Aktor dan Konfigurasi Subsistem dalam Perubahan Kebijakan Pengolahan Sampah Menjadi Listrik di Provinsi DKI Jakarta

Sri Utami Gayatri; M. Baiquni; Muhadjir Darwin; Tumiran Tumiran

doi:10.22146/jp.44149

Aktor dan Konfigurasi Subsistem dalam Perubahan Kebijakan Pengolahan Sampah Menjadi Listrik di Provinsi DKI Jakarta

https://doi.org/10.22146/jp.44149

Sri Utami Gayatri^(1*), M. Baiquni⁽²⁾, Muhadjir Darwin⁽³⁾, Tumiran Tumiran⁽⁴⁾

(1) Magister dan Doktor Studi Kebijakan, Fakultas Pascasarjana, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
(2) Fakultas Geografi, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
(3) Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
(4) Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Population growth in DKI Jakarta Province continues to increase. The consequence of population increase is indeed in the volume of waste which also continues to increase and at the same time the need for energy is increasing. Since 2011 DKI Provincial Government has implemented waste to energy (WTE) in Bantargebang TPST, but it was not as the main processing unit. Since 2011, DKI Provincial Government has also compiled a plan (2012-2032 Waste Management System Master Plan) to make WTE as a central processing unit by making an Intermediate Treatment Facility (ITF) at four points in DKI Jakarta Province. It was only in 2018, one ITF in Sunter began to be built. To unravel the problem of the slow implementation of RISPS, researcher tried to map the existing network of actors and to explore the extent to which the configuration of the subsystem accepted new ideas and actors in the context of accelerating WTE development. The results of this study indicated that the policy change process runs gradually paradigmatically oriented to policy goals in an open subsystem.

Keywords

waste to energy; waste into electricity; policy network; actors

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adams, Gordon. 1981. The Iron Triangle: The Politics of Defense Contracting. New York, Council on Economic Priorities.

Bappenas. 2010. Indonesia Climate Change Sectoral Roadmap (ICCSR) 2010. Jakarta, Bappenas.

-----. 2017. Public Private Partnerships. Jakarta, Bappenas.

BPS. 2016. Statistik Indonesia 2016. Jakarta, Badan Pusat Statistik Republik Indonesia.

-----. 2017. Laporan Bulanan Data Sosial Ekonomi Juni 2017. Jakarta, Badan Pusat Statistik Republik Indonesia, Edisi 85.

Dente. 2014. “Who Decides? Actors and Their Resources”, Understanding Policy Decisions. PoliMI SpringerBriefs.

Hayden, Gregory. 2002. “Policymaking Network of the Iron-Triangle Subgovernment for Licensing Hazardous Waste Facilities”, Journal of Economic Issues, CBA Faculty Publications. Lincoln, University of Nebraska.

Howlett & Rayner. 1995. “DO ideas matter? Policy network configurations and resistance to policy change in the Canadian forest sector”, Canadian public administration.

Howlett, Michael. 2002. “Do Networks Matter? Linking Policy Network Structure to Policy Outcomes: Evidence from Four Canadian Policy Sectors 1990-2000”, Canadian Journal of Political Science. Burnaby.

Howlett, Michael and Ramesh, M. 1995. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press.

Kenis & Schneider. 1991. “Policy networks and policy analysis: Scrutinizing a new analytical toolbox”, Policy networks: Empirical evidence and theoretical considerations (pp. 25-59), Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

Kompas. 2018. “ITF Sunter Akan Ubah 2.200 Ton Sampah Per Hari Jadi 35 Megawatt”. Jakarta.

Law, J. 1992. Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice.

-----. 2007. “Actor network theory and material semiotics”, http://www. heterogeneities.net/publications/ LawANTandMaterialSemiotics.pdf.

Popoola, Olufemi O. 2016. “Actors in Decision Making and Policy Process”, G.J.I.S.S.,Vol. 5(1): 47-51, Global institute for research and education.

Priyatma, Johanes Eka. 2013. Potensi Teori Jejaring Aktor Untuk Memahami Inovasi Teknologi. Yogyakarta, Seminar RiTekTra.

Rhodes. 2016. The Theory and Practice of Governance: the Next Steps. Wuhan University.

Shull, Steven A. 1999, American Civil Rights Policy from Truman to Clinton: The Role of Presidential Leadership/ York and London, M.E Sharpe, Armonk New.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jp.44149