ANALISIS PERAN INSPEKTORAT DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA SEBAGAI AUDITOR INTERNAL PEMERINTAH DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SALAH SATU TEMUAN PADA UNIT PELAKSANA TEKNIS DAERAH ABC DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA TAHUN 2017
Ari Nugroho Cahyono(1*), Indra Bastian(2)
(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(2) Departemen Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This research aimed at analyzing the auditing process carried out by Yogyakarta Special Region Inspectorate in solving a finding in ABC Yogyakarta. It was also to investigate the audit communication and efforts done by the ABC Regional Technical Implementation Unit (UPTD) in solving and avoiding the finding to re-occur. Yogyakarta Special Region Inspectorate is a governmental internal auditor assigned to monitor the accountability administration and the activities of Yogyakarta Special Region government to achieve good governance. The ABC UPTD is one of the investigation objects with the Inspectorate’s biggest finding in the Special Region of Yogyakarta on the UPTD level in 2017. This research was qualitative with the case study method. To collect data, interviews and document analyses were used. The results showed that the finding process started from the auditor’s inspection on the janitors not yet registered for the Social Security Administration Body for Employment (BPJS Ketenagakerjaan). The inspection results were confronted with the document review to raise the case into an audit finding. There were then four audit communications with the investigation object, namely findings, affirmation, delivery of the Report of Audit Findings (LHP), and monitoring. The ABC UPTD then examined the finding closely and followed the Inspectorate recommendations. To avoid the re-occurrence of the finding, the ABC UPTD conducted an evaluation and improved its internal monitoring. The research was limited to one finding of the Inspectorate’s LHP, so that it is expected that the results can be interpreted carefully. In addition, the research respondents were also limited. In fact, the research has not yet analyzed any different cases or objects that require different settlements by the Inspectorate.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
DAFTAR PUSTAKA Astuti, Chandra Ayu. 2015. “Penentuan Kerugian Keuangan Negara yang Dilakukan Oleh BPK dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi”. Skripsi. Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang. Apriliyani, Ika B., Rita Anugerah, dan Poppy Nurmayanti. 2013. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempeng-aruhi Kualitas Audit APIP Pada Inspektorat Provinisi Riau. Pekbis Jurnal. Vol. 5, No.3. Hal: 145-158. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan. 2007. Standar Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara. Bastian, Indra. 2014. Pemeriksaan Sektor Publik Pemeriksaan Pertanggungjawaban Pemerintahan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Boyer, Martin. 1998. Models of insurance fraud: build-up, ex post moral hazard and optimal contracts. dissertation Presented to the Faculties o f the University o f Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Creswell, JW. 2014 Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications. Depdikbud, 1996. Kamus Besar Indonesia, Jakarta, Balai Pustaka. GAO. 2011. Government Auditing Standards 2011 Revision. Washington, D.C: United States Government Accountability office. Gudono, 2014. Edisi 3. Teori Organisasi, Yogyakarta: BPFE. Handayani, Maria D. 2015. Pengaruh Peran Auditor Internal Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Kasus Pada Inspektorat Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). Tesis. Program Magister Universitas Gadjah Mada. ETD-UGM. Yogyakarta. Hennink, M., Hutter, I., and Bailey, A. 2010.Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE Publications. Handayani, Maria D. 2015. Pengaruh Peran Auditor Internal Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Kasus Pada Inspektorat Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). Tesis. Program Magister Universitas Gadjah Mada. ETD-UGM. Yogyakarta. IIA. 2012. Standar Internasional Praktik Profesional Audit Internal (Standar). Miles dan Hubberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications Moleong, Lexy, J. 2015. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Penerbit Rosda.Bandung Murthy, D.N.P. 2007. “Product reliability and warranty:an overview and future research”. The University of Queensland, Brisbane Q 4072 – Australia Pratiwi, Wiwik. 2016. Audit Sektor Publik: mencapai akuntabilitas melalui audit laporan keuangan untuk menjamin transparansi organisasi sektor publik. Edisi 1. Bogor. In Media Republik Indonesia. 2004. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia No 1 Tahun 2004 Tentang Perbendaharaan Negara. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta. . 2003. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia No. 17 Tahun 2003 Tentang Keuangan Negara. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta. . 2008. Peraturan Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Nomor: PER/05/M.PAN/03/2008 tentang Standar Audit Aparat Pengawas Intern Pemerintah. . 2008. Peraturan Pemerintah No. 60 tentang Sistem Pengen-dalian Intern Pemerintah. Romarito, Citra S. 2017. Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Audit Internal Pada Inspektorat Kabupaten Sleman. Tesis. Program Magister Universitas Gadjah Mada. ETD-UGM. Yogyakarta. Tuanakotta, Theodorus M. .2010. Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif. Edisi 2. Jakarta: Selemba Empat. Yin, Robert K. 2015. Studi Kasus: Desain dan Metode. Penerjemah: M Djauzi Mudzakir. Edisi 1. Cetakan 14. Jakarta:Rajawali Pers.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/abis.v7i1.58819
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 721 | views : 549Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
2302 - 1500