Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research article

Vol 10 No 1 (2016): Volume 10, Number 1, 2016

Evaluasi kehandalan reaktor biogas skala rumah tangga di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta dengan metode analisis fault tree

DOI
https://doi.org/10.22146/jrekpros.34421
Submitted
November 16, 2023
Published
June 30, 2016

Abstract

Biogas technology is one of the solutions for improving sanitation, environment, economy and energy conservation especially for smallholder farmers who are applying mixed crop and livestock farming. Indonesia Domestic Biogas Programme (BIRU) has been implemented in DIY since 2009. However, the household digesters that operate effectively only accounts for less than 50% of the total existing digesters in 2017. These problems should be identified and analyzed for more effective implementation and efficient operation of small-sized biogas system in the future. This research applied fault tree analysis (FTA) method to identify failures and evaluated their effects on the operation of small-sized biogas based on processes, physical component, and human factor point of view. Fourty-one sets of BIRU biogas were selected and sampled using stratified purposive random sampling method. Nineteen minimal cut set and three subsystems were defined, which included process failures, infrastructure failures, and human errors. The fault probabilities of the three subsystems were found to be 0.79; 0.59; and 0.96, respectively. It implied that human error gave the highest probability of errors, followed by process failure, while the physical structure of the reactor had been sufficiently well controlled. This study suggested that careful selection on prospective users should be conducted prior to installation, to ensure the motivation of the users in maintaining the reactor in good conditions. Besides, trainings and assistance system are also required to improve the skills of the user to maintain the performance of their reactor.

References

  1. BPS, 2013, Agricultureal Statistic Base on Sensus 2013, (http://st2013.bps.go.id/ dev2index.php/site/index).
  2. BPS, 2016, Provinsi D.I.Yogyakarta Dalam Angka 2016, Badan Pusat Statistik DIY, Yogyakarta.
  3. Caceres, E.R., and Chiliquinge, B., 1986, Experiences with Rural Biodigesters in Latin America. In Biogas Technology, Transfer, and Diffusion, Elsevier, London and New York, pp 150-165.
  4. Cheng, S., Li, Z., Mang, H.P, Neupane, K, Wauthelet, M., and Huba, E.M., 2013, Application of FaultTree Approach for Technical Asessment of Small-Sized Biogas Systems in Nepal, Applied Energy 113, Elsevier, pp 1372-1381.
  5. Deng, K.Y., 1990, China actively promote the development of biogas technology, in Int Conf. Biogas Technology Implementation strategies, BORDA, Bremen, pp 242-253.
  6. Deublein, D., and Steinhauser, A., 2008, Biogas from Waste and Renewable Resources, Willey VCH Verlag GMbH&Co.KgaA, Deggendorf, Germany.
  7. ESDM, 2014, Final Report Indonesia Domestic Biogas Program.
  8. Fry, L.J., 1974, Practical Building of Methane Power Plant For Rural Energy Independence, 2nd edition, Chapel River Press, HampshireGreat Britain.
  9. McCarty, P.L., 1964, Anaerobic Waste Treatment Fundamentals, Part One, Chemistry and Microbiology, Public works 107-112.
  10. McCarty, P.L., 1964, Anaerobic Waste Treatment Fundamentals, Part Two, Environmental Requirement and Control, Public works 123-126.
  11. Nijaguna, B.T., 2002, Biogas Technology, New Age Internasional Publisher, New Delhi.
  12. Pandey, M., 2005, Fault Tree Analysis, Diktat, University of Waterloo, Waterloo.
  13. Putra, R.A.R.S, Liu, Z, and Lund, M, 2015, The Impact of Biogas Technology Adoption for Farm Households- Empirical evidence from mixed crop and livestock farming systems in Indonesia, Renewable and Sustainable energy reviews, Elsevier.
  14. Qu, W., Tu, Q., and Bluemling, B., 2013, Which Factors are Effective for Farmer’s Biogas Use Evidence from a large-scale survey in China, Energy Policy 63, Elsevier, China, pp 26-33.
  15. Rein, D.A., 2007, Converting Thin Stillage into Renewable Energy, Fertillizer and Recyclable Water, Repot Phase II-Thin Stillage, Rein and Associates, State of Minnesota.
  16. Shuler, M.L., and Kargi, F., 2002, Bioproses Engineering, 2st ed., Prentice Hall PTR, Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey, pp. 499, 500.
  17. Vesely, W.E., Goldberg, F.F., Robert, N.H., and Haasl, D.F., 1981, Fault Tree Handbook, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington D.C.
  18. Widodo, S., 2008, Penentuan Potensial Biogas dari Sampah Organik Kota Melalui Proses Anaerobik Digestion Sistem Batch Menggunakan Inokulum dari Instalasi Biogas Sobacken Boras Swedia sebagai Salah Satu Parameter dalam Perancangan Reaktor Biogas Skala Rumah Masal, Tesis, Jurusan Teknologi Pengelolaan dan Pemanfaatan Sampah/Limbah Perkotaan, Program studi Magister Sistem Teknik, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.