Program “SUPER” untuk Meningkatkan Komitmen Perkawinan

Alfi Fatima Yudani; Tina Afiatin

doi:10.22146/gamajpp.45345

Program “SUPER” untuk Meningkatkan Komitmen Perkawinan

Alfi Fatima Yudani, Tina Afiatin

(Submitted 24 April 2019)

(Published 1 June 2018)

Abstract

Low marital commitments can cause many marital problems. Therefore, interventions that can increase marriage commitments are needed. This study aims to determine the effect of the "SUPER" Program in increasing marital commitment. The "SUPER" program is an intervention based on the techniques of creating gratitude according to the stages in the experiential learning cycle and implemented in four sessions. This quasi-experimental study was conducted with untreated control group design with pretest and posttest in 12 women who have been married for 1 to 10 years. The result of the difference of gained score analysis in the experimental group and control group with Mann-Whitney U test showed Z score = -2.089 p = 0,037 (p <0,05). The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test was performed on the experimental group showed Z score = -1,997 p = 0.046 (p <0.05). The results showed that there were significant differences between the experimental group compared with the control group. There was a significant increase in the marital commitment score between the pretest and posttest experimental groups

Keywords

gratitude; marital commitment; program “SUPER”

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.22146/gamajpp.45345

References

Adams, J. M., & Spain, J. S. (1999). The Dynamics of Interpersonal Commitment and the Issue of Salience. In J. M. Adams & W. H. Jones (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

Algoe, S. B. (2012). Find, remind, and bind: The functions of gratitude in everyday relationships. Social and Personality PSychology Compass, 6(6), 455–469. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00439.x

Algoe, S. B., Gable, S. L., & Maisel, N. C. (2010). It’s the little things: Everyday gratitude as a booster shot for romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 17, 217–233.

Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 650–666. doi: 10.1111/j. 1741-3737.2010.00723.x

Arriaga, X. B., Agnew, C. R., (2001). Being committed: Affective, Cognitive, and conative components of relationship commitment. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 27(9), 1190-1203. doi: 10.1177/0146167201279011

Asoodeh, M. H., Khalili, S., Daneshpour, M., & Lavasani, M. G. (2010). Factors of successful marriage: Accounts from self described happy couples. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 2042–2046. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.410

Barnhill, L. R., & Longo, D. (1978). Fixation and regression in the family life cycle. Family Process, 17(4), 469–478. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1978.00469.x

Barton, A. W. (2016). Protecting marriages from stress. Retrieved from https://ifstudies.org/blog/protecting-marriages-from-stress

Barton, A. W., Futris, T. G., & Nielsen, R. B. (2015). Linking financial distress to marital quality: The intermediary roles of demand/withdraw and spousal gratitude expressions. Personal Relationships, 22, 536–549. doi: 10.1111/pere.12094

Emmons, R. A. (2007). Thanks! : How the new science of gratitude can make you happier. Boston : Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Emmons, R. A., & Stern, R. (2013). Gratitude as a Psychotherapeutic Intervention. Journal of Clinical Psychologgy, 69(8), 846–855. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22020

Goldenberg, I., & Goldenberg, H. (2013). Family therapy : An overview (8th ed.). California: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.

Hiekel, N., & Keizer, R. (2015). Risk-avoidance or utmost commitment? Dutch focus group research on cohabitation and marriage. Demographic Research, 32(10), 311–340. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.10

Joel, S., Gordon, A. M., Impett, E. A., MacDonald, G., & Keltner, D. (2013). The things you do for me. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(10), 1333–1345. doi: 10.1177/01461672134 97801

Knox, D., & Schacht, C. (2010). Choices in relationships : An introduction to marriage and the family. Wadsworth. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books/ about/Choices_in_Relationships_An_Introduction.html?id=x8NT2lMAcJwC&redir_esc=y L

Listiyandini, R.A, Nathania, A., Syahniar, D., Sonia, L., & Nadya, R. (2015). Mengukur rasa syukur: Pengembangan model awal skala bersyukur versi Indonesia. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 2(2), 473-496

Mitchell, R. A. (2010). Thankful couples: Examining gratitude and marital happiness at the dyadic level. University of North Caroline Wilmington. Retrieved from http://dl.uncw.edu/etd/2010-1/mitchellr/robynmitchell.pdf

Murray, A. J., & Hazelwood, Z. J. (2015). Being grateful : Does it bring us closer ? Gratitude, attachment and intimacy in romantic relationships. Journal of Relationships Research, 2(1). 17–25. doi: 10.1375/jrr.2.1.17

Olson, D., DeFrain, J., & Skogrand, L. (2013). Marriages and families: Intimacy, diversity, and strengths. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Parnell, K. J. (2015). The influence of a couple gratitude intervention on emotions, intimacy, and satisfaction in the relationship. Disertasi. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.

Prianto, B., Wulandari, N. W., & Rahmawati. A. (2013). Rendahnya komitmen dalam perkawinan sebagai sebab perceraian. Jurnal Komunitas, 5(2), 208-2018.

Sheras, P. L., & Koch-Sheras, P. R. (2006). Couple power therapy : building commitment, cooperation, communication, and community in relationships. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/books/ 4317074.aspx

Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54(3), 595-608. doi: 10.2307/353245

Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., & Whitton, S. W. (2002). Communication, conflict, and commitment: Insights on the foundations of relationship success from a national survey. Family Process, 41(4), 659–675. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.00659.x

Weiten, W., Dunn, D. S., & Hammer, E. Y. (2015). Psychology applied to modern life adustment in the 21st century. Stanford: Cengage Learning.

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.