_.png){kind=logo}
* Corresponding Author
Transitional Production of Knowledge For Civic Trust and Social Integration: Social Science in the Transitional Justice Process
https://doi.org/10.22146/ikat.v2i2.40231 Katarzyna Marta Głąb(1*)
(1) SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Warsaw
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This article aims to show that transitional justice should be understood extensively, going beyond the legal-criminal view (transitional justice in the narrow sense). The main argument of research is that social sciences offer a prepared methodological set, without which it is impossible to study these processes effectively, and thus it is impossible to carry out effective social reform, what the cases of some countries show. More andmore often, this is said about the significant role of reconciliation, buildingsocial trust and social cohesion, achieved through extra-legal means, using non-judicial mechanisms. The author intentions to highlight the rooting of transitional justice in this broader sense in social sciences and outline the relationship between truth and political regimes, explaining the dynamic relation of truth-knowledge to political power, but also to highlight the issue of overcoming the problematic universality of transitional justice.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alexander, J. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Alvarez-Nakagawa, A., (2018). Law, Justice, Time: A Critique of Transitional Justice from Walter Benjamin’s Politics of Time. In K. D. Karatzas (Ed.). Time, Space and Mobility. 65-71. Warsaw:
Interdisciplinary Research Foundation.
Anderson, L. (2003). Pursuing Truth, Exercising Power. Social Science
and Public Policy in the Twenty-first Century. New York: Columbia
University Press.
Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition, Second Edition. Chicago: The
University of Chicago Press.
Bachmann, K. (2011). Paradoxes of Retribution. What Central European
Experiences tell about Transitional Justice in Arab Countries. Center for International Relations in cooperation with the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in Poland.
Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The Human Consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bräuchler, B. (2015). The Cultural Dimension of Peace. Decentralization and Reconciliation in Indonesia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brewer, J. D. (2010). Peace processes: a sociological approach. Cambridge: Polity.
Brewer, J. D., & Hayes, B. C. (2011b). Victims as moral beacons: victims and perpetrators in Northern Ireland. Contemporary Social Science, 6:1, 73-88, DOI:10.1080/17450144.2010.534494.
Brewer, J., & Hayes, B. C. (2011a). Post-conflict societies and the socialsciences: a review. Contemporary Social Science, 6:1, 5-18, DOI: 10.1080/17450144.2010.534497.
Brudholm, T. (2008). Resentment’s Virtue: Jean Améry and the Refusal to Forgive. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Chapman, A.R. (2009). Truth Finding in the Transitional Justice Process. In H. van der Merwe, V. Baxter, & A. R. Chapman (Eds.). Assessing the Impact of Transitional Justice. Challenges for Empirical Research. 91-11. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.
Czarnota, A. (2003). Radykalne zło a prawo. Jak mierzyć się z trudną przeszłością? Ius et Lex, Vol. II. 351-363.
Derrida, J. (1995). Archive Fever. A Freudian Impression. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Duthie, R., (2009). Introduction. In P. de Greiff & R. Duthie (Eds.).Transitional Justice And Development. Making Connections. 17-27. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. Social Science Research Council.
Eser, A., Arnold, J. & Kreicker, H. (2001). Criminal Law in Reaction to State Crime Comparative Insights into Transitional Processes. A Project Report. Freiburg im Breisgau: Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Strafrecht.
Foucault, M. (2014). On the Government of the Living. Lectures at the Collège De France 1979–1980. M. Senellart (Ed.), New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
__________. (1981). The Order of Discourse. Trans. I. McLeod. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader. 48-78. London: Routledge.
__________. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse On Language. New York: Pantheon Books.
Govier, T. (2010). A Practical Study of Argument (7th Edition). Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
__________. (1997). Social Trust and Human Communities. Montreal &Kingston - London – Buffalo: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Gready, P., Robins, S. (2017). Rethinking civil society and transitional justice: lessons from social movements and ‘new’ civil society, The International Journal of Human Rights, 21:7, 956- 975, DOI: 10.1080/13642987.2017.1313237.
Hamber, B. (2009). Transforming Societies after Political Violence Truth, Reconciliation, and Mental Health. Dordrecht-Heidelberg-London- New York: Springer.
Hayes, B. C., & McAllister, I. (2001). Sowing Dragon’s Teeth: Public Support for Political Violence and Paramilitarism in Northern Ireland. Political Studies, 49(5), 901–922. DOI:10.1111/1467- 9248.00346.
Hayner, P. B. (2010). Unspeakable Truths. Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions (Second Edition). New York & London: Routledge.
__________. (2001). Unspeakable Truths. Confronting State Terror and Atrocity. New York & London: Routledge.
Hirsch, M., & Spitzer, L. (2010). Ghosts of Home. The Afterlife of Czernowitz in Jewish Memory. London: University California Press.
International Center for Transitional Justice, What is Transitional Justice? Retrieved from https://www.ictj.org/about/transitional- justice.
Justenhofen, H-G. (2008). Individuelle und kollektive Versöhnung. Die Neue Ordnung, 2, 84-93.
Kagoro, B. (2012). The Paradox of Alien Knowledge, Narrative and Praxis: Transitional Justice and the Politics of Agenda Setting in Africa. In M. Chrispus Okello et al. (Eds.). Where Law Meets Reality: Forging African Transitional Justice. 4-52. Cape Town: Pambazuka.
Lachowski, T. (2018). Perspektywa praw ofiar w prawie międzynarodowym. Sprawiedliwość okresu przejściowego (transitional justice). Lodz: Lodz University Press.
Lamb, S., & Murphy, J. G. (Eds.). (2002). Before Forgiving: Cautionary Views of Forgiveness in Psychotherapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lederach, J. P. (2005). The moral imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morris-Suzuki, T. (2005). The Past Within Us: Media, Memory, History. London-New York: Verso.
Neier, A. (1995). What Should Be Done about the Guilty? In N. J. Kritz (Ed.), Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes. 172-183.. Volume I: General Considerations. Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press.
Olick, J. K., Vinitzky-Seroussi, V., & Levy, D. (Eds.). (2011). The Collective Memory Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Proclamation of 24 March as the International Day for the Right to the Truth concerning Gross Human Rights Violations and for the Dignity of Victims. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 21 December 2010, UN General Assembly, A/RES/65/196.
Sztompka, P. (2004). The Trauma of Social Change. A Case of Postcommunist Societies. In J. C. Alexander, N. J. Smelser, P. Sztompka, R. Eyerman, & B. Giesen. Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity (pp. 155-195). Berkeley – Los Angeles – London: University of California Press.
Teitel, R. (2000). Transitional Justice. Oxford - New York: Oxford University Press.
The rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflictsocieties. (2004). Report of the Secretary-General. UN Security Council. UN Doc S/2004/616.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ikat.v2i2.40231
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 2311
| 
views : 1729
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Katarzyna Marta Głąb
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.