A correlation between malocclusion complexity with periodontal status

https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.92375

Mahardhika Setya Nugroho(1), Krisnawati Krisnawati(2*), Retno Widayati(3), Robert Lesang(4)

(1) Program Study Specialist Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
(2) Department Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
(3) Department Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
(4) Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Malocclusion is the third most common dental problem after caries and periodontal diseases, with prevalence reaching 56% in the world and 89% in Indonesia (2006), respectively. Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON) is an assessment tool to measure the necessity, complexity, and success of orthodontic treatment. Although several studies have reported a causal relationship between malocclusion and periodontal disease, the association is still under debate. The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between malocclusion complexity based on ICON and the periodontal status of patients who underwent orthodontic treatment at the Orthodontic Clinic, Dental Hospital, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia. Material and Method: This was an analytical study with a cross-sectional design. Fifty-four new patients (aged 25-44 years) were included. Patients who had systemic disease, used fixed orthodontic appliance or prosthesis, and had some local factors were excluded. Periodontal status, ICON complexity, study model, and radiographic results were examined and analyzed. An interclass correlation test was carried out to obtain data reliability. Result: the majority of malocclusion complexities based on ICON were mild (46.3%). Periodontal status consisted of Plaque Index (good, 81.5%; moderate, 18.5%), Papillary Bleeding Index (no bleeding, 90.7%; severe bleeding, 1.9%), Clinical Attachment Loss (moderate, 40.7%; severe, 22.2%), gingival recession (mild, 83.3%; severe, 7.4%), periodontal probing depth (moderate, 77.8%; severe, 3.7%), and alveolar bone height (middle third, 53.7%; cervical third, 46.3%). Conclusion: No significant correlation was found between malocclusion complexity based on ICON and periodontal status.


Keywords


ICON; malocclusion; orthodontic; periodontal status



References

1. Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL,Vig KWL. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques. 6th ed. USA: St. Louis, Elsevier Ltd; 2017. 9-15, 18-25.

2. Kalantari M, Ziaalddini H, Jaffari M, Kalantari M. Orthodontic treatment need and complexity
among 13-15 year-old Schoolchildren in Kerman, Iran. J Dent (shiraz). 2019; 20(2): 95-
101. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.44930

3. Cobourne MT, DiBiase AT. Handbook Of Ortodontics. 2th ed. UK: Elsevier Ltd; 2016.
1-14, 26-29.

4. Lombardo IG, Vena F, Negri P, et al. Worldwide prevalence of malocclusion in the different stages of dentition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Paediatr
Dent. 2020; 21(2): 115-122.

5. Adhani R, Rizal HK, Widodo SR. Perbedaan indeks karies antara maloklusi ringan dan
berat pada remaja di Pondok Pesantren Darul Hijrah Martapura. Dentino J Kedok Gigi. 2014;
2(1):13-17

6. Suwandi T. Keterkaitan antara bidang ortodonti dan periodonti dalam perawatan estetika rongga mulut. Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Terpadu. 2020; 2(1): 68-74. doi: 10.25105/jkgt.v2i1.7533

7. Könönen E, Gursoy M, Gursoy UK. Periodontitis: a multifaceted disease of toothsupporting
tissues. J. Clin. Med. 2019; 8(8): 1135. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081135

8. Proffit, William R, et al. Contemporary Orthodontics. 6th ed. Canada: Elsevier Ltd;
2019. 1-18.

9. Gupta A, Shrestha RM. A review of orthodontic indices. Orthodontic Journal of Nepal. 2015;
4(2): 44-50. doi: 10.3126/ojn.v 4i2.13898.p.44-50

10. Rampersadh Y. The perceived and normative orthodontic treatment need of a group of South
African Children. University of The Western Cape: Theses and Disertations; 2015.

11. Clijmans M, Medhat A, Geest A De, et al. Judging orthodontic treatment complexity.
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016; 21(1): 60-66. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.1.060-066.oar

12. Kapoor P, Singh H. Evaluation of esthetic component of the index of orthodontic treatment need: The orthodontists’ perspective. Indian J Dent. 2015; 6(4): 181-184. doi: 10.4103/0975-962X.170368

13. Marya C, Nagpal R, Obeori, et al. Perceived asthetic impact of malocclusion in 16-24 years
old adults in the rural area of India. Plast Aesthet Res. 2014; 1(2): 58-61.
doi: 10.4103/2347-9264.139701

14. Yoon Y, Kim YG, Lee SK, Lee JM. 3-dimensional analysis about the effects of aging and risk factors on changes in oral environment. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019; 11(2): 75-80. doi: 10.4047/jap.2019.11.2.75

15. Ningsih DS. Hubungan jenis kelamin terhadap kebersihan rongga mulut anak panti asuhan.
Odonto: Dental Journal. 2015; 2(1): 14-19. doi: 10.30659/odj.2.1.14-19

16. Jain S, Kaur H, Aggarwal R. Classification system of gingival recession: An Update.
Indian J Dent Sci. 2017; 9(1): 52. doi: 10.4103/0976-4003.201632

17. Tonetti MS, Greenwell H, Kornman KS. Staging and grading of periodontitis: Framework and
proposal of a new classification and case definition. J Periodontol. 2018; 89(1): 159-172. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0006

18. German DS, Chu SJ, Furlong ML, Patel A. Simplifying optimal tooth-size calculations and
communications between practitioners. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 150(6):
1051-1055. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.031

19. ElShehaby M, Mofti B, Montasser MA, Beam D. Powered vs manual tooth brushing in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020; 158(5): 639-649. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.04.018

20. Al-Jazeer RN. The effect of overbite and overjet on clinical parameters of periodontal
disease: a case control study. Saudi Dent J. 2021; 33(4): 201-206.
doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.02.002

21. Kaya Y, Alkan Ö, Keskin S. An Evaluation of the gingival biotype and the width of
keratinized gingiva in the mandibular anterior region of individuals with different dental
malocclusion groups and levels of crowding. Korean J Orthod. 2017; 47(3): 176-185.
doi: 10.4041/kjod.2017.47.3.176



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.92375

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1142 | views : 278

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2024 Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


 

 View My Stats


real
time web analytics