Conflict Resolution and Democratisation in the Aftermath of the 2004 Tsunami: A Comparative Study of Aceh and Sri Lanka

Kristian Stokke; Olle Törnquist; Gyda Marås Sindre

doi:10.22146/pcd.25670

Conflict Resolution and Democratisation in the Aftermath of the 2004 Tsunami: A Comparative Study of Aceh and Sri Lanka

https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.25670

Kristian Stokke^(1*), Olle Törnquist⁽²⁾, Gyda Marås Sindre⁽³⁾

(1) University of Oslo
(2) University of Oslo
(3) University of Oslo
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The earthquake off the west coast of Sumatra on 26 December 2004 unleashed a tsunami in the Indian Ocean that affected more than a dozen countries throughout South and Southeast Asia and stretched as far as the northeastern coast of Africa. The two worst affected areas - North-East Sri Lanka and the Aceh region in Indonesia - have both been marked by protracted intra-state armed conflicts. In the immediate aftermath of the tsunami, international journalists and humanitarian actors argued that the disaster could actually constitute and opportunity for conflict resolution, as the scale and urgency of humanitarian needs should bring the protagonists together in joint efforts for relief, reconstruction and conflict resolution. In contrast, research on the impacts of natural disasters often concludes that disasters tend to deepen rather than resolve conflicts. Four years after the tsunami it can be observed that Aceh and North-East Sri Lanka have followed highly divergent trajectories. In Aceh, a Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of Indonesia and Gerakan Aceh Merdeka (GAM) was signed shortly after the tsunami and has been followed by peace and a process od political integration into Indonesian democracy. In Sri Lanka, the tsunami created a humanitarian pause from the gradual escalation of hostilities and an attempt to create a joint mechanism between the Government of Sri Lanka (GOSL) and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) for handling humanitarian aid, but Sri Lanka has since the returned to full-scale warfare between the GOSL and LTTE.

This brief article, which is based on work in progress, will highlight some key lessons and preliminary conclusions for each of these research quetions: (1) How and to what extent has reconstruction/development been linked to processes of conflict resolution and rights based democratization?; (2) How and to what extent has a process of rights based democratization been related to the parallel processes of revonstruction/development and conflict resolution?; (3) How and to what extent have the parallel processes of reconstruction/development, conflict resolution and democratization generated political transformations of the armed insurgency movements?

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aspinall, E 2006, The Helsinki Agreement: A more promising basis for peace in Aceh? Policy Studies 20, The East-West Center, Washington D.C.

Balasingham, A 2004, War and peace. Armed struggle and peace efforts of liberation tigers, Mitcham, Fairmax, UK.

Bastian, S 2007, The politics of foreign aid in Sri Lanka: promoting markets and supporting peace, Sri Lanka, International Centre for Ethnic Studies, Colombo.

Bastian, S and R. Luckham (eds.) 2003, Can democracy be designed? The politics of institutional choice in confl ict-torn societies, Zed, London.

Collier, P., V. L. Elliott, H. Hegre, A. Hoeffl er, M. Reynal-Querol and N. Sambanis 2003, Breaking the confl ict trap: civil war and development policy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

De Votta, N 2004, Blowback. Linguistic nationalism, institutional decay, and ethnic confl ict in Sri Lanka, Stanford University Press, California.

de Zeeuw, J (ed.) 2008, From soldiers to politicians: transforming rebel movements after civil war, Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO.

Duffi eld, M 2001, Global governance and the new wars: the merging of development and security, Zed, London.

Goodhand, J. and B. Klem 2005, Aid, confl ict and peacebuilding in Sri Lanka, The Asia Foundation, Colombo.

Harriss, J., K. Stokke and O. Törnquist (eds.) 2004, Politicising democracy: the new local politics of democratisation, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

International Crisis Group 2005, Aceh: a new chance for peace, Asia Briefi ng no. 40, International Crisis Group, Jakarta/Brussels.

Kaldor, M 1999, New and old wars: organised violence in a global era, Polity Press, Cambridge.

Kingsbury, D. and L. McCulloch 2006, ’Military business in Aceh’, in A Reid (ed.), Verandah of violence: the background to the Aceh problem, Singapore University Press, Singapore.

Luckham, R., A.M. Goetz and M. Kaldor, M 2003, ‘Democratic institutions and democratic politics’, In S Bastian and R Luckham (eds), Can democracy be designed? The politics of institutional choice in confl ict-torn societies, London, Zed.

Miller, M.A 2004, ’The Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam law: a serious response to acehnese separatism?’, Asian Ethnicity, vol. 5, no.3.

Miller, M.A 2006, ’What’s special about apecial autonomy in Aceh?’ , in A Reid (ed.), Verandah of violence: the background to the Aceh problem, Singapore University Press, Singapore.

Paris, R 2004, At war’s end: building peace after civil confl ict, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Rainford, C. and A. Satkunanathan 2008, Mistaking politics for governance. The Politics of interim arrangements in Sri Lanka, International Center for Ethnic Studies, Colombo.

Ramsbotham, O., T. Woodhouse and H. Miall 2005, Contemporary confl ict resolution 2nd ed, Polity Press, Cambridge.

Richmond, O.P 2007, The transformation of peace, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

Rupesinghe, K 2006, Negotiating peace in Sri Lanka: efforts, failures and lessons (Volume I and II), The Foundation for Co-Existence, Colombo.

Schulte-Nordholt, H 2004, ‘Decentralisation in Indonesia: less state, more democracy?’, in J.Harriss, K. Stokke and O. Törnquist (eds), Politicising democracy: the new local politics of democratisation, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills.

Schulze, K.E 2004, The Free Aceh Movement (GAM): anatomy of a separatist organization, The East-West Center, Washington D.C.

Shanmugaratnam, N (ed.) 2008, Between war and peace in Sudan and Sri Lanka: deprivation and livelihood revival, James Currey, Oxford.

Shanmugaratnam, N. and K. Stokke 2008, ‘Development as a precursor to confl ict resolution: a critical review of the fi fth peace process in Sri Lanka’, in Nadarajah Shanmugaratnam (ed.), Between war and peace in Sudan and Sri Lanka: deprivation and livelihood revival, James Currey, Oxford.

Sidel, J.T 2004, ‘Bossis and democracy in the Philippines, Thailand and Indonesia: towards an alternative framework for the study of ‘local strongmen’, in J. Harriss, K. Stokke and O. Törnquist (eds), Politicising democracy: the new local politics of democratisation, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills.

Sindre, G.M 2008, ‘From separatism to political inclusion; the political transformation of the Free Aceh Movement (GAM)’, in O. Törnquist, Stanley and T. Birks (eds.), Aceh: the role of democracy for peace and reconstruction, PCD Press, Jogjakarta.

Stokke, K 2006, ‘Building The Tamil Eelam State: Emerging state nstitutions and forms of governance in LTTE-controlled Areas in Sri Lanka’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1021-1040.

Stokke, K 2007, ‘War by other means: the LTTE’s strategy of institutionalising power sharing in the context of transition from war to peace’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1197-1201.

Törnquist, O 2008, ‘Aceh’s democracy. Diagnosis and prognosis’, in O. Törnquist, Stanley and T. Birks (eds.), Aceh: the role of democracy for peace and reconstruction,PCD Press, Jogjakarta.

Uyangoda, J (ed.) 2005, Confl ict, confl ict resolution and peace building, Department of Political Science and Public Policy, University of Colombo, Colombo.

Uyangoda, J. and Perera, M (eds.) 2003, Sri Lanka’s peace process 2002. Critical perspectives, Social Scientists’ Association, Colombo.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.25670