Pengembangan Alat Evaluasi Fisika Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri Oenino
Laurensia Missa(1*), Ruth Novi Kornalia Mellu(2), Demeryati Langtang(3)
(1) Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Soe
(2) Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Soe
(3) Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Soe
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The objective of study was developing diagnostic test evaluation instrument in multiple choice form with predetermined reason to identify Grade VIII student’s misconceptions on force topic in SMPN Oenino. Population of the study covered all students whereas the samples were Grade VIII students SMPN Oenino. The research method was Research and Development (R&D) with potential and problem, gathering information, product design, product validation, product revision, and product trial. Validation phase included experts and content validation. On expert’s validation, test instrument was validated by 3 validators with 87,7% worthiness average and was recommended applicable without revision. On content validation, 45 test items were tried out to students and 17 items were declared valid ranging from C1 to C4 cognitive domain which were used later to identify student’s misconceptions. Their misconceptions on force material were 23%, 38%, 13% and 26% from C1 to C4 cognitive domains. The result indicated that this instrument was applicable to identify student’s misconception on force materials.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
- Annisak W and Pathoni H, “DESAIN PENGEMASAN TES DIAGNOSTIK MISKONSEPSI BERBASIS CBT ( Computer Based Test ) Kata Kunci : Miskonsepsi , CRI ( Certainty of Response Index ) , CBT .,” J. Edu Fis., vol. 02, no. 01, pp. 1–12, 2017.
- Nurulwati, A.Vello, and M. A. Ruslan, “Suatu tinjauan tentang jenis-jenis dan penyebab miskonsepsi Fisika,” J. Pendidik. Sains Indones., vol. 02, no. 01, pp. 87–95, 2014.
- DIREKTORAT JENDERAL MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN and PERTAMA, Tes Diagnostik. DEPARTEMEN PENDIDIKAN NASIONAL DIREKTORAT JENDERAL MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN DASAR DAN MENENGAH DIREKTORAT PEMBINAAN SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA, 2007.
- Widoyoko EP, Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2009.
- Wahyuningsih T, Raharjo T, and Masithoh DF, “Pembuatan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Fisika SMA Kelas XI,” J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 111–117, 2013.
- Susanti D, Waskito S, and Surantoro, “PENYUSUNAN INSTRUMEN TES DIAGNOSTIK MISKONSEPSI FISIKA SMA KELAS XI PADA MATERI USAHA DAN ENERGI,” J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 16–19, 2014.
- Setiawan D, “PENGEMBANGAN ASESMEN DIAGNOSTIK MISKONSEPSI FLUIDA BERFORMAT FIVE-TIER UNTUK MENGUNGKAP PROFIL PEMAHAMAN KONSEP SISWA,” UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SEMARANG, 2020.
- Jubaedah DS, Kaniawati I, Suyana I, Samsudin A, and Suhendi E, “PENGEMBANGAN TES DIAGNOSTIK BERFORMAT FOUR-TIER UNTUK MENGIDENTIFIKASI MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA TOPIK USAHA DAN ENERGI,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika, 2017, no. December, pp. 1–7.
- Nurhayati and W. Alsagaf SLH, “PENGEMBANGAN TES DIAGNOSTIK THREE-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICE UNTUK MENGUKUR KONSEPSI FISIKA SISWA SMA,” J. Pendidik., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 187–202, 2013.
- Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.
- Hasan S, Bagayoko D, “Misconceptions and the Certainty of Response Index ( CRI ),” 2014. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/34/5/304.
- Annisa R, Astuti B, and Mindyarto B.N, “Tes diagnostik four tier untuk identifikasi pemahaman dan miskonsepsi siswa pada materi gerak melingkar beraturan,” J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Keilmuan, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 25–32, 2019.
- Syahrul D.A, Setyarsih W, J. Fisika, F. Matematika, P. Alam, and U. N. Surabaya, “Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Siswa dengan Three-tier Diagnostic Test Pada Materi Dinamika Rotasi Dimas Adiansyah Syahrul , Woro Setyarsih,” J. Inov. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 04, no. 03, pp. 67–70, 2015.
- Shalihah A, Mulhayayiah D, and Alatas F, “IDENTIFIKASI MISKONSEPSI MENGGUNAKAN TES DIAGNOSTIK THREE- TIER PADA HUKUM NEWTON DAN PENERAPANNYA,” JoTaLP J. Teach. Learn. Phys., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 24–33, 2016.
- Rukmana D, “IDENTIFIKASI MISKONSEPSI PADA MATERI PRINSIP ARCHIMEDES DI SMK,” J. Wahana Pendidik. Fis., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 36–43, 2017.
- Sheftyawan W.B, Prihandono T, and Lesmono A.D, “Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa menggunakan four-tier diagnostic test pada materi optik geometri,” J. Pembelajaran Fis., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 147–153, 2014.
- Minarni, Kurniawan Y, and Muliyani R, “IDENTIFIKASI K UANTITAS S ISWA Y ANG M ISKONSEPSI P ADA M ATERI L ISTIK D INAMIS M ENGGUNAKAN T HREE T IER -T EST ( TTT ),” J. Ilmu Pendidik. Fis., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 38–41, 2018.
- Artiawati P.R, Muliyani R, Kurniawan Y, and Guess L, “IDENTIFIKASI K UANTITAS S ISWA YANG M ISKONSEPSI MENGGUNAKAN T HREE T IER -T EST P ADA M ATERI G ERAK L URUS B ERUBAH B ERATURAN ( GLBB ),” J. Ilmu Pendidik. Fis., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 5–7, 2018.
- Fenditasari K, Jumadi, Istiyono E, and Hendra, “Identification of misconceptions on heat and temperature among physics education students using four-tier diagnostic test Identification of misconceptions on heat and temperature among physics education students using four-tier diagnostic test,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012055.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jfi.v24i3.57639
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 3346 | views : 3573Refbacks
Copyright (c) 2020 Laurensia Missa, Ruth Novi Kornalia Mellu, Demeryati Langtang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.