DIFFERENT WAYS OF CALCULATING CATCHMENT RAINFALL: CASES IN INDONESIA

https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.18944

F. Balany(1*)

(1) Civil Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty Haluoleo University, Kendari, South East Sulawesi
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Uncertainty in obtaining average catchment rainfall remains a basic question to which commonly (almost) nobody has any attention in the design of waterworks. Little attention is given to the influence of the applied method on the final design values. Applying Thiessen polygon for almost every effort of obtaining catchment average is still questionable since there are two other methods which are also often used. Up to now, there is no reliable information to which method is the best among the three most commonly applied methods. This study explores the behavior of the three methods of obtaining catchment rainfall, which are mean arithmetic, Thiessen polygon and isohyetal method. The accuracy is obtained by comparing the calculated design values computed by Unit Hydrograph and those obtained by frequency analysis of recorded discharge. The result says that no methods consistently superior.

Full Text:

PDF



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.18944

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1393 | views : 5635

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s)


The content of this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ISSN 5249-5925 (online) | ISSN 2581-1037 (print)
Jl. Grafika No.2 Kampus UGM, Yogyakarta 55281
Email : jcef.ft@ugm.ac.id
Web Analytics JCEF Stats