Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research article

Vol 15 No 1 (2021): Volume 15, Number 1, 2021

The effects of quartic term mathematical model on the concentration profile of fixed bed gas adsorber

DOI
https://doi.org/10.22146/jrekpros.61308
Submitted
November 19, 2023
Published
June 30, 2021

Abstract

The need for a reliable mathematical model depicting the process inside a column adsorber has become a requisite in designing an effective gas adsorber. Even though this task can be done by using commercial software, it is still important to get an understanding of how the entire process happens.  In this paper, we discuss a new way to approximate the concentration profile inside the porous solids. It is an extension of the work of Liaw et al., who adopted a parabolic (i.e., quadratic) profile, which is a function of pellet radius while retaining the spherical symmetry. We extend their work by adding the quartic term. The inclusion of this new term still preserves the form of linear driving force approximation with some correction to Glueckauf’s parameter (i.e., the effective diffusivity coefficient). The addition of the correction will affect the breakthrough curve so that it affects the saturation time. In the binary system of hydrogen/methane discussed in this study, we found that a negative correction to the diffusivity coefficient will make the saturation happen earlier compared to that of the parabolic case, and vice versa. This study may help us design an efficient gas purifier, in particular when we set out for the regeneration of the adsorbent.

References

Bird, R.B., Stewart, W.E. and Lightfoot, E.N., 2006, Transport Phenomena, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York

Do, D.D. and Rice, R.G., 1986, Validity of the parabolic profile assumption in adsorption studies, AIChE J., 32 (1), 149–154.

Glueckauf, E., 1955, Theory of chromatography. Part 10. Formulæ for diffusion into spheres and their application to chromatography, Trans. Faraday Soc., 51 (0), 1540–1551.

Glueckauf, E. and Coates, J.I., 1947, Theory of chromatography. Part IV. The influence of incomplete equilibrium on the front boundary of chromatograms and on the effectiveness of separation, J. Chem. Soc., 1315–1321.

Kärger, J. and Ruthven, D.M., 1992, Diffusion in Zeolites and Other Microporous Solids, Wiley, New York

LeVan, M. ~D., Carta, G. and Yon, C. ~M., 1997, Adsorption and ion exchange, in Perry, R. and Green, D. (Eds.), Perry’s Chem. Eng. Handb., 7th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 16.

Liaw, C.H., Wang, J.S.P., Greenkorn, R.A. and Chao, K.C., 1979, Kinetics of fixed-bed adsorption: A new solution, AIChE J., 25 (2), 376–381.

Park, J.-H., Kim, J.-N., Cho, S.-H., Kim, J.-D. and Yang, R.T., 1998, Adsorber dynamics and optimal design of layered beds for multicomponent gas adsorption, Chem. Eng. Sci., 53 (23), 3951–3963.

Patton, A., Crittenden, B.D. and Perera, S.P., 2004, Use of the linear driving force approximation to guide the design of monolithic adsorbents, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 82 (8), 999–1009.

Rosen, J.B., 1952, Kinetics of a Fixed Bed System for Solid Diffusion into Spherical Particles, J. Chem. Phys., 20 (3), 387–394.

Ruthven, D.M., 1984, Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption Processes, Wiley, New York.

Tsai, M.C., Wang, S.S. and Yang, R.T., 1983, Pore-diffusion model for cyclic separation: Temperature swing separation of hydrogen and methane at elevated pressures, AIChE J., 29 (6), 966–975.

Yang, J., Lee, C.-H. and Chang, J.-W., 1997, Separation of hydrogen mixtures by a two-bed pressure swing adsorption process using zeolite 5A, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36 (7), 2789–2798.

Yang, R.T., 1987, Gas Separation by Adsorption Processes, Elsevier, available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-04269-7.

Yang, R.T. and Doong, S.J., 1985, Gas separation by pressure swing adsorption: A pore-diffusion model for bulk separation, AIChE J., 31 (11), 1829–1842.