Pelaksanaan Opiumpacht: Monopoli Perdagangan Opium Melalui Perantara Bandar di Keresidenan Kediri, 1833-1900

https://doi.org/10.22146/lembaran-sejarah.59912

Ahmad Fathoni(1*), Sarkawi B. Husain(2)

(1) Departemen Ilmu Sejarah, Universitas Airlangga
(2) Departemen Ilmu Sejarah, Universitas Airlangga
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The opium trade in Kediri Residency was monopolized by Dutch East Indies government. The problem discussed in this study regarding opium trade monopoly at Kediri Residency through bookie intermediary (opiumpachter) in 1833-1900. The methods used in this research is historical methods which includes heuristics, criticism, interpretation and historiography. The result showed that the opium trade monopoly through bookie intermediary (opiumpachter) in Kediri Residency included auction and distribution processions also the sale of raw opium to opium dealers. Generally, the opium trade in Kediri Residency was controlled by Chinese. They become intermediary traders who sell government opium to people in Kediri Residency. The high tax offer at opium auction in Kediri Residency gave high profits to the country. On the contrary, that puts a great deal of pressure on the opium port. The crisis which occurred at the end of the 19th century, caused a setback in the opium trade monopoly through bookie intermediary (opiumpachter) in Kediri Residency.

Keywords


Kediri Residency; monopoly; opium trade; opiumpachter; Keresidenan Kediri; monopoli; perantara bandar; perdagangan opium

Full Text:

PDF


References

Sumber Primer

Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia. Consideratien en advies van den Directeur van Financien 18 Augustus 1897 no. 17502 (ANRI: Algemene Secretarie Grote Bundel M.G.S 1890-1942 no 3926).

Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia. Rapport van 10 November 1894 (ANRI: Algemene Secretary Serie Grote Bundel Missive Gouvernements Secretary 1890-1942, 1890 no. 3926).

Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia. Rapport van 11 November 1890 (ANRI: Algemene Secretary Serie Grote Bundel Missive Gouvernements Secretary 1890-1942, 1890 no. 3746).

Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia. Soerat Peratoeran dari Beja Apioen di tanah Djawa dan Madura (ANRI: Archieven Financien 1816-1930 no. 944: 5).

Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia. Verpachting van het regt tot den verkoop van opium in het klein (ANRI: Archieve van Financien 1816-1930 no. 944).

De Locomotief: Handels-en advertientie blad, 10 Agustus 1875.

Javasche Courant, 22 Oktober 1836.

Koloniaal Verslag tahun 1866.

Koloniaal Verslag tahun 1869.

Koloniaal Verslag tahun 1871-1901.

Soerabaiasch-Handelsblad, 1886.

Staatsblad van Nederlandsche-indie no. 256 tahun 1898.

Staatsblad van Nederlandsche-indie no. 65 tahun 1837.

Buku dan Sumber Cetakan

Ibrahim, Julianto. OPIUM DAN REVOLUSI Perdagangan dan Penggunaan Opium di Surakarta Masa revolusi (1945-1950). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2013.

Kuntowijoyo. Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana, 2013.

Nurdin, Adnil Edwin. Madat, Sejarah, Dampak Klinis dan Penanggulangannya. Semarang: Mutiara Wacana, 2007.

Rush, James R. Candu Tempo Doeloe Pemerintah, Pengedar dan Peopium 1860-1910. Jakarta: Komunitas Bambu, 2012.

Salmon, Claudine Lombard. “The Han Family of East Java. Entrepreneurship and Politics (18th-19th Centuries)”, dalam Jurnal Archipel, Volume 41, 1991: 77-79.

Sartono Kartodirdjo, Marwati Djoened Poesponegoro, dkk. Sejarah Nasional Indonesia IV. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1977.

Scheltema, J.F. “The Opium Trade in the Ducht East Indies.1,” American Journal of Sociology, vol 13, no.1, pp 79-112. The University of Chicago Press, 1907.

Van Ours, Eric W. van Luijk and Jan C. “The Effect of Government Policy on Drug Use: Java, 1832-1904”, Journal of Economic History, vol.61, No.1 pp, 1-18, (Cambridge University), 2001.

Vleming Jr., J.L. Kongsi & Spekulasi Jaringan Kerja Bisnis Cina. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Graffiti, 1989.

Baud and Hoffman, J.C. Proeve van Eene Geschiedenis van Handel en Het Verbruik van Opium in Nederlandsche Indie. Leiden: Brill, 1853.

Wahid, Abdul. From Revenue Farming to state Monopoly: The political Economy of Taxation in Colonial Indonesia, Java c. 1816-1942. Belanda: Utrecht University, 2013.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/lembaran-sejarah.59912

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 3614 | views : 4349

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Lembaran Sejarah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


ISSN 2620-5882(online) | © 2024 Lembaran Sejarah

View My Stats