Counterfeit Purchase Intention of Fashion Brands: The Personal Values and Social Aspect of Consumers as Determinants

iin mayasari, Handrix Chris Haryanto, Iyus Wiadi, Adrian Azhar Wijanarko, Willy Abdillah
(Submitted 4 March 2020)
(Published 12 January 2022)

Abstract


Counterfeiting has become a growth industry in Indonesia. Consumers in Indonesia tend to find counterfeit products very easily, especially fashion products. The aim of this quantitative study is to analyze personal values and social factors toward counterfeit items and the intention to purchase counterfeit goods in Indonesia, with a focus on fashion products. The study also aims at analyzing the influence of novelty seeking, integrity values, and status consumption on people’s attitudes toward counterfeit goods. Furthermore, this study also addresses the influence of perceived risk, information susceptibility, physical vanity, and vanity-achievement on the intention to purchase counterfeit products. One hundred and ninety-three respondents were included in our study after survey questionnaires had been distributed in Indonesia. The respondents were 19 to 44 years old, living in Jakarta, Tangerang, Bogor, Bekasi, Yogyakarta, Bandung, Medan, Jambi, Batam, Pekanbaru and Samarinda, all of which are larger cities in Indonesia. Data were analyzed using partial least squares. The results of the study showed that the attitude toward counterfeit items was the most important factor in the willingness to purchase counterfeit goods. Novelty seeking, integrity, status consumption, and information susceptibility were also important determinants of people’s attitudes toward counterfeit products. Perceived risk, physical vanity, and achievement vanity were found to have an insignificant relationship with the intention to purchase counterfeit products .  This study also has an impact on marketing strategies. One of them is marketers can offer very prestigious brands to reduce the trade in counterfeit luxury brands.


Keywords


consumer behavior, counterfeits, personal values, social factor, purchase intention, Indonesia

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.22146/gamaijb.54660

References


Abdullah, Q. A., & Yu, J. (2019). Attitudes and purchase intention towards counterfeiting luxu- rious fashion products among yemeni students in China. American Journal of Economics, 9 (2), 53-64.

Abraham, J., Takwin, B., & Suleeman, J. (2018). Counterfeit self: A confirmatory factor analysis among Indonesians. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39 (3), 518-525.

Agarwal, S., & Panwar, S. (2016). Consumer orientation towards counterfeit fashion products: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Brand Management, 13 (3), 1-21.

Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs,NJ.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Pro- cesses, 50 (2), 179-211.

Albers-Miller, N. D. (1999). Consumer misbehavior: Why people buy illicit goods?”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16 (3), 273-287.

Allameh, S. M., Pool, J. K., Jaberi, A., Salehzadeh, R. & Asadi, H. (2015). Factors influencing sport tourists’ revisit intentions: the role and effect of destination image, perceived qual- ity, perceived value and satisfaction. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 27 (2), 191-207.

Ang, S. W., Cheng, P. S., Lim, E. A. C., & Tambyah, S. K. (2001). Spot the difference: Consumer responses towards counterfeit. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18 (3), 219-235.

Apeagyei, P. R. (2011). The impact of image on emerging consumers of fashion. International Journal of Management Cases, 13 (4), 242-251.

Baghi, I., Gabrielli, V., & Grappi, S. (2016). Consumers’ awareness of luxury brand counterfeits and their subsequent responses: When a threat becomes an opportunity for the genuine brand. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 25 (5), 452–464.

Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Teel, J. E. (1989). Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (4), 473-481.

Bian, X. & Moutinho, L. (2011). The role of brand image, product involvement, and knowledge in explaining consumer purchase behaviour of counterfeits: Direct and indirect effects. European Journal of Marketing, 45 (1/2), 191-216.

Budiman, S. (2012). Analysis of consumer attitudes to purchase intentions of counterfeiting bag product in Indonesia. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 1 (1), 1–12.

Chaudhry, P. E., & Stumpf, S. A. (2011). Consumer complicity with counterfeit products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28 (2), pp. 139–151.

Chaudhry, P. E., & Walsh, M. G. (1996). An assessment of the impact of counterfeiting in inter- national markets: The piracy paradox persists. The Columbia Journal of World Business, 31 (3), 34–48.

Cheah, I., Phau, I., Chong, C. & Shimul, A. (2015). Antecedents and outcomes of brand promi- nence on willingness to buy luxury brands. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 19 (4), 402-415.

Chen, J., Teng, L., & Liao, Y. (2018). “Counterfeit luxuries: Does moral reasoning strategy in- fluence consumers’ pursuit of counterfeits?” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 151, pp.249–264.

Cheung, W. L., & Prendergast, G. (2006). Buyers' perceptions of pirated products in China. Mar- keting Intelligence & Planning, 24 (5), 446-462.

Chew, S. S., & Leng, H. K. (2014). Marketing sports products on Facebook: the effect of social influence. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 61 (1), 65-73.

Chiu, W., Lee, K. Y., & Won, D. (2014). Consumer behavior toward counterfeit sporting goods. Social Behavior and Personality, 42 (4), 615-624.

Chiu, W., & Leng, H. K. (2016). Consumers’ intention to purchase counterfeit sporting goods in Singapore and Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 28 (1), 23-36.

Cordell, V. V., Wongtada, N., & Kieschnick, R. L. Jr. (1996). Counterfeit purchase intentions: role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants. Journal of Business Research, 35 (1), 41-53.

d'Astous, A., & Gargouri, E. (2001). Consumer evaluations of brand imitations. EuropeanJournal of Marketing, 35 (1), 153-167.

de Matos, C. A., Ituassu, C. T., & Rossi, C. A. V. (2007). Consumer attitudes toward counterfeits: A review and extension. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24 (1), 36–47.

Douglas, S. P. & Craig, S. C. (2012). The limits of global branding: the emerging market chal- lenge. In Jain, S.C. and David, G. (Eds), Handbook on Research in International Marketing, 2nd ed. Edward Elgar Publishing, North Hampton, MA, pp. 3-19.

Eastman, J. K., Goldsmith, R. E., & Flynn, L. R. (1999). Status consumption in consumer behav- ior: scale development and validation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7 (3), 41-52. Eisend, M. (2019). Morality effects and consumer responses to counterfeit and pirated products: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 154, 301–323.

Fernandes, C. (2013). Analysis of counterfeit fashion purchase behaviour in UAE. Journal of Fashion Marketing & Management, 17 (1), 85-97.

Fraj, E., & Martínez, E. (2006). Environmental values and lifestyles as determining factors of ecological consumer behaviour: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23 (3), 133-144.

Frank, F., & Watchravesringkan, K. (2016). Exploring antecedents and consequences of young consumers’ perceived global brand equity. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 25 (2), 160–170.

Hair, J. F. Jr., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sartedt, M. (2013). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

He, Y., Zou, D., & Jin, L. (2010). Exploiting the goldmine: A lifestyle analysis of affluent Chinese consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7 (7), 615–628.

Hennigs, N., Wiedmann, K. P., Klarmann,C. & Behrens, S. (2015). The complexity of value in the luxury industry: From consumers’ individual value perception to luxury consump- tion. International. Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43 (10), 922-939.

Hirschman, E. C. (1980). Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (3), 283-295.

Hirschman, E. C. (1990). Secular immortality and the American ideology of affluence. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 31-42.

Hoe, L., Hogg, G., & Hart, S. (2003). Fakin’ it: Counterfeiting and consumer contradictions. In Turley, D. and Brown, S. (Eds).European Advances in Consumer Research, 6th ed., Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT, pp. 60-67.

Jain, V., Roy, S., & Ranchhod, A. (2015). Conceptualizing luxury buying behavior: The Indian perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24 (3), 211–228.

Jee, T. W., & Ernest, C. R. (2013). Consumers’ personal values and sales promotion preferences effect on behavioural intention and purchase satisfaction for consumer product. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 25 (1), 70-101

Jiang, L., & Cova, V. (2012). Investigation into Chinese consumers’ interpersonal and personal aspects of counterfeit luxury branded products consumption. 28th International Congress of the French Association of Marketing (AFM), Brest, 9-11 May 2012.

Khare, A., Mishra, A., Parveen, C., & Srivastava, R. (2011). Influence of consumers’ suscepti- bility to interpersonal influence, collective self-esteem and age on fashion clothing in- volvement: A study on Indian consumers. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 19, (4), 227–242

Kim, J. E., & Johnson, K. K. P. (2014). Shame or pride? The moderating role of self-construal on moral judgments concerning fashion counterfeits. European Journal of Marketing, 48 (7), 1431-1450.

Kim, H., & Karpova, E. (2010). Consumer attitudes toward fashion counterfeits: Application of the theory of planned behaviour. Clothing & Textile Research Journal, 28(2), 79-94.

Koksal, M. H. (2014). Psychological and behavioural drivers of male fashion leadership. Asia

Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 26 (3), 430-449.

Lachance, M. J., Beaudoin, P., & Robitaille, J. (2003). Adolescents’ brand sensitivity in apparel: Influence of three socialization agents. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27 (1), 47-57. Lan, M. Y., Liu, F., Fang, C. H., & Lin, T. M. Y. (2012). Understanding word-of-mouth in counterfeiting. Psychology, 3 (3), 289-295.

Liao,C. H., & Hsieh, I-Yu. (2013). Determinants of consumer’s willingness to purchase gray market smartphones. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 409–424.

Lu, J., & Xu, J. (2015). Chinese young consumers’ brand loyalty toward sportswear products: A perspective of self-congruity. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 24 (4), 365-376.

Mamat, M., Noor, N., & Noor, N. (2016). Purchase intentions of foreign luxury brand handbags among consumers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 206-215.

Manchiraju, S., & Sadachar, A. (2014). Personal values and ethical fashion consumption. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 18 (3), 357-374.

Mandel, N. (2003). Shifting selves and decision making: The effects of self-construal priming on consumer risk-taking. Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (1), 30-40.

Martinez, L. F., & Jaeger, D. S. (2016). Ethical decision making in counterfeit purchase situations: The influence of moral awareness and moral emotions on moral judgment and purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33 (3), 213–223.

Mayasari, I., & Wiadi, I. (2017). Purchasing massive prestige brands: The exploration of con- sumers’ value perceptions. Asean Marketing Journal, IX (1), 1-17.

McGuire, W. J. (1968). Personality and susceptibility to social influences. In: E. F. Borgatta and W.W. Lambert (eds.) Handbook of Personality Theory and Research. Chicago, IL: Rand Mc- Nally, pp. 1130-1187.

Michaelidou, N., & Christodoulides, G. (2011). Antecedents of attitude and intention towards counterfeit symbolic and experiential products. Journal of Marketing Management, 27 (9– 10), 976–991.

Ministry of Finance. (2019). These are the impacts and opportunities of indonesia as a middle-income coun- try. https://www.kemenkeu.go.id. Accessed on Monday, June 19, 2019.

Musnaini & Yacob, S. (2015). Asian Buying Behavior Toward Counterfeit Product: Evidence from Jambi City, Sumatera Island, Indonesia. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1 (3), 146-155.

Netemeyer, R. G., Burton, S., & Lichtenstein, D. R. (1995). Trait aspects of vanity: Measurement and relevance to consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 616-626.

Norum, P. S., & Cuno, A. (2011). Analysis of the demand for counterfeit goods. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 15 (1), 27-40.

Phau, I., Teah, M., & Lee, A. (2009). Targeting buyers of counterfeits of luxury brands: A study on attitudes of Singaporean consumers. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 17 (1), 3-15.

Phau, I., & Teah, M. (2009). Devil wears (counterfeit) Prada: A study of antecedents and out- comes of attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26 (1), 15-27.

Quoquab, F., Pahlevan, S., Mohammad, J., & Thurasamy, R. (2017). Factors affecting consumers’ intention to purchase counterfeit product: Empirical study in the Malaysian market. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 29 (4), 837-853.

Radón, A. (2012). Counterfeit luxury goods online: An investigation of consumer perceptions. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 4 (2), 74–79.

Rahman, S., Haque, A., & Rahman, M. (2011). Purchasing behavior for pirated products. Journal of Management Research, 11 (1), 48-58.

Ramayah, T., Jantan, M., Chow, J. L. W., & Nasirin, S. (2003). Counterfeit music CDs: Social and per- sonality influences, demographics, attitudes and purchase intention: Some insights from Malaysia (pp. 1e13). In Academic Conferences Limited.

Sari, E. V. (2017). Ketika bisnis barang bermerk tergerus produk jiplakan. CNN Indonesia. https:// www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20170608094040-92-220253/ketika-bisnis-barang- bermerk-tergerus-produk-jiplakan. Accessed on Thursday, June, 13, 2019.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research method for business: A skill building approach. UK: Wiley. Sharma, P., & Chan, R. Y. K. (2016). Demystifying deliberate counterfeit purchase behavior: Towards a unified conceptual framework. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 34 (3), 318-335.

Shukla, P., & Purani, K. (2011). Comparing the importance of luxury value perceptions in cross-national contexts. Journal of Business Research, 65 (10), 1417-1424.

Socha, M. (2008). Analysts link Asia, Mideast to Luxe growth. Women’s Wear Daily, 195 (25), 17. Solomon, M. R. (2015). Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being (11th Edition). Prentice Hall: India.

Soh, C. Q. Y., Rezai, S., & Gu, M-L. (2017). A structural model of the antecedents and conse- quences of generation Y luxury fashion goods purchase decisions. Young Consumers, 18 (2),180-204.

Staake, T., Thiesse, F., & Fleisch, E. (2009). The emergence of counterfeit trade: A literature review. European Journal of Marketing, 43 (3/4), 320-34.

Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2009). Faking it: Personality and individual difference predictors of willingness to buy counterfeit goods. The Journal of Socio-Econom- ics, 38 (5), 820-825.

Tang, F., Tian, V. I., & Zaichkowsky, J. (2014). Understanding counterfeit consumption. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 26 (1), 4-20.

Teah, M., Phau, I., & Huang, Y. (2015). Devil continues to wear “counterfeit” Prada: A tale of two cities. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32 (3), 176–189.

The Jakarta Post. (2017). Counterfeits cause Rp 65.1t loss in Indonesia Study. https://www. thejakartapost.com/news/2017/02/21/counterfeits-cause-rp-65-1t-loss-in-indonesia- study.html Accessed on June 7, 2019.

Ting, M-S., Goh, Y-N., & Isa, S. M. (2016). Determining consumer purchase intentions toward counterfeit luxury goods in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 21 (4), 219-230.

Van Kempen, L. (2003). Fooling the eye of the beholder: Deceptive status signalling among the poor in developing countries. Journal of International Development, 15 (2), 157-177.

Vogel, A. T., & Watchravesringkan, K. (2017). Consumer evaluations of trend imitation: Brand equity, consumer attitudes and preference. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 26 (5), 516–527.

Wang, C. L., Chen, Z. X., Chan, A. K., & Zheng, Z. C. (2000). The Influence of hedonic values on consumer behaviors: An empirical investigation in China. Journal of Global Marketing, 14 (1), 169-186.

Wang, F., Zhang, H., Zang, H., & Ouyang, M. (2005). Purchasing pirated software: An initial examination of Chinese consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22 (6), 340–351.

Wang, P. Z. & Waller, D. S. (2008). Measuring consumer vanity: A cross-cultural validation. Psy- chology & Marketing, 23 (8), 665-687.

Wang, Y., Stoner, J. L., & John, D. R. (2014). You’re not fooling anyone: How social feedback affects moral disengagement and the purchase of counterfeit luxury products. Advances in Consumer Research, 42, 205-209.

Wee, C. H., Tan, S. J. & Cheok, K. H. (1995). Non-price determinants of intention to purchase counterfeit goods. International Marketing Review, 12 (6), 19-46.

Workman, J. E., & Lee, S. H. (2013). Vanity and public self-consciousness: A comparison of fashion consumer groups and gender. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35 (3), 307- 315.

World Bank. (2018). The world bank in middle income countries”, https://www.worldbank.org/ en/country/mic/overview. Accessed on July, 25, 2019.

Wu, Meng-Shan, S., Chaney, I., Chen, Cheng-Hao, S., Nguyen, B., & Melewar, T. C. (2015). Lux- ury fashion brands: Factors influencing young female consumers’luxury fashion purchas- ing in Taiwan. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 18 (3), 298-319.

Yeap, A. L., & Ramayah, T. (2006). Unraveling perceptions on counterfeit goods: Insights from the Malaysian mindset. Delhi Business Review, 7 (1), 47-58.

Zhou, L., & Wong, A. (2008). Exploring the influence of product conspicuousness and social compliance on purchasing motives of young Chinese consumers for foreign brands. Jour- nal of Consumer Behaviour, 7 (6), 470-483.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022 Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.