* Corresponding Author
Effect of Nanofilled Resin-Based Coating on the Compressive Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement – in vitro
https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.65512 Ardy Setiawan(1*), Juanita Amaludin Gunawan(2), Selviana Wulansari(3), Didi Nugroho(4)
(1) Department of Conservative Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta
(2) Department of Conservative Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta
(3) Department of Conservative Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta
(4) Department of Conservative Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Glass ionomer cement as one of the restoration materials requires high compressive strength so it can last during functional activity. The latest glass ionomer cement comes with glass hybrid technology and a nanofilled resin-based protective coating which is said to increase the compressive strength of glass ionomer cement. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of nanofilled resin-based coating and the types of glass ionomer cement materials on their compressive strength. Two types of commercial glass ionomer cement material were used; conventional (Fuji IX GP Extra), and hybrid (EQUIA Forte Fill) glass ionomer cement. Forty cylindrical (4 x 6 mm) samples were prepared in each group. The main group was divided into 4 subgroups (n=10) based on the protective coating used (EQUIA Forte Coat, Varnish, Control, Water + EQUIA Forte Coat). Eight subgroups were immersed in 37 °C distilled water for 7 days, then a compressive strength test was performed using a universal testing machine. The data analysis showed no significant difference in the compressive strength between the two types of glass ionomer cement materials (p>0.05). The use of a protective coating was associated with a significant decrease in the compressive strength (p<0.05). The use of glass ionomer cement without the application of a protective coating was considered to be quite good because the compressive strength value of the restoration still met the standards of the American Dental Association.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Malavasi C. Caries progression: How can we control this disease? J Interdiscipl Med Dent
Sci. 2018; 6(1): 1-4. doi: 10.4172/2376-032X.1000227
2. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Riset Kesehatan Dasar (Riskesdas) 2013.
3. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Riset Kesehatan Dasar (Riskesdas) 2018.
4. Ismail AI, Pitts NB, Tellez M. The international caries classification and management
system (ICCMS TM) an example of a caries management pathway. BMC Oral Health.
2015; 15(Suppl 1): S9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-15-S1-S9
5. Lerech SB, Tarón SF, Dunoyer AT, María J, Arrieta B, Caballero AD. Compressive strength
of glass ionomer and composite resin. In vitro study. Revista Odontológica Mexicana. 2017;
21(2): e107-111. doi: 10.1016/j.rodmex.2017.05.015
6. Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Cabello I, Toledano-Osorio M, Aguilera FS. In vitro mechanical stimulation facilitates stress dissipation and sealing ability at the conventional glass ionomer cement-dentin interface. J Dent. 2018; 73: 61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.006
7. Rahman IA, Ghazali NAM, Bakar WZW, Masudi SM. Modification of glass ionomer cement by incorporating nanozirconiahydroxyapatite-silica nano-powder composite by the one-pot technique for hardness and aesthetics improvement. Ceramics International. 2017; 43(16): 13247-13253. doi: 0.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.022
8. Bagheri R, Taha N, Azar M, Burrow M. Effect of G-coat plus on the mechanical properties
of glass-ionomer cements. Aust Dent J. 2013; 58(4): 448-453. doi: 10.1111/adj.12122
9. Alvanforoush N, Wong R, Burrow M, Palamara J. Fracture toughness of glass ionomers
measured with two different methods. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019; 90: 208-216.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.09.020
10. Zoergiebel J, Ilie N. Evaluation of a conventional glass ionomer cement with new
zinc formulation: Effect of coating, aging and storage agents. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17(2):
619-626. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0733-1
11. Brzović Rajić V, Miletić I, Gurgan S, Peroš K, Verzak Ž, Ivanišević Malčić A. Fluoride
release from glass ionomer with nano filled coat and varnish. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2018;
52(4): 307-313. doi: 10.15644/asc52/4/4
12. Anusavice KJ. Mechanical properties of dental materials. In: Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls
HR, eds. Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials. 12th ed. St.Louis: Elsevier; 2013. 48-68.
13. Baig MS, Dowling AH, Cao X, Fleming GJP. A discriminatory mechanical testing performance indicator protocol for hand-mixed glass-ionomer restoratives. Dental Materials.
2015; 31(3): 273-283. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.12.012
14. International organization for standardization (ISO). Standard for water-based dental
cements. In; 2007: 9917-1.
15. Mount GJ, Ngo HC. Glass-ionomer materials. In: Mount GJ, Hume WR, Ngo HC, Wolff MS,
eds. Preservation and Restoration of Tooth Structure. 3rd ed. Iowa: John Wiley & Sons;
2016. 139-168.
16. Primus C, Shen C. Dental cements. In: Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR, eds.
Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials. 12th ed. St.Louis: Elsevier; 2013. 307-339.
17. Almuhaiza M. Glass-ionomer cements in restorative dentistry: a critical appraisal. J
Contemp Dent Pract. 2016; 17(4): 331-336. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1850
18. Nicholson JW. Maturation processes in glassionomer dental cements. Acta Biomater
Odontol Scand. 2018; 4(1): 63-71. doi: 10.1080/23337931.2018.1497492
19. Mensudar R, Sukumaran VG. To evaluate the effect of surface coating on three different types glass ionomer restorations. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2015; 8: 445-449. doi: 10.13005/bpj/720
20. Ilie N. Maturation of restorative glass ionomers with simplified application procedure. J Dent.
2018; 79: 46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.09.008
21. Bohner LOL, Prates LHM. Compressive strength of a glass ionomer cement under
the influence of varnish protection and dietary fluids. Odovtos. 2018; 20(3): 61-69.
doi: 10.15517/ijds.v0i0.33607
22. Hamid DMA, Mahmoud GM, El-Sharkawy FM, Auf EAA. Effect of surface protection, staining beverages and aging on the color stability and hardness of recently introduced uncoated glass ionomer restorative material. Future Dental Journal. 2018; 4(2): 288-296.
doi: 10.1016/j.fdj.2018.05.004
23. Gorseta K, Glavina D, Skrinjaric T, Czarnecka B, Nicholson JW. The effect of petroleum jelly, light-cured varnish and different storage media on the flexural strength of glass ionomer dental cements. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2016; 2(1): 55-59. doi: 10.3109/23337931.2016.1160784
24. Pilo R, Ben-Amar A, Barnea A, Blasbalg Y, Levartovsky S. The effect of resin coating on
the shear punch strength of restorative glass ionomer cements. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;
21(4): 1079-1086. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1862-8
25. Hankins AD, Hatch RH, Benson JH, Blen BJ, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A. The effect of a nanofilled resin based coating on water absorption by teeth restored with glass
ionomer. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014; 145(4): 363-370. doi: 10.14219/jada.2043.3
26. Yip HK, To WM. An FTIR study of the effects of artificial saliva on the physical characteristics
of the glass ionomer cements used for art. Dent Mater. 2005; 21(8): 695-703.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.09.009
27. Mckenzie MA, Linden RWA, Nicholson JW. The physical properties of conventional and
resin-modified glass-ionomer dental cements stored in saliva, proprietary acidic beverages,
saline and water. Biomaterials. 2003; 24(22): 4063-4069.
doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00282-5
28. Shintome LK, Nagayassu MP, Nicoló R Di, Myaki SI. Microhardness of glass ionomer
cements indicated for the ART technique according to surface protection treatment and
storage time. Braz Oral Res. 2009; 23(4): 439-445.
doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242009000400014
29. Alzraikat H, Maghaireh GA, Zawaideh FI. Physico-mechanical properties of a nanofilled
glass ionomer cement. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2016; 4(3): 270-274.
30. Association AD. ANSI/ADA Specification No 96. Dental Water-based Cements. American
National Standard Institute. 2000.
31. Poggio C, Vialba L, Marchioni R, Colombo M, Pietrocola G. Esthetic restorative materials
and glass ionomer cements: Influence of acidic drink exposure on bacterial adhesion.
Eur J Dent. 2018; 12(2): 204-209. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_219_17
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.65512
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 1288
| 
views : 973
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.