley, C., Smeeth, L. et al. Using the Robson classification to assess caesarean section rates in Brazil: an observational study of more than 24 million births from 2011 to 2017. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 589 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04060-5



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkr.76694

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1833 | views : 1748

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi Indexed by:

 

 



SEKRETARIAT JURNAL KESEHATAN REPRODUKSI
Departemen Obstetri dan Ginekologi, FK-KMK, UGM/RS Dr. Sardjito
Jl. Kesehatan No. 1, Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta 55281
Tlp: (0274) 511329 / Faks: (0274) 544003
Email: jurnal.kesehatanreproduksi@ugm.ac.id
Cp: Dwi Astuti +6281802698043