Village-Owned Enterprise Strategy in Improving the Economic Welfare of Sustainable Farmers

Fadlan Habib; Eddy Kiswanto

doi:10.22146/jp.97556

Village-Owned Enterprise Strategy in Improving the Economic Welfare of Sustainable Farmers

https://doi.org/10.22146/jp.97556

Fadlan Habib^(1*), Eddy Kiswanto⁽²⁾

(1) Center for Population and Policy Studies, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Doctoral Program of Leadership and Policy Innovation, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This research analyzis the role of BUMDes and other multi-stakeholders in efforts to improve the welfare of farmers in rural areas. The research uses qualitative methods with explanation analysis techniques. The results of the research show that the problems faced by farmers are largely influenced by middlemen’s play in determining prices which has an impact on farmers’ losses, apart from that, it is also influenced by the lack of access to information related to the market. For this reason, the village government is trying to create an agricultural business unit under the auspices of BUMDes which provides assistance to farmers in the form of capital support, marketing and also providing market guarantees. This innovation is considered successful in improving farmers’ livelihoods and welfare. The agricultural economic development process carried out by BUMDes is basically the result of collaborative work carried out jointly with farmers, the private sector and supra-villages. An institutional pattern built on trust, transparency and strong commitment is the key to their success in building collaborative governance.

Keywords

agriculture; BUMDes; farmers; welfare

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abebe, G. K., Bijman, J., & Royer, A. 2016. Are middlemen facilitators or barriers to improve smallholders’ welfare in rural economies? Empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Journal of Rural Studies, 43, 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jrurstud.2015.12.004. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. 2008. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi. org/10.1093/jopart/mum032. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Sleman. 2019. Kecamatan Ngaglik Dalam Angka 2019. xvi + 82 halaman. https://slemankab. bps.go.id/publication/2018/09/26/ 81a9c413654574037ea0bf5b/ kecamatan-ngaglik-dalam-angka-2018. html. Bank Indonesia. 2015. Skema Pembiayaan Pertanian dengan Pendekatan Konsep Rantai Nilai. Cook, M. L. 1995. The Future of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo- Institutional Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(5), 1153– 1159. Doh, S., & Mcneely, C. L. 2012. A multi- dimensional perspective on social capital and economic development: An exploratory analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 49(3), 821–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-011-0449- 1. Eko, S., Khasanah, T. I., Widuri, D., Handayani, N., Qomariyah, P., Aksa, S., & Kurniawan, B. 2014. Desa Membangun Indonesia (Cetakan Pe). Elizabeth, R. 2007. Fenomena Sosiologis Metamorphosis Petani : Ke Arah Keberpihakan Pada Masyarakat Petani Di Pedesaan Yang Terpinggirkan Terkait Konsep Ekonomi Kerakyatan. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 25(1), 29–42. Fernandez, M. N. 2016. Badan Usaha Milik Desa Mampu Perpendek Rantai Distribusi. Bisnis.Com. Hadna, Agus Heruanto; Zamroni, Sunaji; Hudayana, Bambang; Purwanto, E. A. 2017. Kajian Implementasi Dana Desa 2017. Hutchinson, F. 2016. Evolving Paradigms in Regional Development in Malaysia. ISEAS Economics Working Paper, November, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.13140/ RG.2.2.19324.95364. Ibrahim, N. 2012. Rural Transformations Development: a review on Malaysia’s transformation program. The International Conference on Social Sciences & Humanities, December 2012. Kemenkeu. 2017. Buku Saku Dana Desa. Kementerian Keuangan RI. Kurniawan, B. 2015. Desa Mandiri, Desa membangun. Kementerian Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal, dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia. Miles, B. Mathew dan Huberman, M. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-metode Baru. UIP. Mohd Arshar, F., & Shamsudin, M. N. 1997. Rural Development Model in Malaysia. Management, 1–23. Moleong, L. J. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya. Prabowo, T. H. E. 2014. Developing Bumdes (Village-owned Enterprise) for Sustainable Poverty Alleviation Model Village Community Study in Bleberan-Gunung Kidul-Indonesia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 30(30 A), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.30.icmrp.4. Prasetyo, R. A. 2017. Peranan Bumdes Dalam Pembangunan Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Di Desa Pejambon Kecamatan Sumberrejo Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Jurnal Dialektika, xi(1). Putnam, R. D. 1993. The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life. The American Prospect, 13, 35–42. Putra, S. A. 2015. Badan Usaha Milik Desa: Spirit Usaha Kolektif Desa. Kementerian Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal, Dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia. Rahayu, D. 2017. Strategi Pengelolaan Dana Desa untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Desa Kalikayen Kabupaten Semarang. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 6(2). Rashid, M. F., Ngah, I., & Misnan, S. H. 2019. Revitalizing Rural Areas in Malaysia: A Framework for Economic Revitalization. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 385(1). https:// doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/385/1/012004. Razali, N. M., & Rashid, M. F. 2021. A framework for incorporating the global environment of rural community. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 881(1), 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755- 1315/881/1/012057 Ritchie, Robert, Brindley, Clare S. and Armstrong, N. 2008. Risk assessment and relationship management : practical approach to supply chain risk management. Sajogyo; Sajogyo, P. 2002. Sosiologi Pedesaan. Gadjah Mada University Press. Smeru. 2018. Pemanfaatan Dana Desa. Buletin SMERU, 2, 1–16. Sofianto, A. 2017. Kontribusi Dana Desa terhadap Pembangunan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Kebumen dan Pekalongan. Matra Pembaruan, 1(1), 23–32. Srirejeki, K. 2018. Empowering the Role of Village Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) for Rural Development : Case of Indonesia. Journal of Accounting, Management, and Economics, 20(1), 5–10. http://jos. unsoed.ac.id/index.php/jame/article/ view/1018/727 Sudjatmiko, T. 2016. Kendalikan Produk Pertanian, BUMDes Jaga Stabilitas Harga Pangan. Krjogja.Com. Suseno, D., & Suyatna, H. 2007. Mewujudkan Kebijakan Pertanian yang Pro-Petani. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 10(3), 267–294. https://doi.org/10.22146/ JSP.11008 Tarmidzi dan Arismiyati, I. 2018. Pengembangan Potensi Ekonomi Desa dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Ekonomi Masyarakat Melalui Badan Usaha Milik Desa. DIMAS, 18(1), 129–142. Wang, T., Lan, Q., & Chu, Y. 2013. Supply Chain Financing Model : Based on China’s Agricultural Products Supply Chain. The 2nd International Conference On Systems Engineering and Modeling (ICSEM-13), 153–157. Yudha, E. P. 2018. Implementasi Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kinerja Pembangunan Perdesaan (Studi Kasus Kabupaten Pandeglang – Banten). Zuhdiyaty, N., Maryunani, & Syafitri, W. 2019. Analysis of BUMDes strengthening for community welfare with the SLA approach (Case study of Kalipucang Village, Tutur, Pasuruan). International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(2), 40–43. Zuraya, N. 2018. Kemendes: Jumlah BUMDes Mencapai 41 Ribu Unit. Republika.Co.Id.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jp.97556