SIPKADES (Sistem Informasi Potensi Kreatif Desa) Merintis Institusi Menjadi Mandiri : Belajar Mengelola Potensi Desa Bersama Teman Muda
Gregorius Ragil Wibawanto(1*)
(1) Youth Studies Centre (YouSure), FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada Studio Batu
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Artikel ini bermaksud untuk mengurai pengalaman semasa belajar mengelola potensi desa bersama dengan teman – teman muda Brosot. Metode yang dilakukan dalam kegiatan ini adalah participatory action research di mana peneliti berposisi sebagai partner dalam merefleksikan kondisi yang mengitari teman – teman muda di Brosot. Pendekatan teoretik dalam praktik tersebut berlandaskan perangkat pikir institutional entrepreneurship yang memandang aktivitas entrepreneurship memiliki relasi bolak – balik yang intens dengan kecenderungan institusional yang bersinggungan. Tujuan akhir dari keseluruhan kegiatan ini adalah sebuah karya bersama yang dapat meningkatkan partisipasi teman – teman muda dalam pengambilan keputusan di level desa sekaligus mempersiapkan alternatif-kreatif bagi masa depan mereka.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alvarez, C., Urbano, D., Corduras, A., & Navarro, J. (2011). Environmental conditions and entrepreneurial activity: A regional comparison in Spain. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18(1), 120–140.
Anderson, A. R., & Jack, S. L. (2002). The articulation of social capital in entrepreneurial networks: a glue or a lubricant?. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 14(3), 193–210.
Battilana, Julie, and Thomas D'Aunno. 2009. "Institutional Work and the Paradox of Embedded Agency." Pp. 29-58 in Institutional Work, edited by Thomas Lawrence, Roy Suddaby, and Bernard Leca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beckert, J. (1999). Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change: The role of strategic choice and institutionalized practices in organizations. Organization Studies, 20(5), 777–799.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
DiMaggio, P.J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L.G.
Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations (pp. 3–21). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Fligstein, N. 2001. Social skills and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2): 105-125.
Fukuyama, Y, 1995, Trush: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, London: Hamish Hamilton Affairs, 3, 187-203
Kennelly, Jacqueline. 2011. Citizen Youth : Culture, Activism, and Agency in A Neoliberal Era. New York : Palgrave Macmillan.
Krueger, N. (1993). Impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 18(1), 5–21.
Mannheim, Karl. 1952. Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Rou
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Palfrey, John and Urs Gasser. 2008. Born Digital : Understanding The First Generation of Digital Natives. New York : Basic Books.
Parker, Lyn and Nilan, Pam 2013. Adolescents in Contemporary Indonesia, London & New York: Routledge.
Suzanne Naafs & Ben White. 2012. “Intermediate Generations: Reflections on Indonesian Youth Studies.” The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology Vol. 13, No. 1, February
White, Ben. 2016a. Generation and Social Change: Indonesian Youth in Comparative Perspective in Kathryn Robinson (eds), Youth Identities and Social Transformations in Modern Indonesia. Leiden, Boston : Brill.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/studipemudaugm.36818
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 2695 | views : 2564Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Studi Pemuda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Studi Pemuda (Online ISSN 2527-3639; Print ISSN 2252-9020) is published by the Youth Studies Centre in collaboration with Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada. |