The influence of tympanic membrane perforation site on the hearing level of conductive hearing loss in chronic suppurative otitis media

https://doi.org/10.19106/JMedSci005403202206

Adhika Banu Wicaksono(1), Edhie Samodra(2), Melysa Fitriana(3), Feri Trihandoko(4), Anisa Haqul Khoiria(5), Dyah Ayu Kartika Dewanti(6*)

(1) Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/ Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta
(2) Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/ Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta
(3) Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/ Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta
(4) Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/ Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta
(5) Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/ Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta
(6) Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/ Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is an infection of the middle ear cavity both partially and totally. It is characterized by ear discharge through a tympanic membrane perforation for over a period of 2 to 6 weeks. Hearing loss is the most common complication of CSOM. One of the degrees of hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation is depending on the site of perforation, but this premise is still debatable because of pros and contras by some researchers. This study aimed to assess the degree of hearing loss in relation to the site of tympanic membrane perforation. A cross-sectional prospective study design was performed involving 43 patients of safe type CSOM who came to the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery from the period January 2016 to November 2018. All subjects were divided into 4 groups based on the site of perforation. There was a perforation in the posteroinferior, the posterosuperior, the anteroinferior, and the anterosuperior. A statistical analysis using Anova along with multivariate analysis was conducted. Our result showed that the most common site of tympanic membrane perforation was at the anteroinferior (30 samples, 59.8%). The highest hearing threshold was seen at posteroinferior with a mean hearing level of 37.7±2.0 dB, anteroinferior with a mean hearing level of 31.7±0.7 dB, anterosuperior with a mean hearing level 30.7±1.4 dB, and posterosuperior mean hearing level 28.9±1.5 dB. The difference was found significant with p=0.004. Posteroinferior tympanic membrane perforation had a higher number of hearing loss compared to the other sites. In conclusion, the tympanic membrane perforation site has an important role in the hearing level of conductive hearing loss in CSOM.


Keywords


chronic suppurative otitis media; tympanic membrane perforation; site of perforation; hearing threshold level; hearing loss

Full Text:

PDF


References

Afolabi OA, Salaudeen AG, Ologe FE, Nwabuisi C, Nwawolo CC. Pattern ofbacterial isolates in the middle ear discharge of patientswith chronicsuppurative otitis media in a tertiary hospital in North central Nigeria. AfrHealth Sci 2012; 12(3):362-8.
https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v12i3.18
2.Helmi. Otitis media supuratif kronik. In: Otitis media supuratifkronik: pengetahuan dasar, terapi medik, mastoidektomi, timpanoplasti. 2005. Jakarta: Balai penerbit FKUI.
http://lontar.ui.ac.id/detail?id=121045
3.Muftah S, Mackenzie I, Faragher B, Brabin B. Prevalence of Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media (CSOM) and Associated Hearing Impairment Among School-aged Children in Yemen. Oman Med J 2015; 30(5):358-65.
https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2015.72
4.Anggraeni R, Hartanto WW, Djelantik B, Ghanie A, Utama DS, Setiawan EP, et al.Otitis Media in Indonesian Urban and Rural SchoolChildren.Pediatr Infect Dis 2014;33(10):1010-5.
https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000000366
5.Rianto BUD. Kholesteatom timpani. Badan Penerbit Universitas GadjahMada. Yogyakarta. 2013; p 1-11.
6.Hunt L, Mulwafu W, Knott V, Ndamala CB, Naunje AW, Dewhurst S, et al. Prevalence of paediatric chronic suppurative otitis media and hearing impairment in rural Malawi: A cross-sectional survey. PLoS One 2017; 12(12):e0188950.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188950
7.Amali A, Hosseinzadeh N, Samadi S, Nasiri S, Zebardast J. Sensorineural hearing loss in patients with chronic suppurativeotitis media: Is there a significant correlation?Electronic Physician 2017; 9(2):3823-7.
https://doi.org/10.19082/3823
8.Kumara A, Nigam R, Jain A. Chronic suppurative otitis media- A clinicopathological study at a tertiary care hospital. Int J Appl Res 2015; 1(10):235-40.
9.Clark JG. Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification. ASHA 1981; 23(7):493-500.
10.Bhusal CL, Guragain RPS, Shrivastav RP. Correlation of hearingimpairment with site of tympanic membrane perforation. J Nepal Med Assoc 2005; 27(2):2-5.
11.Voss SE, Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN, Peake WT. How do Tympanicmembrane Perforations Affect Human Middle-ear Sound Transmission? Acta Otolaryngol 2001; 121(2):169-73.
https://doi.org/10.1080/000164801300043343
12.Nahata V, Patil CY, Patil RK, Gattani G,Disawal A, Roy A. Tympanic membrane perforation: Itscorrelation with hearing loss and frequencyaffected – An analytical study. Indian J Otolaryngol 2014; 20(1):10-5.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-7749.129796
13.Nepal A, Bhandary S, Mishra SC, Singh I, Kumar P. Assessment of quantitative hearing lossin relation to the morphology of central tympanic membrane perforation. Nepal Medial Collage 2007; 9(4):239-44.
14.Ibekwe TS, Nwaorgu OG, Ijaduola TG. Correlating the site of tympanic membraneperforation with hearing loss. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 2009; 9:1.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-9-1
15.Dessai TD, Philip R. Influence of Tympanic Membrane Perforationon Hearing Loss. Glob J Otolaryngol 2017; 5(5):134-7.
https://doi.org/10.19080/GJO.2017.05.555673
16.Patel-Chudasama M. Correlating the severity of conducting hearing loss with the sizeand site pars tensa tympanic membrane perforation using videootoscopy. Kenya: University of Nairobi. 2012. (dissertation).
http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/8299
17.Pannu KK, Chadha S, Kumar D,Preeti. Evaluation of hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation. Indian J. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 63(3):208-13.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0129-6
18.Virk RS, Kudawla K, Bansal S, Rathod R, Behera S. Correlation of Site and Size of Tympanic Membrane Perforation and Middle Ear Air Space Volume with Magnitude of Hearing Loss. Ann OtolNeurotol 2019; 2(10):10-5.
https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0039-1693095
19.Alsarhan HW, Dawood MR, Jwery AAK, Khammas AH, Hamad AK. Assessment of hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation. Adv Arab Acad Audio Vestibul J 2016; 3(1):16-9.
https://doi.org/10.4103/2314-8667.191237
20.Ali AH, Alshareda IM. Relationship between tympanic membrane perforation andconduvtive hearing loss in patient with chronic otitis media. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 4(10):11-7.
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20175606
21.Mehta RP, Rosowski JJ, Voss SE, O’Neil E, Merchant SN. Determinant of hearing loss in perforations of the tympanic membrane. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27(2):136-43.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mao.0000176177.17636.53
22.Gaur S, Sinha ON, Bhushan A, Batni G. Observations on tympanic membrane perforations (safe type) and hearing loss. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 69(1):29-34.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-016-1021-1
23.Bhusal CL, Guragain RPS, Shrivastav RP. Correlation of hearing impairment with site of tympanic membrane perforation. J Nepal Med Assoc 2005; 27(2):2-5.
24.Ravi KS, Ravishankar SN. Traumatic perforation: determinants of conductive hearing loss. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 3(3):592-5.
https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20172583



DOI: https://doi.org/10.19106/JMedSci005403202206

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1077 | views : 1372


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2022 Adhika Banu Wicaksono, Edhie Samodra, Melysa Fitriana, Feri Trihandoko, Anisa Haqul Khoiria, Dyah Ayu Kartika Dewanti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.