Properti Psikometri Reflective Function Questionnaire For Youth Versi Indonesia

Annisa Hasna Faadhilah; Airin Triwahyuni

doi:10.22146/gamajpp.76762

Properti Psikometri Reflective Function Questionnaire For Youth Versi Indonesia

Annisa Hasna Faadhilah, Airin Triwahyuni

(Submitted 1 August 2022)

(Published 31 May 2023)

Abstract

Reflective Function berperan penting dalam perkembangan remaja untuk mencapai otonomi, identitas diri yang stabil dan regulasi yang adaptif. Namun, belum ada instrumen yang dapat mengukur konstruk tersebut pada remaja di Indonesia. Maka, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi properti psikometri instrumen Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youth (RFQY-5) yang diadaptasi untuk mengukur intensitas kemampuan reflective function pada remaja di Indonesia. Prosedur adaptasi menggunakan ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests. Dengan convenience sampling, sejumlah 320 partisipan berumur 13-20 tahun menyelesaikan kuesioner secara online. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa RFQY-5 memiliki koefisien reliabilitas yang baik (α = .707) dan dapat membedakan tinggi rendahnya partisipan. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) digunakan untuk menguji model RFQY-5. Hasil kriteria fit indexes sebagai konstruk unidimensional memiliki kecocokan dengan data penelitian (𝜒2= .198, RMSEA = .038, SRMR = .027, CFI = .992, dan TLI = .984). Kelima item memiliki factor loading yang baik. Bukti validitas berdasarkan hubungan dengan variabel lain menunjukkan korelasi positif yang signifikan dengan Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (r = .511, p < 0.01). Maka dari itu, RFQY-5 versi Indonesia menjadi alat ukur yang sesuai untuk mengukur reflective function pada remaja di Indonesia.

Keywords

adaptasi; Indonesia; reflective function; reliabilitas; validitas

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.22146/gamajpp.76762

References

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Badoud, D., Luyten, P., Fonseca-Pedrero, E., Eliez, S., Fonagy, P., & Debbané, M. (2015). The French version of the reflective functioning questionnaire: Validity data for adolescents and adults and its association with non-suicidal self-injury. PLoS ONE, 10(12), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145892

Bizzi, F., Riva, A., Borelli, J. L., Charpentier-Mora, S., Bomba, M., Cavanna, D., & Nacinovich, R. (2022). The Italian version of the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire: Validity within a sample of adolescents and associations with psychological problems and alexithymia. Journal of clinical psychology, 78(4), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23218

Both, L. M., Benetti, S. P. da C., & Goodman, G. (2019). Reflective function and identity in adolescents with clinical and nonclinical symptoms. Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 41(2), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0067

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications. https://www.guilford.com/books/Confirmatory-Factor-Analysis-for-Applied-Research/Timothy-Brown/9781462515363

Cardinet, J. (1975). International Test Commission: Translating and Adapting Tests (2nd ed.). IAAP. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1975.tb00322.x

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

Creswell, J. W. (2010). Educational Research : Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 4th Edition. Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2092(06)63677-6

Crocker L. M. & Algina J. (2008). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Cengage Learning. https://www.worldcat.org/title/introduction-to-classical-and-modern-test-theory/oclc/268675245

Cropp, C., Alexandrowicz, R. W., & Taubner, S. (2019). Reflective functioning in an adolescent community sample. Mental Health and Prevention, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mph.2019.200156

Davidsen, A. S., & Fosgerau, C. F. (2015). Grasping the process of implicit mentalization. Theory & Psychology, 25(4), 434–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315580605

Duval, J., Ensink, K., Normandin, L., Sharp, C., & Fonagy, P. (2018). Measuring Reflective Functioning in Adolescents: Relations to Personality Disorders and Psychological Difficulties. Adolescent Psychiatry, 8(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.2174/2210676608666180208161619

Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1986). Essentials of educational measurement. Journal of School Psychology, 11(2), 172-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(73)90057-5

Fernando, M. L., & Fajrianthi, F. (2019). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Emosional Dan Perceived Organization Support Terhadap Resistance To Change Dengan Psychology Capital Sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Jurnal Ecopsy, 6(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.20527/ecopsy.v6i1.5848

Fonagy, P., & Bateman, A. W. (2007). Mentalizing and borderline personality disorder. Journal of Mental Health, 16(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230601182045

Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. L., & Target, M. (2002). Affect Regulation, Mentalization and the Development of the Sel. Affect Regulation, Mentalization and the Development of the Self. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429471643

Fonagy, P., & Luyten, P. (2009). A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 21(4), 1355–1381. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409990198

Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., & Allison, E. (2015). Epistemic petrification and the restoration of epistemic trust: A new conceptualization of borderline personality disorder and its psychosocial treatment. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29(5), 575–609. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2015.29.5.575

Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., Moulton-Perkins, A., Lee, Y. W., Warren, F., Howard, S., Ghinai, R., Fearon, P., & Lowyck, B. (2016). Development and validation of a self-report measure of mentalizing: The reflective functioning questionnaire. PLoS ONE, 11(7), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158678

Fonagy, P., Speranza, M., Luyten, P., Kaess, M., Hessels, C., & Bohus, M. (2015). ESCAP Expert Article: Borderline personality disorder in adolescence: An expert research review with implications for clinical practice. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 24(11), 1307–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-015-0751-z

Fonagy, P., Steele, M., Steele, H., Higgitt, A., & Target, M. (1994). The Emanuel Miller Memorial Lecture: The theory and practice of resilience. Journal Child Psychology, 36(07). https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.36-4034

Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1997). Attachment and Reflective Function: Their Role in Self-Organization. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 23–64. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429471643-3

Gambin, M., Woźniak-Prus, M., Konecka, A., & Sharp, C. (2021). Relations between attachment to mother and father, mentalizing abilities and emotion regulation in adolescents. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2020.1736030

Griva, F., Pomini, V., Gournellis, R., Doumos, G., Thomakos, P., & Vaslamatzis, G. (2020). Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Greek version of Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. Psychiatrike, 31(3), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2020.313.216

Ha, C., Sharp, C., Ensink, K., Fonagy, P., & Cirino, P. (2013). The measurement of reflective function in adolescents withand without borderline traits. Journal of Adolescence, 36(6), 1215–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.09.008

Hair Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed). Pearson. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12123016

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D79B73

Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2013). Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications, and Issues (8th ed). Belmont: Wadsworth.

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practices of structural equation modelling 4th edition. In Methodology in the social sciences. The Guilford Press.

Levy, K. N., Meehan, K. B., Kelly, K. M., Reynoso, J. S., Weber, M., Clarkin, J. F., & Kernberg, O. F. (2006). Change in attachment patterns and reflective function in a randomized control trial of transference-focused psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(6), 1027–1040. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.6.1027

Lund, S. H., Bo, S., Bach, B., Jørgensen, M. S., & Simonsen, E. (2022). Mentalizing in Adolescents With and Without Prominent Borderline Features: Validation of the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire for Youths (RFQY) and an Investigation of the Factor Structure of Hypo- and Hypermentalizing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2022.2055474

Luyten, P., Fonagy, P., Lowyck, B., & Vermote, R. (2012). Handbook of Mentalizing in Mental Health Practice, Second Edition. Journal of Psychiatric Practice (Vol. 26, Issue 2, pp. 160–161). https://doi.org/10.1097/pra.0000000000000454

MacIntosh, H. B. (2019). Development Couple Therapy for Complex Trauma: A Manual for Therapists. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315210940

Müller, S., Wendt, L., Spitzer, C., Masuhr, O., Back, S. & Zimmermann. (2022). A Critical Evaluation of the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ). Journal of Personality Assessment, 104:5, 613-627, DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1981346

Öner, S. (2010). Children as intentional agents - The contribution of sensitive caregiving on the way to the development of theory of mind. Journal of European Psychology Students, 2, 3. https://doi.org/10.5334/jeps.al

Peterson, C. H., Peterson, N. A., & Powell, K. G. (2017). Cognitive interviewing for item development: Validity evidence based on content and response processes. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50(4), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1339564

Schmidt, N. A., & Brown, J. M. (2019). Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses: Appraisal and Application of Research: Appraisal and Application of Research

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.