Revisiting Predictions about the Future of Human Life in 20th Century American Sci-Fis
Rahmawan Jatmiko(1*)
(1) Department of Languages and Literatures, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Predictions and illustrations of life in the future are often integrated in works of science fiction, which could not be immediately proven yet possibly fascinating when looked back on several decades later or at the times predicted in the works. Science fiction authors foretell such events by borrowing theories, concepts, or simply terms used by scientists. Those theories, concepts, and terms can be written in scientific journals or in more popular media. American science fiction works, for instance, illustrate the future by their adaptation in the forms of more popular media such as movies, video games, and the works categorized as the subgenres of cyber literature. All of them are discussed in this paper from the lens of New Historicism, which believes in equality between literary and non-literary texts in viewing phenomena that exist in society, one of which is the relationship between science fiction works, their writers, their readers, and society. Technology is seen as a product of society, so it becomes broadly part of culture. Meanwhile, emerging technology is sometimes coincidental and random, so it can also be seen that technology determines people’s movements and lifestyles. This study contributes to ongoing discussions on the ethical and societal implications of speculative narratives by highlighting the interconnectedness between literature, science, technology, and society.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aldrete, G. S. (2014). Hammers, Axes, Bulls, and Blood: Some Practical Aspects of Roman Animal Sacrifice. The Journal of Roman Studies, 104, 28–50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43286865
Alexandre, S. (2019). Inspired Invention – Bose Fellows. Bose Fellows. Retrieved June 25, 2023, from https://bosefellows.mit.edu/projects/inspired-invention/
BBC. (2015, July 4). Was HG Wells the first to think of the atom bomb? BBC. Retrieved June 25, 2023, from https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-33365776
Brantlinger, P. (1980). The Gothic Origins of Science Fiction. NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction, 14(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/1345322
Frank, R. (1962). Social Evolution and the Human Species. The American Catholic Sociological Review, 23(4), 310–323. https://doi.org/10.2307/3708580
Ghiglione, L. (2010). Does science fiction — yes, science fiction — suggest futures for news? Daedalus, 139(2), 138–150. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20749832
Hayot, E. (2021). Video Games & the Novel. Daedalus, 150(1), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01841
Islam, M. S. (2021, August 31). Augmented Reality and Life in the Cyberspace in William Gibson’s Neuromancer. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 12(4), 30-34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354740098_Augmented_Reality_and_Life_in_the_Cyberspace_in_William_Gibson's_Neuromancer
Lombardo, T. (2015, December). Science Fiction: The Evolutionary Mythology of the Future, 20(2). DOI:10.6531/JFS.2015.20(2).A5
Luegenbiehl, H. C. (1984). 1984 and the Power of Technology. Social Theory and Practice, 10(3), 289–300. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23556567
McConnell, F. D. (1980). H. G. Wells: Utopia and Doomsday. The Wilson Quarterly (1976-), 4(3), 176–186. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40255984
Moravec, H. (1990). Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. Harvard University Press.
Patrick Parrinder. (2018). A Choice of Nightmares [Review of Dystopia: A Natural History. A Study of Modern Despotism, Its Antecedents, and Its Literary Diffractions, by Gregory Claeys]. Science Fiction Studies, 45(2), 357–361. https://doi.org/10.5621/sciefictstud.45.2.0357
Petroski, H. (2005). Engineering: Technology and the Humanities. American Scientist, 93(4), 304–307. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27858602
Science Museum. (2018, November 12). The invention of mobile phones. Science Museum. Retrieved June 25, 2023, from https://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/invention-mobile-phones
Schmeink, L. (2016a). Dystopia, Science Fiction, Posthumanism, and Liquid Modernity. In Biopunk Dystopias (pp. 18–70). Liverpool University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1ps33cv.5
Schmeink, L. (2016b). Works Cited. In Biopunk Dystopias (pp. 247–265). Liverpool University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1ps33cv.12
Shaeri, R. (2019, September 22). The history of the future: how science fiction has evolved across time. The Varsity. Retrieved June 26, 2023, from https://thevarsity.ca/2019/09/22/the-history-of-the-future-how-science-fiction-has-evolved-across-time/
Veeser, H. (1989). The New Historicism. Routledge.
Viires, P. (2005). Literature in Cyberspace. Folklore (Estonia). 10.7592/FEJF2005.29
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/rubikon.v11i1.93467
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 956 | views : 405Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Rubikon : Journal of Transnational American Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.