Abstract
This article is written to provide an understanding for World Trade Organization members as European Union trade partners to respond to the EU Deforestation Free Regulation. In achieving that purpose, this article implements the normative method through the implementation of a doctrinal, cases, and conceptual approach. There are three discussions presented in this article. The first discussion express that the EU might violate the rules on non-discrimination under Articles I:1 and III:4 GATT, and the prohibition on quantitative restriction under Article XI:1 GATT. The second discussion expresses that the EU may violate Articles 2.1 and 2.5 TBT Agreement which prohibits the implementation of a discriminative technical regulation and the implementation which reflects an unnecessary barrier to international trade. Last but not least, the third discussion states that the EU may justify this measure based on the public moral, and the protection of human, animal, and plant life and health. The third discussion also expresses the finding of this paper which is that international cooperation can be utilized as an instrument that may address the conflict of interests caused by the implementation of the WTO law and the international environmental law.
References
Ammirudin, & Asikin, Z. (2018). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Argent, P. d’. (2021a). International Law Textbook: Claiming Responsibility. UC Louvain & edX.
Argent, P. d’. (2021b). International Law Textbook: Making International Law Part I. UC Louvain & edX.
Argent, P. d’. (2021c). International Law: Upholding Peace. UC Louvain & edX.
Babu, R. (2018). WTO and the Protection of Public Morals (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3256707). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3256707
Balogh, J. M., & Jámbor, A. (2020). The Environmental Impacts of Agricultural Trade: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 12(3), 1152. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031152
Balogh, J. M., & Mizik, T. (2021). Trade–Climate Nexus: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Economies, 9(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9030099
Beshkardana, P. A., Katayoon. (2021). The limits of transparency: China, the United States, and the World Trade Organization. In Cultures of Transparency. Routledge.
Bose, B. P., Dhar, M., & Ghosh, D. (2022). Stockholm Conference to Kyoto Protocol – A Review of Climate Change Mitigation Initiatives. International Journal of Earth Sciences Knowledge and Applications, 4(2), Article 2.
Bossche, P. V. den, & Zdouc, W. (2022). The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases, and Materials (Fifth Edition). Cambridge University Press.
Chen, Y. (2021). Reconciling common but differentiated responsibilities principle and no more favorable treatment principle in regulating greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping. Marine Policy, 123, 104317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104317
Dewi, Y., & Azzahra, M. J. (2022). Re-examining Indonesia’s Nickel Export Ban: Does it Violate the Prohibition to Quantitative Restriction? Padjadjaran Journal of International Law, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.23920/pjil.v6i2.797
Do your goods comply with the mandatory due diligence obligations in the new EU Deforestation Regulation 2023/1115? (2023, June 20). https://www.twobirds.com/en/insights/2023/global/do-your-goods-comply-with-the-mandatory-due-diligence-obligations
Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on the making available on the Union market and the export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 (Text with EEA relevance), 150 OJ L (2023). http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1115/oj/eng
Gochhayat, S. A. (2010). “Social Engineering by Roscoe Pound”: Issues in Legal and Political Philosophy (SSRN Scholarly Paper 1742165). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1742165
Hainsch, K., Löffler, K., Burandt, T., Auer, H., Crespo Del Granado, P., Pisciella, P., & Zwickl-Bernhard, S. (2022). Energy transition scenarios: What policies, societal attitudes, and technology developments will realize the EU Green Deal? Energy, 239, 122067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122067
Hargita, Y., Giessen, L., & Günter, S. (2020). Similarities and Differences between International REDD+ and Transnational Deforestation-Free Supply Chain Initiatives—A Review. Sustainability, 12(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030896
Hasan, A. K. M. R., & Nasrin, K. (2021). Reforming the Dispute Settlement Mechanism of WTO: Challenges and Prospects (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4175796). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4175796
Herlindah, & Darmawan, Y. (2022). Development Legal Theory and Progressive Legal Theory: A Review, In Indonesia’s Contemporary Legal Reform. Peradaban Journal of Law and Society, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.59001/pjls.v1i1.22
Hutt, D. (2022, July 22). What are the EU’s options in the palm oil standoff? – DW – 07/22/2022. Dw.Com. https://www.dw.com/en/what-are-eus-options-in-palm-oil-row-with-malaysia-and-indonesia/a-62564129
Khademi Adel, T., Modir, M., & Ravanshadnia, M. (2021). An analytical review of construction law research. Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management, 29(5), 1931–1945. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2020-0306
Koul, A. K. (2018). Guide to the WTO and GATT Economics, Law and Politics (6th Edition). Springer.
Lopez, J. G. V., & Rojas, J. J. B. (2019). VIRTUAL PROTECTIONISM: OVERVIEW OF MFN TARIFFS AND BOUND TARIFFS IN SOUTH AMERICA. Journal of International Studies, 12(4), 63–78.
Maciel, C., & Bock, B. (2020). Animal welfare measures and the WTO Post-EC - seal products case: A renewed debate and research agenda. The Economics of Farm Animal Welfare: Theory, Evidence and Policy, 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786392312.0156
Mohapatra, C. K., & Mishra, A. (2020). WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION: AN OVERVIEW. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology, 17(6), Article 6.
Nevalainen, A. (2021). EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism – its purpose and effects on carbon leakage. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi:443/handle/123456789/107496
Norouzi, N., & Fani, M. (2022). Globalization and the oil market: An overview on considering petroleum as a trade commodity. Journal of Energy Management and Technology, 6(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.22109/jemt.2021.276311.1285
Nwoke, U. (2020). Imposition of trade tariffs by the USA on China: Implications for the WTO and international trade law. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 19(2), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/JITLP-01-2019-0003
Radi, Y. (2013). The “Human Nature” of International Investment Law (SSRN Scholarly Paper 2278857). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2278857
Relay 17th meeting of the multi-stakeholder platform on protecting and Restoring the World’s Forest (EUDR). (2023). Direktorat Perundingan Organisasi Perdagangan Dunia Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia.
Simbolon, P. G. M., & Damayanti, A. (2023). Indonesian Trade Policy in Adjusting the 2020 WTO’s Trade Policy Review. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 12(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.18196/jhi.v12i1.18038
Sood, M. (2018). Hukum Perdagangan Internasional. Raja Grafindo Persada.
The European Commission. (2021, November 19). COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT minimizing the risk of deforestation and forest degradation associated with products placed on the EU market Accompanying the document Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the making available on the Union market as well as export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010—Publications Office of the EU. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/43c4301d-4943-11ec-91ac-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
The Paris Agreement | UNFCCC. (n.d.). Retrieved July 8, 2023, from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement
United Nations. (2022, December 16). The Convention on Biological Diversity. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. https://www.cbd.int/convention/
WTO | dispute settlement - DS381: United States — Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing, and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products. (n.d.). Retrieved July 11, 2023, from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds381_e.htm
WTO | dispute settlement—The disputes—DS2. (n.d.). Retrieved July 11, 2023, from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds2_e.htm
WTO | dispute settlement—The disputes—DS58. (n.d.). Retrieved July 11, 2023, from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds58_e.htm
WTO | dispute settlement—The disputes—DS400. (n.d.). Retrieved July 11, 2023, from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds400_e.htm
WTO | legal texts—Marrakesh agreement. (n.d.-a). Retrieved July 8, 2023, from https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/04-wto_e.htm
WTO | legal texts—Marrakesh agreement. (n.d.-b). Retrieved July 9, 2023, from https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/06-gatt_e.htm
WTO | legal texts—Marrakesh Agreement. (n.d.-c). Retrieved July 10, 2023, from https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/17-tbt_e.htm
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.