* Corresponding Author
Effect of Bombyx mori silk-fiber volume on flexural strength of fiber-reinforced composite
https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.25186 Aria Fransiska(1*), Siti Sunarintyas(2), Rini Dharmastiti(3)
(1) Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, Universitas Andalas, Padang, West Sumatra
(2) Department of Dental Biomaterials, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(3) Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Dental glass fiber is one of dental synthetic fibers that are widely used in dentistry as a dental resin reinforcement, such as in dentin replacement material. The availability of glass fiber is limited in Indonesia because it must be imported and relatively expensive. Bombyx mori silk-fiber is one of the strongest natural fiber derived from silkworm cocoon processing. Silk-fiber is used in medical applications as a post-surgical sutures, scaffolds for tissue engineering and drug delivery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of Bombyx mori silk-fiber volume on the flexural strength of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC). We used Bombyx mori silk-fiber (Perhutani Pati, Central Java, Indonesia) and flowable composite (Charmfil flow, Denkist, Korea) in this study. The FRC samples were divided into 4 groups consisting of fiber volumes of 0%, 5%, 10% and 15% (n = 4). Tests of flexural strength were performed according to ISO 4049. The results were analyzed using one way ANOVA (p<0.05). The study showed that the means of the flexural strength (MPa) of Bombyx mori silk-fiber FRC for volume of 0%, 5%, 10% and 15% were 149.2 ± 5.5; 127.6 ± 3.8; 110.9 ± 3.5; 71.2 ± 4.2. One-way ANOVA test showed that the means of FRC flexural strength on the four groups’ silk-fiber Bombyx mori volumetric were significantly different (p<0.05). This study concluded that Bombyx mori silk-fiber volumetric influences the flexural strength of fiber- reinforced composite. An increase in Bombyx mori silk-fiber volume decreases the flexural strength of FRC because there is a small gap due to the weak interfacial bonds between dental flowable composite and Bombyx mori silk-silk-fiber.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Karaarslan ES, Bulbul M, Yildiz E, Secilmis A, Sari F, Usumez A. Effects of different polishing methods on color stability of resin composites after accelerated aging. Dent Mater J. 2013; 32(1): 58–67.
2. Moszner N, Salz U. New development of poly- meric dental composites. Prog Polym Sci. 2001; 26(4): 535–576.
3. Garoushi SK, Vallittu PK, Watts DC, Lassila LV. Polymerization shrinkage of experimental short glass fiber-reinforced composite with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix. Dental Materials. 2007; 24(2): 211–215.
4. Garoushi S, Hatem M, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. The effect of short fiber composite base on microleakage and load-bearing capacity of posterior restorations load-bearing capacity of posterior restorations. Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavia. 2015; 1(1): 5–12.
5. Butterworth C, Ellakwa AE, Shortall A. Fiber- reinforced composites in restorative dentistry. Dent Update. 2003; 30: 300–306.
6. Rijswijk VK, Brouwer WD, Beukers A. Appli- cation of natural fibre composites. Delft Aero- space: Stevinweg. 2001; 1–43.
7. Garoushi S, Vallittu PK dan Lassila LVJ. Direct restoration of severely damaged incisors using short fiber-reinforced composite resin. J Dent. 2007; 35(9): 731–736.
8. Garoushi S, Vallittu PK dan Lassila LVJ. Frac- ture Toughness, compressive strength and load-bearing capacity of short glass fibre- reinforced composite resin. Chin J Dent Res. 2011; 14(1): 15–19.
9. Garoushi S, Tanner J, Vallittu PK, Lassila L.Preliminary clinical evaluation of short fiber-reinforced composite resin in posterior teeth: 12-months report. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2012; 6: 41–45.
10. Borror DJ, Triplehorn CA, Johnson NF. Pengenalan pendidikan serangga. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press; 1992.
11. Nurjayanti ED. Budidaya ulat sutera dan produksi benang sutera melalui sistem kemitraan pada Pengusahaan Sutera Alam (PSA) Regaloh Kabupaten Pati. Mediagro. 2011; 7(2): 1–10.
12. Altman GH, Diaz F, Jakuba C, Calabro T, Horan R L, Chen J, Lu H, Richmond J, Kaplan DL. Silk-Based Biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2002; 24: 401–416.
13. Zafar MS, Al-samadani. Potential use of natural silk for bio-dental applications. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences. 2014; 9(3): 171–177.
14. Ude AU, Eshkoor RA, Zulkifili R, Ariffin AK, Dzuraidah AW, Azhari CH. Bombyx mori silk fibre and its composite: a review of contemporary developments. Materials and Design. 2014; 57: 298–305.
15. Hakimi O, Knight DP, Vollrath F, Vakguna P. Spider and mulberry silk worm silk as compatible biomaterials. Composite part B-Eng. 2007; 38: 324–337.
16. Omenetto FG, Kaplan DL. New opportunities for an ancient material. Science. 2010; 329: 528–531.
17. Hardy JG, Romer LM, Scheibel TR. Polymeric materials based on silk proteins. Polymer. 2008; 49: 4309–4327.
18. Zuo B, Dai L, Wu Z. Analysis of structure and properties of biodegradable regenerated silk fibroin fibers. J Mater Sci. 2006; 41: 3357–3361.
19. Gosline J, Guerette P, Ortlepp C, Savage K. The mechanical design of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanicalfunction. J Exp Biol. 1999; 202: 3295–3303.
20. Vallittu PK, Narva K. Impact strength of a modified continuous glass fiber polymethyl methacrylate. Int J Prosthodont. 1997; 10(2): 142–148.
21. Loncar A, Vojvodic D, Jerolimov V, Komar D, Zabarovic, D. Fiber reinforced polymers part II: effect on mechanical properties. Acta Sto- matologica Croatica. 2008; 42(1): 49–63.
22. Anusavice KJ. Phillip’s Science of Dental Material. 11thed. Missouri: Mosby Elsevier; 2003. 74–98, 722–747.
23. Jagger DC, Allen RG, Harrison SM. An inves- tigation into the transverse and impact strenght of high strenght denture base acrylic resins. in: gizbuz, unalan, dikbas. comparison of the transverse strenght of six acrylic denture resins. J Oral Rehabilitation. 2010; 9: 21–24.
24. Hasan RH. Comparison of some physical properties of acrylic denture base material cured by water bath and microwave technique. Al-Rafidain Dent J. 2003; 3: 143–147.
25. Garoushi SK, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. Short fiber reinforced composite: the effect of fiber length and volume fraction. The J Contemporary Dent. Pract. 2006; 7(5): 1–10.
26. Bogush VG, Sokolova OS, Davydova LI, Klinov DV, Sidoruk KV, Esipova NG, Neretina TV, Orchanskyi IA, Makeev VY, Tumanyan VG, Shaitan KV, Debabov VG, Kirpichnikov MP. A Novel model system for Design of Biomaterials Based on Recombinant Analogs of Spider Silk Proteins. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2009; 4(1): 17–27.
27. Abdulmajeed AA, Narhi TO, Vallitu PK, Lassila LV. The effect of high fiber fraction on some mechanical properties of unidirectional glass fiber-reinforced composite. Journal Dental Materials. 2011; 27: 313–321.
28. Ellakwa A, Shortall A, Marquis P. Influence of fibre position on the flexural properties and strain energi of a fibre-reinforced composite. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2003; 30: 679–682.
29. ISO 4049. Dentistry – polymer-based filling restorative and luting materials. Geneva: International Organization for Standarization; 2000. 1–25.
30. Dhakal HN, Zhang ZY, Richardson MOW. Effect of water absorption on the mechanical properties of hemp fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites. Composites Science and Technology. 2006; 67: 1674–1683.
31. Facca AG. Predicting the tensile strength of natural fibre reinforced thermoplastics. Com- pos Sci Technol. 2007; 67: 2454–2566.
32. Fu SY, Lauke B. Science and engineering of short fibre reinforced polymer composites. CRC Press LCC. 2009.
33. Long JJ, Wang HW, Lu TQ, Tang RC, Zhu YW. Application of low pressure plasma pretreatment in silk fabric degumming process. Plasma chemistry and plasma process. 2008; 28: 701–713.
34. Jiang P, Liu H, Wang C. Tensile behavior and morphology of differently degummed silkworm (Bombyx mori) cocoon silk fibres. Mater Lett. 2006; 60: 919–925.
35. Sah MK, Pramanik K. Regenerated silk fibroin from b. mori silk cocoon for tissue engineering application. Journal of Environmental Science and Development. 2010; 1(5): 404–408.
36. Nindhia TGT, Surata IW, Knejzlik Z, Ruml T, Nindhia TS. New route in degumming of bom- byx mory silkworm cocon for biomaterial. Jour- nal of Medical and Bioengineering. 2015; 4(4): 1–4.
37. Hardy JG, Scheibel TR. Silk-inspired polymer and proteins. Biochem Soc Trans. 2009; 37: 677–681.
38. Ho M, Lau K, Wang H, Bhattacharyya D. Characteristics of silk fibre reinforced biode-gradable plastic. Composites: Part B. 2011; 42: 117–122.
39. Ho M, Wang H, Lau K, Lee J, Hui D. Interfacial bonding and degumming effects on silk fibre/ polymer biocomposites. Composites: Part B. 2012; 43: 2801–2812.
40. Goracci C, Cadenaro M, Fontanive L, Giang- rosso G, Juloski J, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Poly- merization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites. Dental Materials. 2014; 30(6): 688–694.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.25186
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 3942
| 
views : 2784
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.