Performance of NGA Models in Predicting Ground Motion Parameters of The Strong Earthquake

https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.46651

Lindung Zalbuin Mase(1*)

(1) Department of Civil Engineering, University of Bengkulu, Bengkulu, INDONESIA
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) West 1 and 2 models are employed to predict the ground motion parameters of strong earthquake during the 6.9 Mw Kobe Earthquake in 1995. This study is initiated by collecting the data of ground motion parameters of the earthquake. Furthermore, the ground motion prediction is performed by using the NGA models. There are three ground motion parameters observed, i.e. peak ground acceleration (PGA), spectral acceleration (SA) at 0.2 second and SA at 1 second. The performances of the models are evaluated by using the Residual Values and Root Mean Square (RMS) Error. The results show that the NGA models could predict the ground motion parameters quite appropriately. It can be seen from the correlation values of the observed and the predicted values, which is relatively consistent each other, especially for peak ground acceleration. In general, this study could recommend the procedure in selecting the attenuation model for strong earthquakes. The study framework could be implemented to predict the ground motion in other regions.

 


Keywords


Attenuation; Ground Motion; Earthquake; Statistical Parameters; Peak Ground Acceleration; Spectral Acceleration

Full Text:

PDF


References

Centre of Earthquake Strong Motion Data (CESMD) (2018) Earthquake Data of the 6.9 Mw 1995 Great Hansin Earthquake. Available at: https://www.strongmotioncenter.org (Accessed: 26 December 2018).

Google Earth (2018) Osaka-Kobe-Kyoto Region. Available at: http://www.google.com (Accessed: 21 December 2018).

National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program (NEHRP) (1998) Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulation for New Buildings and other Structures 1997 edition.

Abrahamson, N. A. and Bommer, J. J. (2005) ‘Probability and uncertainty in seismic hazard analysis’, Earthquake Spectra, 21(2), pp. 603–607. doi: 10.1193/1.1899158.

Abrahamson, N. A., Silva, W. J. and Kamai, R. (2014) ‘Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions’, Earthquake Spectra, 30(1), pp. 1025–1055. doi: 10.1193/070913EQS198M.

Abrahamson, N. and Silva, W. (2008) ‘Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA ground-motion relations’, Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), pp. 67–97. doi: 10.1193/1.2924360.

Atkinson, G. M. (2006) ‘Single-station sigma’, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96(2), pp. 446–455. doi: 10.1785/0120050137.

Boore, D. M. et al. (2014) ‘NGA-West2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes’, Earthquake Spectra, 30(3), pp. 1057–1085. doi: 10.1193/070113EQS184M.

Boore, D. M. and Atkinson, G. M. (2008) ‘Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s’, Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), pp. 99–138. doi: 10.1193/1.2830434.

Campbell, K. W. and Bozorgnia, Y. (2008) ‘NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s’, Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), pp. 139–171. doi: 10.1193/1.2857546.

Campbell, K. W. and Bozorgnia, Y. (2014) ‘NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra’, Earthquake Spectra, 30(3), pp. 1085–1115. doi: 10.1193/062913EQS175M.

Chiou, B. S. J. and Youngs, R. R. (2008) ‘An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra’, Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), pp. 173–215. doi: 10.1193/1.2894832.

Chiou, B. S. J. and Youngs, R. R. (2014) ‘Update of the Chiaou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra’, Earthquake Spectra, 30(3), pp. 1117–1153. doi: 10.1193/072813EQS219M.

Idriss, I. M. (2008) ‘An NGA Empirical Model for Estimating the Horizontal Spectral Values Generated By Shallow Crustal Earthquakes’, Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), pp. 217–242. doi: 10.1193/1.2924362.

Idrissa, I. M. (2014) ‘An NGA-West2 empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values generated by shallow crustal earthquakes’, Earthquake Spectra, 30(3), pp. 1155–1177. doi: 10.1193/070613EQS195M.

Katayama, T. (2004) ‘Earthquake disaster risk mitigation before and after the 1995 Kobe earthquake’, in 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.

Kramer, S. L. (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall.

Kusumahadi, Y., Soralump, S.& Prempramote, S. (2018) ‘Estimation of Liquefaction-Induced Building Settlement Due to 6.3 Mw Chiang Rai Earthquake 2014’, in Proceeeding of the 8th Regional Symposium on Infrastructure Development in Civil Engineering (RSID8).

Likitlersuang, S. et al. (2019) ‘Influence of spatial variability of ground on seismic response analysis: a case study of Bangkok subsoils’, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10064-019-01560-9.

Mase, L. Z. et al. (2018) ‘Local Site Investigation of Liquefied Soils Caused by Earthquake in Northern Thailand’, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 22(6), pp. 1–25. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2018.1469441.

Mase, L. Z. (2018) ‘Reliability study of spectral acceleration designs against earthquakes in Bengkulu City, Indonesia’, International Journal of Technology, 9(5), pp. 910–924. doi: 10.14716/ijtech.v9i5.621.

Mase, L. Z., Likitlersuang, S. and Tobita, T. (2018a) ‘Analysis of seismic ground response caused during strong earthquake in Northern Thailand’, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 114(11), pp. 113–126. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.006.

Mase, L. Z., Likitlersuang, S. and Tobita, T. (2018b) ‘Non-linear site response analysis of soil sites in northern Thailand during the Mw 6.8 tarlay Earthquake’, Engineering Journal, 22(3), pp. 291–303. doi: 10.4186/ej.2018.22.3.291.

Ornthammarath, T. (2013) ‘A note on the strong ground motion recorded during the Mw 6.8 earthquake in Myanmar on 24 March 2011’, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 11(1), pp. 241–254. doi: 10.1007/s10518-012-9385-4.

Ornthammarath, T. and Warnitchai, P. (2016) ‘5 May 2014 MW 6.1 Mae Lao (Northern Thailand) earthquake: Interpretations of recorded ground motion and structural damage’, Earthquake Spectra, 32(3), pp. 1209–1238. doi: 10.1193/081814EQS129M.

Rhoades, D.A. & Dowrick, D. J. (2000) ‘Effects of Magnitude Uncertainties on Seismic Hazard Estimates’, in Proceeding of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Auckland.

Shahi, S. K. and Baker, J. W. (2014) ‘NGA-West2 models for ground motion directionality’, Earthquake Spectra, 30(3), pp. 1285–1300. doi: 10.1193/040913EQS097M.

Shoja-Taheri, J., Naserieh, S. and Hadi, G. (2010) ‘A test of the applicability of NGA models to the strong ground-motion data in the Iranian plateau’, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 14(2), pp. 278–292. doi: 10.1080/13632460903086051.

Soga, K. (1998) ‘Soil liquefaction effects observed in the kobe earthquake of 1995’, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Geotechnical Engineering, 131(1), pp. 34–51. doi: 10.1680/igeng.1998.30004.

Tamura, K. (2014) ‘Seismic design of highway bridge foundations with the effects of liquefaction since the 1995 Kobe earthquake’, Soils and Foundations, 54(4), pp. 874–882. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2014.06.017.

Wakamatsu, K. and Numata, A. (2014) ‘The Effect of Liquefaction Susceptibility on Building Damage During the 1995 Kobe Earthquake’, in Proceeding of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.46651

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 3334 | views : 2532

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s)


The content of this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ISSN 5249-5925 (online) | ISSN 2581-1037 (print)
Jl. Grafika No.2 Kampus UGM, Yogyakarta 55281
Email : jcef.ft@ugm.ac.id
Web Analytics JCEF Stats