Environmental Activism and Cyber-advocacy on Social Media: A Case Study from Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.67713

Nurhadi Susanto(1*), M.H. Thamrin(2)

(1) Department of Public Policy and Management, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
(2) Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Sriwijaya, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of the functions of social media for ENGOs (Environmental Non-Government Organization). Recently, ENGOs’ presence on social media caught public attention due to the emergence of several offline protests that were initiated online. The research used content analysis on tweets posted by two ENGOs in Indonesia. The results showed that social media was used primarily to build public awareness regarding environmental issues in Indonesia. In this case, ENGOs tries to educate the public on the causes and consequences of environmental problems. One of the issues highlighted is infrastructure development which is currently underway in Indonesia. While infrastructure development fosters long term development, the process has been associated with detrimental effects on the environment. This research also found that the public can act as a vital source of informationon environmental issues. Social media allow the public to connect virtual with the real world , thereby giving them the opportunity to participate in policy debates even in the absence of physical presence. That said, while social media is an important alternative channel for communicating positions and ideals, ENGOs still principally rely on mainstream media to reach a broader public, largely due to the digital divide that prevents certain people from active participation.

Keywords


ENGO; social media; public sphere; online activism; environmental activism

Full Text:

PDF


References

Bach, J., & Stark, D. (2004). Link, Search, Interact. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404043622

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020). Environment Statistcs of Indonesia: Water and Environment. Jakarta.

Bellström, P., Magnusson, M., Pettersson, & Sören, J. (2016). Facebook usage in a local government: A content analysis of page owner posts and user posts. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 10(4), 548–567. https://doi.org/doi:10.1108/TG-08-2013-0026

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action:Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661

Bohman, J. (2004). Expanding Dialogue: The Internet, the Public Sphere and Prospects for Transnational Democracy. The Sociological Review, 52(1_suppl), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00477.x

Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope : social movements in the Internet age. Cambridge: Polity. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Networks+of+Outrage+and+Hope%3A+Social+Movements+in+the+Internet+Age%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9780745695761

Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The Internet and Democratic Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818271

Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change : activism in the Internet age. MIT Press. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hhcb9

Fuchs, C. (2014). Social Media and the Public Sphere. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 12(1), 57–101. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v12i1.552

Gritten, D., & Kant, P. (2007). Assessing the impact of environmental campaigns against the activities of a pulp and paper company in Indonesia. International Forestry Review, 9(4), 819–834. https://doi.org/10.1505/ifor.9.4.819

Gurevitch, M., Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). Political Communication —Old and New Media Relationships. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 625(1), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716209339345

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: Polity.

Han, H. (2014). Policy Deliberation as a Goal: The Case of Chinese ENGO Activism. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 19(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-014-9288-0

Harlow, S. (2012). Social media and social movements: Facebook and an online Guatemalan justice movement that moved offline. New Media & Society, 14(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811410408

Hemmi, A., & Crowther, J. (2013). Learning environmental activism through social networking sites? Concept, 4(1), 7. Retrieved from http://concept.lib.ed.ac.uk/index.php/Concept/article/view/218

Hermida, A., & Hernández-Santaolalla, V. (2018). Twitter and video activism as tools for counter-surveillance: the case of social protests in Spain. Information Communication and Society, 21(3), 416–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1284880

Hindmarsh, R., & Luna, D. (2016). The Potential of New and Social Media for Environmental Activism, 55–69.

Hwang, H., & Kim, K.-O. (2015). Social media as a tool for social movements: the effect of social media use and social capital on intention to participate in social movements. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(5), 478–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12221

Jolley, C., & Rickards, L. (2020). Contesting coal and climate change using scale: emergent topologies in the Adani mine controversy. Geographical Research, 58(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12376

Karpus, C. (2018). Fifteen Minutes of Shame: Social Media and 21st Century Environmental Activism. Villanova Environmental Law Journal, 29(1), 101.

Katz-Kimchi, M., & Manosevitch, I. (2015). Mobilizing facebook users against facebook’s energy policy: The case of greenpeace unfriend coal campaign. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.993413

Kellow, A. (2000). Norms, interests and environment NGOs: The limits of cosmopolitanism. Environmental Politics, 9(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010008414535

Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis : an introduction to its methodology. SAGE. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Content_Analysis.html?id=s_yqFXnGgjQC&redir_esc=y

Kruse, L. M., Norris, D. R., & Flinchum, J. R. (2018). Social Media as a Public Sphere? Politics on Social Media. The Sociological Quarterly, 59(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143

Kurniawan, N. I., & Rye, S. A. (2014). Online environmental activism and Internet use in the Indonesian environmental movement. Information Development, 30(3), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666913485260

Leeder, K. (2007). Technology and Communication in the Environmental Movemen. Electronic Green Journal, 1(25), 1–8. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9gt4h74z

Loader, B. D. (2008). Social Movements and New Media. Sociology Compass, 2(6), 1920–1933. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00145.x

Luxon, E. M. (2019). Mobilizing environmental sentiment through the media. Environmental Politics, 28(4), 639–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1560743

McDonald, M. (2016). Bourdieu, environmental NGOs, and Australian climate politics. Environmental Politics, 25(6), 1058–1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1196968

Milan, S. (2015). From social movements to cloud protesting: the evolution of collective identity. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043135

Mundt, M., Ross, K., & Burnett, C. M. (2018). Scaling Social Movements Through Social Media: The Case of Black Lives Matter. Social Media + Society, 4(4), 205630511880791. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118807911

Murphy-Gregory, H. (2018). Governance via persuasion: environmental NGOs and the social licence to operate. Environmental Politics, 27(2), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1373429

Okura, S., & Kaigo, M. (2016). Who leads advocacy through social media in Japan? Evidence from the “Tsukuba Civic Activities Cyber-Square” facebook page. Information (Switzerland), 7(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/info7040066

Pickerill, J. (2003). Cyberprotest : Environmental activism online. Manchaster: Manchester University Press.

Polat, R. K. (2005). The Internet and Political Participation. European Journal of Communication, 20(4), 435–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105058251

Rokka, J., & Moisander, J. (2009). Environmental dialogue in online communities: negotiating ecological citizenship among global travellers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00759.x

Ross, K., & Bürger, T. (2014). Face to face(book): Social media, political campaigning and the unbearable lightness of being there. Political Science, 66(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032318714534106

Şen, A. F., & Şen, Y. F. (2016). Online environmental activism in Turkey: The case study of “The Right to Water.” Global Bioethics, 27(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2015.1137184

Stewart, M., & Schultze, U. (2019). Producing solidarity in social media activism: The case of My Stealthy Freedom. Information and Organization, (March), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.04.003

Xu, J., & Zhang, H. (2020). Environmental activism and big data: Building green social capital in China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12083386

Zhang, N., & Skoric, M. M. (2018). Media use and environmental engagement: Examining differential gains from news media and social media. International Journal of Communication, 12, 380–403.

Zhang, N., & Skoric, M. M. (2019). Making the news: environmental NGOs and their media visibility in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1610468



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.67713

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 4655 | views : 4301

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2021 JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.